• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Real Dinosaurs caught on Videotape!

Kilgore Trout

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
lewisnotmiller said:
Clearly fake.
Sorry, my friend, nice try. But I am a CGI expert. Your fancy pants animations might fool the run-of-the-mill imbecile, but it took me no more than 8-10 hours of forensic investigation to conclude that the human in this video was generated by a computer.
Click to expand...

I don't think so. I've seen like every CGI movie ever made and am an expert at determining CGI from real life. I've studies this film for months, and it sure seems to be the genuine article to me.
 
Sunstone

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
lewisnotmiller said:
Clearly fake.
Sorry, my friend, nice try. But I am a CGI expert. Your fancy pants animations might fool the run-of-the-mill imbecile, but it took me no more than 8-10 hours of forensic investigation to conclude that the human in this video was generated by a computer.
Click to expand...

Kilgore Trout said:
I don't think so. I've seen like every CGI movie ever made and am an expert at determining CGI from real life. I've studies this film for months, and it sure seems to be the genuine article to me.
Click to expand...

I'm still wondering how anyone can possibly imagine it possible to catch an adult dinosaur with videotape. I mean, maybe with rope. Especially strong rope. But videotape? That's ridiculous! I am a bondage expert and it took me no more than two weeks of intense study to conclude that videotape is simply not strong enough to restrain an adult tyrannosaurus preparatory to mating.
 
lewisnotmiller

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Sculelos said:
I'd say Dinosaur really is too broad of a classification to know if they were warm or cold blooded for sure.

Birds are typically warm blooded but most Reptiles are cold blooded including Alligators, Crocodiles and Lizards.

However I don't like the word Dinosaur because it is by definite not definitive. I'd probably more likely just call them Dragons like the ancients did.

Allosaurus/Carcharodontosaurus/Tyrannosaurus : Water type, egg laying, cold blooded, Omnivore, scaled.

Ankylosaurus: Swamp type, egg laying, cold blooded, herbivore, thick scales.

Apatosaurus/Brachiosaurus/Diplodocus: Swamp type, egg laying, cold blooded, herbivore, scaled

Brachylophosaurus: Water type, omnivore, scaled, cold blooded.

Deinonychus/Dromaeosaur/Velociraptor mongoliensis: Air type, feathered, egg laying, warm blooded, omnivore

Iguanodon/maiasaura: Swamp type, Scaled, egg laying, cold blooded

Mosasaur: Sea type, scaled, egg laying, cold blooded.

Oviraptor philoceratops/troodon formosus: Air type, feathered, egg laying, warm blooded.

Protoceratops/Triceratops : Swamp type, scaled, egg laying, cold blooded.

Spinosaurus: Water type, scaled, egg laying, cold blooded.

Stegosaurus: Swamp type, scaled, egg laying, cold blooded.
Click to expand...

Birds are typically warm-blooded? I would have thought they are invariably warm-blooded, but I'm no expert.

As for the rest...:shrug:
I have you pegged as a Poe by this point. I apologize if your ramblings are honest, but I don't see how you can intellectually justify them.

Dinosaurs were warm-blooded, new paper reports - SFGate
 
Sculelos

Sculelos

Active Member
lewisnotmiller said:
:eek:

You realise I'm an Aussie, right? Of course you do. :clap
Bravo sir. Well played. Would you be offended if I gave you a spot in my sigline?
Click to expand...

I won't be offended.

But seriously the closest well known thing we have to the ancient Dinosaurs seems to me to be the Platypus since it really looks like a hybrid between a lizard and a mammal but it really can't be classified as either.
 
Valjean

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
The frilled shark was, well, a frilled shark. Apparently a rare but known species. A shark, not a dinosaur, and all sharks are "prehistoric."

Congo and S. African creatures: fakes, IMHO.
 
tumbleweed41

tumbleweed41

Resident Liberal Hippie
Sculelos said:
I won't be offended.

But seriously the closest well known thing we have to the ancient Dinosaurs seems to me to be the Platypus since it really looks like a hybrid between a lizard and a mammal but it really can't be classified as either.
Click to expand...
It is a mammal. As is the other modern monotreme, the echidna.

You are embarrassing yourself.
 
Kilgore Trout

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
Found some more shocking footage of modern-day dinosaurs. The evidence is becoming overwhelming, and impossible to ignore:

[youtube]HMUIJ_Foqrc[/youtube]
 
F

FranklinMichaelV.3

Well-Known Member
Kilgore Trout said:
Found some more shocking footage of modern-day dinosaurs. The evidence is becoming overwhelming, and impossible to ignore:

[youtube]HMUIJ_Foqrc[/youtube]
Click to expand...

They've grown smarter...singing songs of love to lower our guard so they can feast on our children...it's revenge...we killed them all those years ago when humans and dinosaurs loved together.
 
Sculelos

Sculelos

Active Member
tumbleweed41 said:
It is a mammal. As is the other modern monotreme, the echidna.

You are embarrassing yourself.
Click to expand...

Classifications are a human design. I believe if we seen what we call 'Dinosaurs' we would most likely change our classifications and our opinions of them would no doubtably change as well.

I'm sure we only know a small fraction of species of creatures that live in the ocean.
 
F

FranklinMichaelV.3

Well-Known Member
Sculelos said:
Classifications are a human design. I believe if we seen what we call 'Dinosaurs' we would most likely change our classifications and our opinions of them would no doubtably change as well.

I'm sure we only know a small fraction of species of creatures that live in the ocean.
Click to expand...

...don't we have dinosaur bones....
 
fantome profane

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
lewisnotmiller said:
Clearly fake.
Sorry, my friend, nice try. But I am a CGI expert. Your fancy pants animations might fool the run-of-the-mill imbecile, but it took me no more than 8-10 hours of forensic investigation to conclude that the human in this video was generated by a computer.
Click to expand...

That is really amazing. So what you are saying is that the human was digitally added to a preexisting video made by the dinosaurs 95 million years ago. Incredible!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top