• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Reasons For or Against Kavanaugh's Confirmation

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
It's a crap shoot.
The next pick could be better.....or even worse.
Whatever will happen will do so independently of whatever you & I want.
This is true. Let me ask you a question that I just thought of, regarding this. Would SCOTUS judges be something you would trust the population with? That is, public election? I will let you answer first, then I will force my views down your throat give you my opinion.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
This is true. Let me ask you a question that I just thought of, regarding this. Would SCOTUS judges be something you would trust the population with? That is, public election? I will let you answer first, then I will force my views down your throat give you my opinion.
I wouldn't trust this judgement to a general election.
The current process, shortcomings & all, looks better to me.

If left up to the people, you'd see news like....
"Chief Justice Kardashian Institutes Nude Fridays For SCOTUS"
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
But, are any of these 'lies' important? :D.

Doesn't matter. If a lie about a PERSONAL action-- that was not illegal-- is grounds to be REMOVED FROM THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT?

ANY lie that is under oath is grounds to NOT GET INTO PUBLIC OFFICE.

Not only should he be NOT allowed in the Supreme Court? He should never be allowed in ANY court as a judge, EVER again.
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
It would take like some _actual_ evidence for me to be convinced. Her testimony has more holes than a wheel of swiss cheese.

We have multiple instances where he LIED -- about serious issues, including his legal standing as a Judge. All on tape. All fact-checkable-- all LIES.

But don't let his absolute DISHONESTY affect your "decision". So long as he's a True GOP Goon?

It's all good, right?
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
I'm in favor of Kavanaugh getting voted through because it seems there are only minor questions about his application of Constitutional principles to his court cases and no terrible opinions or methodological considerations to how he reaches his opinions.

The accusations are so far meaningless. There is not a bit of corroborating evidence for any of the ever increasingly outrageous attacks against Kavanaugh. Ford's, the least outright offensive of those, is entirely lacking credibility, no when, no where, no details of any sort surrounding the supposed attack, and the only thing she is sure of, and she is 100% sure of that, is that Kavanaugh and Judge attacked her. No one, including her friends, that she claims were at this event will support her even in that a party where both her and Kavanaugh were present ever happened and have testified to that under threat of felony perjury.

I "liked" Kavanaugh's testimony, he both conveyed the righteous indignation of the wrongfully accused, especially of heinous crimes against humanity, and was more even tempered and controlled than I would have been in the face of such an assault fueled nearly entirely by partisan ****ery.


No one should have to subject themselves to what happened to Kavanaugh last Thursday. We should have brought in an admitted addict to tear apart his life, ask him how much he drank in high school, if Kavanaugh ever "ralphed" in his car, what "boofing" is, and if Kavanaugh rode the town bike? Come on.

That was an embarrassment. The only reason anyone wanted to bring him in is to get a T.V. recorded statement of him saying he drank so much and there are nights that he can't remember, in order to impugn by association Kavanaugh.

So you're not bothered he LIED UNDER OATH?

Okaaaay.....
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
Why not link them to support your claims?

Why bother? I'm automatically disqualified as credible, because I'm a liberal. So anything I post is also automatically ignored....

Much better if you find your own-- but you won't-- because, well, why should you bother?

K is a GOP Approved, Dyed-in-the-wool CONservitive, so he could literally pull a Donald tЯump, and attack women in public, and it would not matter.

.... wait....

.... he already did that, didn't he? And you don't care.
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
In other words, you make a claim, & if we do the research for you, then you'll be vindicated?

It is evidently clear, that K is a serial rapist/abuser of women.

There is plenty of evidence out there on Al Gore's Intertubes already.

But you don't care, because K is a GOP Goon.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Why bother? I'm automatically disqualified as credible, because I'm a liberal. So anything I post is also automatically ignored....

Much better if you find your own-- but you won't-- because, well, why should you bother?

K is a GOP Approved, Dyed-in-the-wool CONservitive, so he could literally pull a Donald tЯump, and attack women in public, and it would not matter.

.... wait....

.... he already did that, didn't he? And you don't care.
Don't sulk.
Just support your claim.
You say he lied & that there's proof on the internet.
You know what you're looking for.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It is evidently clear, that K is a serial rapist/abuser of women.
There is plenty of evidence out there on Al Gore's Intertubes already.
But you don't care, because K is a GOP Goon.
I don't care about unsupported claims, that much is true.
If you could support them, I'm sure you would.
I suspect that you made a rash claim, & cannot back down.
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
I wouldn't trust this judgement to a general election.
The current process, shortcomings & all, looks better to me.

If left up to the people, you'd see news like....
"Chief Justice Kardashian Institutes Nude Fridays For SCOTUS"
Almost as silly as a reality TV show host as president, eh? :D
 

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
We have multiple instances where he LIED -- about serious issues, including his legal standing as a Judge. All on tape. All fact-checkable-- all LIES.

But don't let his absolute DISHONESTY affect your "decision". So long as he's a True GOP Goon?

It's all good, right?

Haha!

I'm not anyone's pet. I just have consistency... Evidence or GTFO.

Dishonesty is just a distraction, if there were evidence it would be irrelevant as to what he has stated. So, what evidence are there that any true claims other than the ramblings on the level of conspiracy theories by the liberal goon squad? Yep, nothing.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
That's a pretty tough standard.
On what did Kavanaugh lie under oath....something objectively verifiable?
I believe he lied about knowingly accepting documents stolen from Democratic Senators.

I will google that and give sources if you want, but it will have to be later.
 
Top