• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Recent surge of claims about the infallibility of the Qur'an

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
Every now and again the forum experiences it.
Now there is a recent surge of threads about the so called scientific proofs of the Qur'an, or the claims of the book's infallibility.
Proeslytization, circular reasoning, the usual.

I'm wondering at what point have so many Muslims became so weak in their faith, that they have sunk to this theological bankruptcy and undying fountain of superstitions?
I was always interested in Islam, of course not in the way of believing in its revelations, but as a vast religious phenomena, centered in a fascinating geopolitical reality. I looked into Islamic explorers of the middle ages, the poets, the architectural and engineering feats that took place in the Islamic world.
yet there seems to be a mysterious gap, between these sophisticated individuals who have changed the world over, and people who take this legacy and present Islam as a redundant faith, where people obsessively proselytize, make the most mind numbing claims about their sacred text, and just present themselves as people who dropped out of school at the age of 13 in order to work on a farm.
All those shallow claims about scientific proofs in the Qur'an, about lofty truths of the book, about Islam being the religion that humanity should follow makes Islam look like a terrifying phenomena of ignorance and superstition.
for how long are we going to have to scroll through threads about the absolute truths of Islam, about anachronistic religious morals that most of us are shocked people hold in this age.
Many Muslims tell us, READ THE QUR'AN. well I have read the Qur'an, I have read it in two languages, and yet I don't believe that Muhammad flew on a winged steed from Mecca to Jerusalem, it did not make me want to convert into Islam. I have read it because I think its impossible for people not to read the texts of the major religions. I didn't find any scientific miracles in the Qur'an, I didn't find any absolute truths.
There are many people who are willing to go to great lengths in exploring other cultures and faiths, Islam included, and also to interact with the other people, however it is impossible to relate to these people when they are not willing to dialogue, and only preach how glorious their Deen is, how moral it is, how perfect it is for everyone.
It is not. many of us have rejected the religions of our own societies, not because we are looking for a new religion, but because we are disillusioned by religion in general.
however it is still possible for us to appreciate and study religions, just without the need to worship any deity or to participate in ritualistic routine in our lives.
Now I know, there are Muslim members here who are willing to go to great lengths in order to enhance our own interest in Islam, why not just give them a break, why not stop with the circular reasoning, Im sure that by now you realize that the non Muslim members simply do not see Islamic revelations as something to believe in, why not tone down with the proselytization and instead turn to informing, why not tone down the dichotomy between a perfect moral Islam, and a decadent secular west.
maybe we are not interested in converting to Islam, but we are willing to study about it. isn't that good enough?
my main point is that many members are willing to explore Islam (and yes it does include criticism), but all the self righteous, anti scientific, absolutist threads are like a bucket of cold water.
 

Sahar

Well-Known Member
Good post but that doesn't mean I (completely) agree. I am interested to know what kind of topics regarding Islam you think Muslim members should focus on?
 
  • Like
Reactions: kai

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
The most devout and dogmatic believers in all religions are those that are ill educated , poor, and easily led.
Islam is not a religion that takes easily to liberal, political or scientific change, or logical reinterpretation.

It seems to take a very long time for new Ideas to be recognised by new interpretations of the Koran.

This is understandable....as we have moved further and further from the early medieval world in which Islam flourished, so we have moved further away from those early and primitive religious and social concepts that are characterised by those found in the Koran.

Most Christians have come to accept that the Bible is not the literal word of God, But that it contains words and Ideas that always need reinterpreting to meet new modern situations.

Islam, by and large, has not reached this phase, partly because it is believed to be the actual and unchangeable word of God.
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
Its so predictable how such threads will end up,we have witnessed many such threads where goalposts will be moved and of course the circular reasoning you mention which can be annoying and tiresome.

Although i am not religious myself i think its important to learn about something before commenting on it and i just think these people should do the same when presenting something as a scientific fact that obviously isn't,i have yet to find a scientific miracle in any religious text.

The Qur'an is a book of faith not facts and to present it as otherwise is dishonest IMO,if your faith is a strong surely there is no reason to present it as a fact.
 

McBell

Unbound
Good post but that doesn't mean I (completely) agree. I am interested to know what kind of topics regarding Islam you think Muslim members should focus on?
How about topics that are not so easily refuted and shown to be absolute bull ****?

The only thing these "science in the Koran" threads have done is shown that there are Muslims who are willing to turn a blind eye to truth and facts.

For me and mine it isn't a really big deal, but for people who do not know much about Islam, these demonstrations of the Forer Effect merely add fuel to the stereotype that the media is trying so hard to present is the norm for Muslims.
 

beenie

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Good post but that doesn't mean I (completely) agree. I am interested to know what kind of topics regarding Islam you think Muslim members should focus on?

I agree with this and am curious too.

you know from my replies to those threads how I feel, but I have noticed that most topics brought up by Muslims are quickly attacked...I suppose they'd be supported if we started threads bashing Islam, yes?

every religion has its uneducated portion of the population, and yes, pointing out the miracles in the Qur'an is futile foe those who don't believe in the Qur'an.

what I'm saying is...if a Muslim poster starts a thread about women's rights as commanded in the Qur'an, it's quickly distracted to "what about..." and the same infamous verses are quoted.

it's difficult to carry on dialogue when constantly put on the defensive.

just an observation. I do agree that the threads about the Qur'an and scientific. miracles are a waste of bandwidth though. the Qur'an is our holy book with a few biological/scientific references, not a science book. :)
 

sandandfoam

Veteran Member
Islam is not a religion that takes easily to liberal, political or scientific change, or logical reinterpretation.


I disagree Terry. Islam is a universal religion that evolves in different cultural contexts while retaining it's core. A distinctly 'Western Islam' is in the process of emerging at the moment. I cite the writing of Tariq Ramadan as evidence of this. I also cite the many many Muslim people in the UK who remain Muslim and are also clearly British in their thoughts re liberalism, political and scientific change.

What constitutes 'logical reinterpretation' of the Koran is a tough one - but one need only look around here to see the variety of interpretations currently evidenced by various Muslims.
 

jonman122

Active Member
what I'm saying is...if a Muslim poster starts a thread about women's rights as commanded in the Qur'an, it's quickly distracted to "what about..." and the same infamous verses are quoted.

it's difficult to carry on dialogue when constantly put on the defensive.

just an observation. I do agree that the threads about the Qur'an and scientific. miracles are a waste of bandwidth though. the Qur'an is our holy book with a few biological/scientific references, not a science book.
If you can't use logic to properly defend your statements, then why make them? why put yourself in a position where you are forced to be on the defensive? Why say something so ludicrous that people feel the need to disprove what you're saying on the spot?

and my first refutation of your statement right there, that you just made, is that modern science didnt exist until 400 years ago, it does not exist at all the the qu'ran and there are no references to it in any way whatsoever. It has no science in any conceivable way, let alone references. It's like a poorly written fiction novel, easily refuted and disproved around every corner but are fiction novels read because they're true? it's once you start claiming that it's the absolute truth then it has to be disproved... for your own sake.
 

kai

ragamuffin
Good post but that doesn't mean I (completely) agree. I am interested to know what kind of topics regarding Islam you think Muslim members should focus on?

Politics:D seriously i am interested in Islamic views on just about everything , law and order,education,health care ,social services, foreign relations,Taxes, Etc etc , with regards the OP once you start saying something is infallible though someone is going to ask you to prove it
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
To be fair to my fundie friends, maybe it's an excess of zeal for some.
Weakness of faith is a good explanation too.
I guess I shouldn't rule out insanity either.
 

beenie

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
If you can't use logic to properly defend your statements, then why make them? why put yourself in a position where you are forced to be on the defensive? Why say something so ludicrous that people feel the need to disprove what you're saying on the spot?

because religious belief is not always based on LOGIC. there is the pesky "blind faith" aspect to it as well.

and my first refutation of your statement right there, that you just made, is that modern science didnt exist until 400 years ago, it does not exist at all the the qu'ran and there are no references to it in any way whatsoever. It has no science in any conceivable way, let alone references. It's like a poorly written fiction novel, easily refuted and disproved around every corner but are fiction novels read because they're true? it's once you start claiming that it's the absolute truth then it has to be disproved... for your own sake.

what are you babbling about?

i never said the Qur'an was a science book. i said there are references. you cannot deny what is written in there. the Qur'an DOES discuss embryonic development. whether it is ACCURATE is up for debate, and i clearly stated that in my post.

moving on... :rolleyes:
 

Venatoris

Active Member
I agree with this and am curious too.

you know from my replies to those threads how I feel, but I have noticed that most topics brought up by Muslims are quickly attacked...I suppose they'd be supported if we started threads bashing Islam, yes?

every religion has its uneducated portion of the population, and yes, pointing out the miracles in the Qur'an is futile foe those who don't believe in the Qur'an.

what I'm saying is...if a Muslim poster starts a thread about women's rights as commanded in the Qur'an, it's quickly distracted to "what about..." and the same infamous verses are quoted.

it's difficult to carry on dialogue when constantly put on the defensive.

I don't think it has anything to do with the beliefs that are presented but the way in which they are presented. From what I've seen recently, a large number of threads start with an "I am right and this proves it" mentality. If you go into a discussion with this mentality and someone voices an opposing view, of course you must default to a defensive position. If these threads started with a "this is what I believe, what do you think?" mentality, the defensive stance would be completely unnecessary. You need not defend your beliefs unless you are trying to prove that your beliefs are somehow better than others. Starting any debate with the notion that your viewpoint is infallible will always lead to an argument. You don't need to trash your own beliefs to find supporters on this forum, just be respectful and humble when stating your views. It would be ridiculous to expect others to respect your views when you don't respect theirs. I'm not talking about anyone of any faith in particular but everyone on the forum in general.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I imagine that for an atheist the probability of encountering a sane person is similar to the chances of having tea with god.

One never knows what insanity lurks in the hearts of men. I associate with atheists, deists, Baptists, Catholics,
agnostics & all other sorts. The odds are that some of'm must be sane. I wonder how to discern which is?
 
Last edited:

beenie

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I don't think it has anything to do with the beliefs that are presented but the way in which they are presented. From what I've seen recently, a large number of threads start with an "I am right and this proves it" mentality. If you go into a discussion with this mentality and someone voices an opposing view, of course you must default to a defensive position. If these threads started with a "this is what I believe, what do you think?" mentality, the defensive stance would be completely unnecessary. You need not defend your beliefs unless you are trying to prove that your beliefs are somehow better than others. Starting any debate with the notion that your viewpoint is infallible will always lead to an argument. You don't need to trash your own beliefs to find supporters on this forum, just be respectful and humble when stating your views. It would be ridiculous to expect others to respect your views when you don't respect theirs. I'm not talking about anyone of any faith in particular but everyone on the forum in general.

that makes sense. :)
 

sandandfoam

Veteran Member
One never knows what insanity lurks in the hearts of men. I associate with atheists, deists, Baptists, Catholics,
agnostics & all other sorts. The odds are that some of'm must be sane. I wonder how to discern which is?

An atheist who believes in sanity and a Christian who doesn't. If only I was still drinking - that sounds like the bar stool conversation from heaven.
 

Justin Thyme

Child of God
Good post but that doesn't mean I (completely) agree. I am interested to know what kind of topics regarding Islam you think Muslim members should focus on?

Personally, I'd like to see more posts putting the Koran in context. I'll easily accept your belief that the scriptures were dictated to the Prophet Muhammad (appropriate honorifics to show genuine respect) word for word but as in my Bible at least a portion of those scriptures address a specific problem or event current to the time and place when God gave those words. What was that context? There is too much reading for me to keep up with all the religions that interest me and still study my own so I depend on the followers of other religions to help me understand the subtleties of their religion. This is the way I find common ground.
 

Demonic Kitten

Active Member
Caladan: Good Post. I have to agree with you. I'm one of the ones who want to study Islam because religion as a whole fascinates me. I am usually stopped by the post you mentioned...it makes me wonder if I will actually learn anything or would I be expected to blindly believe. (What I just said probably makes no sense)


I had more that I wanted to say, but Venatoris beat me too it.
 
Top