• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Religion and delusion determine fake news belief

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
From: https://cosmosmagazine.com/society/religion-and-delusion-determine-fake-news-belief

"One of the more mystifying aspects of Donald Trump’s presidency may have been explained, by a team of economists and psychologists from Yale University in the US.

Throughout the latter period of his election campaign and during his incumbency, Mr Trump has enjoyed consistent support from the US evangelical community – a religious and socially conservative group who should, on the face of it, be repulsed by the president’s admissions of extra-marital affairs and lewd conduct.

In a paper posted on the university’s Social Science Research Network (SSRN), and still awaiting peer-review, researchers led Michael Bronstein from Yale’s Department of Psychology present evidence to suggest that people prone to delusion, dogmatists and religious fundamentalists all share a propensity to believe fake news.

The three, sometimes overlapping, communities are also more willing than the general public to accept absurd explanations for events, to entertain conspiracy theories, and to believe in paranormal phenomena.

The researchers suggest that “individuals who endorse delusion-like ideas … as well as dogmatic individuals and religious fundamentalists” believe untrue things because they exhibit “reduced engagement” with two methods of thinking.

Bronstein and colleagues define the first of these as “active open-minded thinking”, which involves the search for alternative explanations to explain phenomena and the use of evidence to revise conclusions. The second is “analytic thinking”, which, they write, “involves deliberate thought processes that consume memory resources”.

“Reduced engagement in these forms of thinking … fully explained increased belief in fake news among dogmatic individuals and religious fundamentalists,” the researchers conclude.

Study finds conservatives can change their minds
SOCIAL SCIENCES

To make the findings, Bronstein’s team used Amazon’s Mechanical Turk system to recruit two cohorts, each containing 500 volunteers.

Each volunteer was first shown 12 fake news stories, constructed to look like social media posts, and asked to assess whether they were accurate, dodgy, or a load of bull-pucky.

After that, the participants undertook a battery of psychological questionnaires, designed to measure dogmatism, depth of religious belief, and delusion. In the last category, they were asked also whether any delusion they experienced was regarded as convincing, and whether it caused distress.

In two final tests, volunteers undertook a range of “cognitive reflection” tasks (in which intuitively obvious possible answers to questions needed to be set aside in favour of reason-derived alternatives) and were assessed for “postdiction” habits – the tendency to revise a prediction once the evidence is in, without acknowledging the fact.

After analysis, the researchers found that people who whose worldview involves delusions were more likely than average to believe fake news. The same conclusion was reached regarding “dogmatic individuals and religious fundamentalists”.

“The vulnerability of these individuals to belief in fake news was fully explained by their tendency to engage in less analytic and actively open-minded thinking,” Bronstein and colleagues concluded.

The team strongly recommended further investigations into “potential interventions” to encourage analytic and active thinking, thereby reducing the likelihood of susceptible individuals falling for fake news. Such an approach may bring important social benefits, the researchers noted, among them the reduced likelihood of false information inciting violence (or, perhaps, emboldening presidents)."
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Throughout the latter period of his election campaign and during his incumbency, Mr Trump has enjoyed consistent support from the US evangelical community – a religious and socially conservative group who should, on the face of it, be repulsed by the president’s admissions of extra-marital affairs and lewd conduct.
Yep.
 

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I think many voted for him even though they were repulsed by him because he was perceived to be the lessor of the two evils.
 

joe1776

Well-Known Member
Maybe I missed something. It sounds to me like the study proves that naive people are more likely to believe things without sufficient evidence.

Nah, I must have missed something.:confused:
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
I have to conclude that his base is motivated not by trust, but by mistrust.
But I also think that much of those who voted for him did so because of having frustration, much of it deserved, with both parties here. So, I can cut them some slack on that but I cannot cut any slack for those who continue to support and defend Trump with all that he's said and done. As Gandhi said, "To cooperate with evil is evil", and so many things that he has said and done well fit into that category.

Also, imo, we have a large minority in this country that seemingly has no empathy for others. If Trump had groped them, made fun of them, refused to pay them for services rendered, cheated on them sexually, etc., would they still support him? So many seemingly have the attitude that as long as it's only happening to others, why care? But then it begs the question how can they reconcile it with their religion as most religions teach about the necessity of having empathy for others and acting out of compassion and fairness towards all? What are they going to services for if they have no intention of following even the most basic teachings?
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
I think that fits both sides. Mistrust of the other side is the driving force of American politics.
Considering the behavior of the GOP since at least the 1980s, I think that is far less clear a fit for Democrats. Or for non-Republicans in general, come to think of it.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
S
From: https://cosmosmagazine.com/society/religion-and-delusion-determine-fake-news-belief

"One of the more mystifying aspects of Donald Trump’s presidency may have been explained, by a team of economists and psychologists from Yale University in the US.

Throughout the latter period of his election campaign and during his incumbency, Mr Trump has enjoyed consistent support from the US evangelical community – a religious and socially conservative group who should, on the face of it, be repulsed by the president’s admissions of extra-marital affairs and lewd conduct.

In a paper posted on the university’s Social Science Research Network (SSRN), and still awaiting peer-review, researchers led Michael Bronstein from Yale’s Department of Psychology present evidence to suggest that people prone to delusion, dogmatists and religious fundamentalists all share a propensity to believe fake news.

The three, sometimes overlapping, communities are also more willing than the general public to accept absurd explanations for events, to entertain conspiracy theories, and to believe in paranormal phenomena.

The researchers suggest that “individuals who endorse delusion-like ideas … as well as dogmatic individuals and religious fundamentalists” believe untrue things because they exhibit “reduced engagement” with two methods of thinking.

Bronstein and colleagues define the first of these as “active open-minded thinking”, which involves the search for alternative explanations to explain phenomena and the use of evidence to revise conclusions. The second is “analytic thinking”, which, they write, “involves deliberate thought processes that consume memory resources”.

“Reduced engagement in these forms of thinking … fully explained increased belief in fake news among dogmatic individuals and religious fundamentalists,” the researchers conclude.

Study finds conservatives can change their minds
SOCIAL SCIENCES

To make the findings, Bronstein’s team used Amazon’s Mechanical Turk system to recruit two cohorts, each containing 500 volunteers.

Each volunteer was first shown 12 fake news stories, constructed to look like social media posts, and asked to assess whether they were accurate, dodgy, or a load of bull-pucky.

After that, the participants undertook a battery of psychological questionnaires, designed to measure dogmatism, depth of religious belief, and delusion. In the last category, they were asked also whether any delusion they experienced was regarded as convincing, and whether it caused distress.

In two final tests, volunteers undertook a range of “cognitive reflection” tasks (in which intuitively obvious possible answers to questions needed to be set aside in favour of reason-derived alternatives) and were assessed for “postdiction” habits – the tendency to revise a prediction once the evidence is in, without acknowledging the fact.

After analysis, the researchers found that people who whose worldview involves delusions were more likely than average to believe fake news. The same conclusion was reached regarding “dogmatic individuals and religious fundamentalists”.

“The vulnerability of these individuals to belief in fake news was fully explained by their tendency to engage in less analytic and actively open-minded thinking,” Bronstein and colleagues concluded.

The team strongly recommended further investigations into “potential interventions” to encourage analytic and active thinking, thereby reducing the likelihood of susceptible individuals falling for fake news. Such an approach may bring important social benefits, the researchers noted, among them the reduced likelihood of false information inciting violence (or, perhaps, emboldening presidents)."
So "bull pucky" is the scientific term?
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
I think that fits both sides. Mistrust of the other side is the driving force of American politics.

I see it mistrust of government vs mistrust of the wealthy.

Not much reason to trust either IMO. I suspect Trump rode in on a lot of distrust of government and he continues to rely on the distrust of government for support.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
I think many voted for him even though they were repulsed by him because he was perceived to be the lessor of the two evils.
Arguably.

But here we are discussing the type of people who sincerely believe Trump’s claims and defend him from all criticism, no matter how legitimate.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
Maybe I missed something. It sounds to me like the study proves that naive people are more likely to believe things without sufficient evidence.

Nah, I must have missed something.:confused:

Careful this study and others along this theme and discipline do not prove anything. Naive is interesting, but I think it really does not fit this case.

It is likely the strong overwhelming emotional commitment to extreme religious beliefs that tend to lead people not to develop 'critical thinking skills' to understand rational and logical alternatives to their own beliefs. 'Fake news' and by the way 'fake science' that reinforces their own beliefs is endorsed without question.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
I see it mistrust of government vs mistrust of the wealthy.

Not much reason to trust either IMO. I suspect Trump rode in on a lot of distrust of government and he continues to rely on the distrust of government for support.

There is also the specific evangelical and right wing agenda. For example; The desire for a religious conservative Supreme Court nomination would justify anyone for President including the Devil himself, which they may have got in spades.
 
Last edited:

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Considering the behavior of the GOP since at least the 1980s, I think that is far less clear a fit for Democrats. Or for non-Republicans in general, come to think of it.

Depends on your political perspective. Nothing more.
 

joe1776

Well-Known Member
It is likely the strong overwhelming emotional commitment to extreme religious beliefs that tend to lead people not to develop 'critical thinking skills' to understand rational and logical alternatives to their own beliefs. 'Fake news' and by the way 'fake science' that reinforces their own beliefs is endorsed without question.
I doubt that extreme religious beliefs, accepted naively, restricted anything. It seems me almost obvious that the people who accepted those beliefs would likely accept other baloney as well.

As for belief in the paranormal, that's probably an area that these scientists should have avoided in their study because the scientists who have not had a paranormal experience are likely to hold a bias against it. (If it hasn't happened to wonderful me, it's not possible)

Not long ago, more than 100 scientists signed a petition to end the prejudice against the study of precognition and telepathy in science.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
There is also the specific evangelical and right wing agenda. For example; The desire for a religious conservative Supreme Court nomination would justify anyone for President including the Devil himself, which they may have got in spades.
And if it were not for the utter catastrophic failure of the so-called "left" to get its message out none of that would be happening.
 
Top