Mukesh Sharma
Foundation of Hinduism
What is the difference between Religion and Spirituality?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
As far as I can tell: religion gets tax breaks and spirituality (outside of religion) doesn't. AFAICT, that's the only difference.What is the difference between Religion and Spirituality?
What is the difference between Religion and Spirituality?
What is the difference between Religion and Spirituality?
What is the difference between Religion and Spirituality?
What is the difference between Religion and Spirituality?
Spirituality is a part of religion. in Orthodoxy, spiritual is that of the holy spirit.What is the difference between Religion and Spirituality?
Perhaps religions are more institutionalized. But in my view, revealed religions and revealed spiritual paths are not trustworthy sources of knowledge and truth. So in this regard, they are both useless. Better to stick with philosophical reflection than revealed knowledge.What is the difference between Religion and Spirituality?
All you are really saying is that you consider yourself a better spiritual source than one of the great sages that have stood the test of time. Personally I would never put myself on par with such wisdom, despite its errors, because I simply know that I would do worse.Perhaps religions are more institutionalized. But in my view, revealed religions and revealed spiritual paths are not trustworthy sources of knowledge and truth. So in this regard, they are both useless. Better to stick with philosophical reflection than revealed knowledge.
Which great sage should I believe? They all wildly contradict. And the scientific method generates provable truth, so this is what I use as the basis for my views. The great sages can't prove anything they say which is why I claim that the structure and functioning of the spiritual realm is inherently unknowable. That's really about all I claim: (1) that there is a spiritual realm containing everything non-physical (such as the subjective experience of consciousness and its contents), and (2) that it is unknowable as I mentioned. The great sages say a lot more than this, and therefore, render themselves untrustworthy sources of truth and knowledge.All you are really saying is that you consider yourself a better spiritual source than one of the great sages that have stood the test of time. Personally I would never put myself on par with such wisdom, despite its errors, because I simply know that I would do worse.
Take your pick of the sages. Any of them are wiser than you or I. And science simply doesn't answer the questions of morality and meaning that religion does. We owe it to ourselves to do our homework in these matters.Which great sage should I believe? They all wildly contradict. And the scientific method generates provable truth, so this is what I use as the basis for my views. The great sages can't prove anything they say which is why I claim that the structure and functioning of the spiritual realm is inherently unknowable. That's really about all I claim: (1) that there is a spiritual realm containing everything non-physical (such as the subjective experience of consciousness and its contents), and (2) that it is unknowable as I mentioned. The great sages say a lot more than this, and therefore, render themselves untrustworthy sources of truth and knowledge.