One on those I have been told is bliss."Innocence" is a synonym for "ignorance." They mean the same thing, but emotional connotations are different.
So why is one desirable and the other undesirable?
But I don’t know.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
One on those I have been told is bliss."Innocence" is a synonym for "ignorance." They mean the same thing, but emotional connotations are different.
So why is one desirable and the other undesirable?
OK. I'll adjust it to reflect with yourNo one is "requiring nudity". Thank you for failing to justify your position.
When I was 10 I was reading Playboy.
I was 10. Yes, I was actually reading it. Wondering what all the fuss was about.“Reading”
As said to me the other day in another forum....Except that it's still here and available to those who wish to view it, and anyone here who would have a problem with nudity would likely be the sort who would also take issue with these books. It's a warning, not a ban, so the equivalent would be the book having warnings, which they may already have.
Do you agree with this Spanish minister?What shocks adults is not what shocks children. What we should be shocked by is learned, not natural.
To a child, everything is new and strange. Sorting out the shocking from the mundane is part of growing up. Don't let your own hang-ups pass to your children.
Teaching a three year old that a frog is disgusting, blacks are unclean, or sexual intercourse more shocking than eating, does not instill healthy values.
Sex education is a child's right, regardless of his/her family. Because all the children in this country have the right to know their own body, and to know that no adult can touch their body, unless they want them to. Unless they want them to. And that that is a form of violence.
They have the right to know that they have the right to have sex with whomever they want, which is based upon consent, of course.
And these are recognized rights.
The text under the video, is that a translation? Looks a bit wonky.Do you agree with this Spanish minister?
Sex education is a child's right, regardless of his/her family. Because all the children in this country have the right to know their own body, and to know that no adult can't touch their body, unless they want them to. Unless the want them to. And that would be a form of violence.
They have the right to know that they have the right to have sex with whomever they want, which is based upon consent, of course.
And these are recognized rights.
(I am disgusted and horrified)
The text under the video, is that a translation? Looks a bit wonky.
Because if so, then I’d say that I’d agree with her.
Sex education is a child’s right and should be the responsibility of not only the parents but the community and schools.
After all, studies routinely show that comprehensive science based sex education reduces the risks of sexual abuse and assault.
Ahh fair enoughYes, I translated it. Spanish is my second language. I can speak Spanish fluently and I understand it perfectly.
She seems a bit too passionate and her speech is not as linear as it should be.
Perhaps her enthusiasm is making her misspeak? (If I were to give her the benefit of the doubt.)Of course sex education is a child's right. But she goes even further.
She says that children can have sex with whomever they want. They only need to give their consent.
The word she uses is children (boys and girls) which means prepubescents.
Because in Spanish high schoolers are called chicos. Chicos y chicas.
Yes, it is indeed disturbing. If you have Google Chrome, you can translate the page of the comments on YouTube.Perhaps her enthusiasm is making her misspeak? (If I were to give her the benefit of the doubt.)
Otherwise that is indeed disturbing
That said, I do know that children do tend to experiment somewhat. Not saying I like that that happens, obviously.
But it’s actually a well known side affect of sexual abuse that a victim may mimic the behaviour with a peer, in an attempt to understand what happened to them. For example.
Of course sex education can potentially reduce such instances as well. Or at the very least give a victim enough confidence to seek help if such an incident does occur.
InterestingYes, it is indeed disturbing. If you have Google Chrome, you can translate the page of the comments on YouTube.
They are all from shocked, mystified and disgusted people.
You present the information. They absorb what they can. As they mature, they absorb more. Gradually, they sort the world out.As said to me the other day in another forum....
"These kids that we have to teach and remind not to eat crayons, boogers and tide pods, are they really ready and at the age to learn about sex, gender, LGBTQIA, etc."
So lets start them on physics at 5 right?You present the information. They absorb what they can. As they mature, they absorb more. Gradually, they sort the world out.
Wait, what? Kramer?I love that documentary. Amazingly the actor that played Kramer in Seinfeld is in it.
Right. I mean, my grandparents both grew up in a one room house with like, 6+ siblings each, that all shared a bed And a bathtub. (My grandmother was the baby you didn't want to accidentally throw out with the bath water).Why? How does it harm them? Through 99% of human history children witnessed nudity and sexual congress regularly, It isn't reported to have harmed them.
What's harmful to children is not a matter of opinion. What do the experts say about it?
You tell me:Wait, what? Kramer?
I agree with the text underneath the video:Do you agree with this Spanish minister?
Translation
(I am disgusted and horrified)
The spoiler tag exists to cater to the same sort of prude who would object to these books.It's would seem RF has established the limits on what ought to be in a school and on this forum.
RF has a spoiler requirement, and schools need that 'special locked shelf' only accessible with parents permission.
Issue solved.
I don't seem to have taken it the way you have.Yes, I translated it. Spanish is my second language. I can speak Spanish fluently and I understand it perfectly.
She seems a bit too passionate and her speech is not as linear as it should be.
Of course sex education is a child's right. But she goes even further.
She says that children can have sex with whomever they want. They only need to give their consent.
The word she uses is children (boys and girls) which means prepubescents.
Because in Spanish high schoolers are called chicos. Chicos y chicas.
Oh wow! How have I never noticed that before?!You tell me:
EDIT: It is only 12 seconds long. Watch it for the full effect. Kramer is immortal!!