It may be simple for you to ignore God in creation, but it is simpler not to.
I wasn't going for simple. I was going for correct, which can be more difficult, but is worth the effort. Atheism requires intelligence and courage. What is easy is to accept the first holy book thrown into your playpen, and just believe that.
To the believer, the secular humanist says rise from your knees, cease groveling and calling yourself an unworthy worm in the eyes of an angry god, shed your magical thinking, stand up with pride like the bipedal ape you were born to be, and take your proper place in the cosmos..
Shed the comforting but disabling swaddling of religious belief, and look out into the universe, which may be almost empty, and which may contain no gods at all.
That may be terrifying to the person who has never tried it, but if you're still young and adaptable enough, the existential crisis will pass, and a new and enabling sense of self and one's place in the scheme of things will emerge.
Face and accept the very real possibility that we may be all there is for light years, and that things don't get better if we don't make them better.
Accept that you may be vulnerable and not watched over.
Accept the likelihood of your own mortality and finititude.
Accept the reality of your insignificance everywhere but earth, and that you might be unloved except by some of those around you.
Because as far as we know, that's how it is.
Or choose easy.
Nothing useful comes from your fables.
I've already posted this to you, but apparently, it made no impact:
"
You stare into your high definition plasma screen monitor from the comfort or your air conditioned and electrically lighted home, type into your cordless keyboard then hit enter, which causes your computer to convert all that visual data into a binary signal that's processed by millions of precise circuits.
"This is then converted to a frequency modulated signal to reach your wireless router where it is then converted to light waves and sent along a large fiber optics cable to be processed by a super computer on a mass server.
"This sends that bit you typed to a satellite orbiting the earth that was put there through the greatest feats of engineering and science, all so it could go back through a similar pathway to make it all the way here to my computer monitor 15,000 miles away from you just so you could say, "Science is all a bunch of man made hogwash."- anon.
Do you not have any sense of the message you send when you rail against science using science?
No idea what ID has done or not.
It embarrassed Christianity further. There was a very fascinating trial iin which intelligent design was found to be religious pseudoscience. Several reputations were damaged. most notably Micheal Behe's. Dembski got pretty dinged up for tucking tail and running from the trial after some tough talk.
Science works. It's working for both of us right now.
Magical thinking doesn't work. Prayer is inefficacious. You can put that Bible to no good use. There is nothing in there that can be used for anything.
And as I've explained to you before, that is the sine qua non of a correct idea. If an idea can be used better than competing ideas to predict outcomes, there is nothing else one needs to do to consider the idea correct and add it to his fund of useful ideas, or knowledge.
If that isn't how you approach reality, then what use are your ideas to others (or you)? This is pretty basic. If belief B leads to action A that results in desired outcome D, it's a keeper, and can be called whatever you call ideas that cork - correct, fact, knowledge, or truth.
You have religion and believe it.
I don't need religion. I've learned to navigate the world comfortably without it.
That seems to miff a lot of believers. They seem to resent that some people are happy outside religion, so they mean-spiritedly attempt to insult atheists by calling unbelief religion. You are only derogating actual religion.
The continents did move even your religion knows that.
The Christian Bible makes no mention of continental drift. You would have no such concept without my "religion." Yours was no help.
Yes, and you can thank science again for that understanding, which was also unknown to the bible writers.
Right beyond where the stars were created was water.
This is what is wrong with faith-based thought. You've gone off the rails. I've recently provided the example of adding a column of numbers, which can only be done properly by the rigorous application of reason (arithmetic). Do it according to the rules of adding, and you will get a correct sum. One false step - just one - and you've gone off the rails. Do it by faith and you end up with nonsense, like that comment above.
Only in our present nature does DNA function and behave as we see it today.
More magical thinking. You just want something to be true, tell yourself it is, then believe that. This allows you to believe wrong ideas. This is how they get into your head.
DNA functions according to the relevant physical laws, which we can say with confidence have been constant since the earliest instants of the universe to within very narrow limits. We can visualize distant events that took place near the beginning of time.such as galaxy and star formation, which seem to obey the same rules we see today operating in our galaxy today.
We see the same spectral emission lines from the same atoms whose electrons were jumping from the same shells in exactly the same manner then as now. These kinds of findings as well as the confirmed predictions of the Big Bang theory are what put those very tight limits on how much the laws of physics could have changed.