I believe even the most logical mind requires "intuition" to invent hypotheses and design experiment. Some people operate almost only on logic and some almost only on intuition. I'm among the latter. As a child I was the former but I wasn't extremely good at it so switched.
The advantage of intuition is that it's far faster but the disadvantages are apparent to all.
Oh, I am certainly not saying that intuition is unimportant. It is absolutely crucial for coming up with new ideas and new things to play with. Even in the 'logical' arena of mathematics, intuition is vital.
However it is a particularly bad way to get *knowledge*. It *always* needs to be tested and verified. I'd say intuition is more often correct in most situations where someone has previous knowledge of things that are similar and is often really, really bad outside of that narrow range.
Again, this is true even in the 'logical' area of math: there are a large number of provable statements that are very counter to intuition. Alternatively, there are a great number of intuitive statements that are quite difficult to prove.
Of course, logic also needs to be tested and verified: mostly logic is applied to some model and the model needs to be tested and verified as well.