Altfish
Veteran Member
Chill out, it is a forum, nothing matters on here.No. You didn't actually answer and that is what matters.
Remind me, what was the question?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Chill out, it is a forum, nothing matters on here.No. You didn't actually answer and that is what matters.
Chill out, it is a forum, nothing matters on here.
Remind me, what was the question?
Ah, I remember and I made no such claim.How does science answer what is outside the universe? Time, space and all that. You claimed science could do it, but you didn't explain how?
Emotions? I have no emotions when I debate such things. What I might deploy as a tactical device, is exploiting the emotions of my opponent. Did I, with you?Okay, you win. And you used emotions. So you also win on that one.
Ah, I remember and I made no such claim.
It was to do with what came before the Big Bang and I said science was looking into it - or words to that effect.
Well they are, don't ask me how, I don't know as I am not an astro-physician, that's why I jokingly said Big Binoculars
Emotions? I have no emotions when I debate such things. What I might deploy as a tactical device, is exploiting the emotions of my opponent. Did I, with you?
Ciao
- viole
I would say "you were more than welcome", if that was a reply to a question. So, what question did I answer?Thank you for your answer.
Not true. Yes philosophers are thinking about it but so are scientists.Well, they are and they aren't. Because some scientist claim that they can and others claim they can't and that it is not science, but philosophy. So that is the point. Science is not looking to it. Because it is not science to all scientists.
I would say "you were more than welcome", if that was a reply to a question. So, what question did I answer?
Ciao
- viole
Not true. Yes philosophers are thinking about it but so are scientists.
Scientists May Have Identified What Existed Before Our Universe (mysteriousuniverse.org)
What happened before the Big Bang? | Live Science
Yes, they may say that. BUT YOU SAID, scientists were NOT looking into it. You've just contradicted yourself.Yes and some scientists say we can't know what happened before the Big Bang. Try searching for quotes from actual scientists from both sides. They are there.
Which would be wise, since I have been diagnosed with Asperger when I was 12.That you don't use emotions yourself, you only use them to get a reaction out of other people. Why you don't that, I can't understand unless it gives you some useful emotion. So that answer is that you are not normal like me, but we are both neurodiverse. So I will treat you differently than the neurotypical.
Yes, they may say that. BUT YOU SAID, scientists were NOT looking into it. You've just contradicted yourself.
Make your mind up
Which would be wise, since I have been diagnosed with Asperger when I was 12.
And I suspect that is not neurotypical.
Yet.
Ciao
- viole
I wonder how it is logically possible to have not found one's way. Since everybody has a way, it is a truism that they found it.Well, we are a strange lot. Hope you cope and have found your way.
I wonder how it is logically possible to have not found one's way. Since everybody has a way, it is a truism that they found it.
So, I am not sure what you mean.
Ciao
- viole
Well, I couldn't find my way at first, so I tried to do what others told mine. Not all people live their way, they live based on what others tell them to do.
Eyes are not the only way to observeSorry, they are not looking as per observation, because there is at current nothing to observe.
Eyes are not the only way to observe
I only mentioned 'what happened before the Big Bang' you've invented this stuff about me saying something not in the universe.No, but all observations only take place in the universe. So if you assume you can observe something not in the universe, you have to explain how to do it and not just claim it. I.e. give evidence in some sense of how to do it.