questfortruth
Well-Known Member
Question: Just how far above Earth does this vast dome extend, and what the heck are these waters that lie above it?
Answer: The radius of Observable Universe, waters above the firmament might be another word for Spiritual Food and Drink, Spiritual Wisdom. The spatial shape I prove below dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 is totally flat, just the Pythagorean theorem. One should show, that also the temporal geometry near Earth is totally Flat: -c^2 dt^2+dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2. From it comes the intuitive and Biblical feeling, that the material, earthly world must be Flat: not "Flat Earth", but "Flat at Earth".
Q: So the spiritual food and drink flooded the world when God opened the windows of the heavens?
A: On the way down it was transformed into literal water. It is like Dark Matter -- Baryon Matter transition, which can solve the Cosmology Crisis, about which is the video in the thread. Remember how Jesus turned water into wine? Basically, He created wine from nothing.
Q: i.e. it is magic and will magically be whatever you want it to be without any reason? This is why religious nonsense has no place in rational debate.
A: Wrong word choice. Use word wonder, use word miracle. God is not satan.
How the dating games and the female logic rational? Love seems to be irrational, intuitive.
Q: until God is not officially proven, the connection of Theology and Science must be forbidden by state police!!! As they have done in Iceland: Iceland Declares All Religions Are Weapons Of Mass Destruction
A: God is proven here: scientific word for Biblical Filament in Genesis 1: Universe in the Nutshell
Q: (Genesis 1:14-16 KJV) This verse says that the Sun, Moon, and Stars=planets of our solar system, are "within" the firmament?
No, this verse relates to human perspective. People see, that stars (even Sun) are so far away, that they appear to be inside the firmament. But firmament is the edge of Observable Universe in my unpublished theories.
PROOF:
Does the large scale structure of our Universe fit into metric
ds^2=-A(r,t) dt^2+dx^2+dy^2+dz^2 ?
There is Baryonic matter ("mass"). It satisfies the Einstein Equations in the presence of Dark Matter. Just describe the Dark Matter by an arbitrary energy-momentum tensor [Dark Energy then is the special class of Dark Matter.] Even such, which violates energy conditions. Nobody will notice violation: Dark Matter does not directly interact with Baryonic matter. I have written the book about it, but book is about 50 USD. Nobody has read it.
Perhaps, A(r,t)=h(r). The h(r) is not zero to count for cosmological red-shift and its acceleration with spatial distance. Look: we have never found the temporal acceleration, because the observation period with modern technologies is only 20 years. [We calculate the t-derivative of the scale a(t) of Universe NOT by comparing different years passed on Earth, but by spatial investigations of the Heavens. Because the further galaxy is, the more distant it in the past time. But not the Earth's time! Only the Universe abstract time t. But latter is determined by the model we use. Let us construct Biblical model!]
At the edge of the Universe then A(E(t),t)=0 for any t to have nothingness outside the Universe.
The Alfa of Universe has A(r,t=0)=0, for any 0<r<E(t=0) the Omega has A(r,t=T)=0, for any 0<r<E(t=T). Thus, it is expected, that A(r,t)=F(t) h(r). The F(t) is zero for t<0 and t>T, otherwise it is 1 (because one can be transformed into 1 by coordinate transformations). To make start the Universe from the single point, one writes: E(t=0)=0. For bodies to never reach the edge, one writes E = E(t=0) + t.
Evidence in favour: the Hubble constant calculated by two methods: 1. current observations, 2. evolution of the cosmos in Friedmann metric, does not coincide:
Hsin-Yu Chen, Maya Fishbach, Daniel E. Holz, A two per cent Hubble constant measurement from standard sirens within five years, Nature 562, 545-547 (2018), Anil Ananthaswamy, "Best-Yet Measurements Deepen Cosmological Crisis. The latest disagreement over the universe's expansion rate suggests researchers may be on the threshold of revolutionary discoveries'', Scientific American, March 22, 2019.
The Science cannot ever be settled, and so different scientific models should be investigated. Therefore, with the support of a generous private grant, I would match the function h(r) with accelerated expansion, hereby, I hope, would result, that at h(r = E[t=2019AC])=0 the Metagalaxy (observable Universe) is the entire Universe.
The Big Bang contradicts my model, but Big Bang is disproved here: P. Herouni, Measured Parameters of Large Antenna of ROT-54/2.6 Tell about Absence of Big Bang Journal of Astrophysics: Reports. — National Academy of Sciences of Armenia 2007, v. 107, no. 1. 73-78
Answer: The radius of Observable Universe, waters above the firmament might be another word for Spiritual Food and Drink, Spiritual Wisdom. The spatial shape I prove below dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 is totally flat, just the Pythagorean theorem. One should show, that also the temporal geometry near Earth is totally Flat: -c^2 dt^2+dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2. From it comes the intuitive and Biblical feeling, that the material, earthly world must be Flat: not "Flat Earth", but "Flat at Earth".
Q: So the spiritual food and drink flooded the world when God opened the windows of the heavens?
A: On the way down it was transformed into literal water. It is like Dark Matter -- Baryon Matter transition, which can solve the Cosmology Crisis, about which is the video in the thread. Remember how Jesus turned water into wine? Basically, He created wine from nothing.
Q: i.e. it is magic and will magically be whatever you want it to be without any reason? This is why religious nonsense has no place in rational debate.
A: Wrong word choice. Use word wonder, use word miracle. God is not satan.
How the dating games and the female logic rational? Love seems to be irrational, intuitive.
Q: until God is not officially proven, the connection of Theology and Science must be forbidden by state police!!! As they have done in Iceland: Iceland Declares All Religions Are Weapons Of Mass Destruction
A: God is proven here: scientific word for Biblical Filament in Genesis 1: Universe in the Nutshell
Q: (Genesis 1:14-16 KJV) This verse says that the Sun, Moon, and Stars=planets of our solar system, are "within" the firmament?
No, this verse relates to human perspective. People see, that stars (even Sun) are so far away, that they appear to be inside the firmament. But firmament is the edge of Observable Universe in my unpublished theories.
PROOF:
Does the large scale structure of our Universe fit into metric
ds^2=-A(r,t) dt^2+dx^2+dy^2+dz^2 ?
There is Baryonic matter ("mass"). It satisfies the Einstein Equations in the presence of Dark Matter. Just describe the Dark Matter by an arbitrary energy-momentum tensor [Dark Energy then is the special class of Dark Matter.] Even such, which violates energy conditions. Nobody will notice violation: Dark Matter does not directly interact with Baryonic matter. I have written the book about it, but book is about 50 USD. Nobody has read it.
Perhaps, A(r,t)=h(r). The h(r) is not zero to count for cosmological red-shift and its acceleration with spatial distance. Look: we have never found the temporal acceleration, because the observation period with modern technologies is only 20 years. [We calculate the t-derivative of the scale a(t) of Universe NOT by comparing different years passed on Earth, but by spatial investigations of the Heavens. Because the further galaxy is, the more distant it in the past time. But not the Earth's time! Only the Universe abstract time t. But latter is determined by the model we use. Let us construct Biblical model!]
At the edge of the Universe then A(E(t),t)=0 for any t to have nothingness outside the Universe.
The Alfa of Universe has A(r,t=0)=0, for any 0<r<E(t=0) the Omega has A(r,t=T)=0, for any 0<r<E(t=T). Thus, it is expected, that A(r,t)=F(t) h(r). The F(t) is zero for t<0 and t>T, otherwise it is 1 (because one can be transformed into 1 by coordinate transformations). To make start the Universe from the single point, one writes: E(t=0)=0. For bodies to never reach the edge, one writes E = E(t=0) + t.
Evidence in favour: the Hubble constant calculated by two methods: 1. current observations, 2. evolution of the cosmos in Friedmann metric, does not coincide:
Hsin-Yu Chen, Maya Fishbach, Daniel E. Holz, A two per cent Hubble constant measurement from standard sirens within five years, Nature 562, 545-547 (2018), Anil Ananthaswamy, "Best-Yet Measurements Deepen Cosmological Crisis. The latest disagreement over the universe's expansion rate suggests researchers may be on the threshold of revolutionary discoveries'', Scientific American, March 22, 2019.
The Science cannot ever be settled, and so different scientific models should be investigated. Therefore, with the support of a generous private grant, I would match the function h(r) with accelerated expansion, hereby, I hope, would result, that at h(r = E[t=2019AC])=0 the Metagalaxy (observable Universe) is the entire Universe.
The Big Bang contradicts my model, but Big Bang is disproved here: P. Herouni, Measured Parameters of Large Antenna of ROT-54/2.6 Tell about Absence of Big Bang Journal of Astrophysics: Reports. — National Academy of Sciences of Armenia 2007, v. 107, no. 1. 73-78
Last edited:
