• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Scientology Was Purposefully Destroyed

Eternal Thetan

New Member
That is hardly a selling point; "I'm no crazier than any of the other psychiatric patients!". :cool:

Why not stop treating it as a religion at all and simply present you hypothesis and evidence without any of the rhetoric or propaganda? Science rather than Scientology.
Science is actually rediscovering a few of the thing LRH talked about in the 50s. The gap between the two will eventually close.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
These days, it is pretty common knowledge that the Church of Scientology is an abusive cult. As an Independent Scientologist, I do not believe it was meant to be this way. LRH stumbled onto what I believed is the next step in human evolution. Unfortunately, he was not infallible, and in many ways a terrible person. But his tech, the methodologies of Scientology, is good. I know they work from experience. Something has gone wrong, but what? Based on LRH's own writing, the CoS is not applying Scientology correctly. For example, LRH was clear that only phycosomantic illness could be cured via Dianetics. Somehow, the CoS states the Clear will not suffer from any diseases. This is verifiably wrong as many Clears have died from things like cancer. Why? Because it is an organic illness. Auditing will only help things caused by the reactive mind. If you smoke 24/7, an auditor can't remove an organic tumor in your lungs. So, why the divergence from source?

As you rediscover yourself via auditing, it because apparent that were/are sinister groups that have attempted to enslave and control us as spiritual beings. I have encountered this via implanted memories and traps in my memory banks. Knowing that someone or something would go as far as to implant fake memories, it is not a stretch to assume that they would go out of their way to destroy the first step towards humanity's freedom. David Miscaviage, who wasn't even supposed to be the successor, either was selected or compromised. The little tyrant is purposely trying to destroy the subject of Scientology, so we can't free ourselves. Unfortunately, it is working. The CoS's fall was not inevitable, but rather a deliberate attempt to destroy something that could help countless people.

I know a lot of you (if not all) will disagree with my view. I look forward to honest debate on this idea.

Note: I am 100% serious. I know this post is a lot to take in for non-Scientologists. I know it sounds delusional, but I don't think it is any crazier than most religious beliefs.

Well, I was also a former Scientologist. You can't understand the release of an engram without having experienced it.

Originally there was Dianetics which at most would cost you the price of a paperback. Experience the release of an engram is proof that something is there. Certainly as far as this lifetime goes it's reliable enough. However as far as past life memories go, I can't guarantee their reliability. And, there is scientific evidence that even memories from one's current life are not as reliable as we think they are.

I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm just saying I don't feel the same reliability in these past life memories as you seem to.

However it's about $14 dollars for the book Dianetics. that all you need to see if it is something that works for you.
 

HonestJoe

Well-Known Member
Science is actually rediscovering a few of the thing LRH talked about in the 50s. The gap between the two will eventually close.
The whole idea of there being a gap to close still demonstrates the flawed viewpoint. There is nothing special about any ideas just because Hubbard talked about them or they were incorporated in to the concepts of Scientology. And if some of those ideas are subsequently revisited by other people applying actual scientific method, that doesn't validate or close any gaps for Scientology as a whole.
 
Top