• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Scotland votes to end exports of tear gas and rubber bullets to the U.S.

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
bagpipes and haggis

Break it up or we'll put you in the slammer and feed you haggis. And as an earnest of our intent, we are warning you that we're armed and practiced and ready to go (at least in the great State of Massachusetts)

 

BSM1

What? Me worry?
Yep. If the cops weren't able to fire "less lethal" weapons at these people standing on their porch trying to figure out what was going on, they would have had to shoot them with bullets.

o_O

‘Light ‘Em Up!’: Video Appears To Show Law Enforcement Shooting Paint Rounds At Mpls. Residents On Their Porch


You do realize the cops were using paint balls and not rubber bullets in this case. If you were standing outside (for obviously no apparent reason) when ordered to stay inside for the safety of everyone during the time of civil unrest, then maybe you should expect some form on "motivation" to comply.
 

BSM1

What? Me worry?
I'm not trying to muddy anything. Quite the opposite.
How the heck is my question muddying anything?

It was a request for clarification. Sounded to me like the suggestion was that rubber bullets were only used in cases where civilians attacked police. That matches the rules of engagement in place in Northern Ireland where they were used.

But I don't believe that has been the case in the US.

And Northern Ireland proved that rubber bullets can be fatal.
(17 deaths attributed to them)


Then, for clarification, you might want to cite a specific case for us to discuss.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
You do realize the cops were using paint balls and not rubber bullets in this case.
Yep. Rubber bullets would be worse, but even paintballs have the potential to seriously injure someone. Good thing they didn't connect with anyone in the face (on that porch, at least).

If you were standing outside (for obviously no apparent reason) when ordered to stay inside for the safety of everyone during the time of civil unrest, then maybe you should expect some form on "motivation" to comply.
Should you need to have a reason to be on your porch?

How do you feel about castle doctrine?
 

BSM1

What? Me worry?
Yep. Rubber bullets would be worse, but even paintballs have the potential to seriously injure someone. Good thing they didn't connect with anyone in the face (on that porch, at least).


Should you need to have a reason to be on your porch?

How do you feel about castle doctrine?


Would you honestly feel the same if these were Klan members flouting a curfew and taunting the police?
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Then, for clarification, you might want to cite a specific case for us to discuss.

Why?
I was asking someone else if they believed police were using rubber bullets only in response to violence. I received no clarification.

Are you now suggesting police have been using rubber bullets only in response to violence?
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Why?
I was asking someone else if they believed police were using rubber bullets only in response to violence. I received no clarification.

Are you now suggesting police have been using rubber bullets only in response to violence?
Police tend to spray bullets and gas in the general direction of people they perceive as unruly or behaving improperly. They don't reserve their ministrations to those breaking windows.
They'll also indiscriminately sweep up anyone in the area of a protest and haul them off to jail.

If the police were rendered less able to use violence to restore order, they might be more careful not to cause the disorder in the first place. It's usually the police who escalate confrontations to violence.

Police need to be more concerned with law and less with order. The two things that trigger anger in police are disorderly behavior, like protesting, and disrespect. Not all crowds need to be controlled.

They are not warriors. It's not us vs them. Their job is to protect and serve.
 

BSM1

What? Me worry?
Why?
I was asking someone else if they believed police were using rubber bullets only in response to violence. I received no clarification.

Are you now suggesting police have been using rubber bullets only in response to violence?

I wasn't suggesting anything except that rubber bullets are preferable to real bullets.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
You do realize the cops were using paint balls and not rubber bullets in this case. If you were standing outside (for obviously no apparent reason) when ordered to stay inside for the safety of everyone during the time of civil unrest, then maybe you should expect some form on "motivation" to comply.
Yeah the paintballs was actually a stellar idea. A bit like the explosive bank dye bag.

The police can mark the real troublemakers and get them placed under arrest.
 

BSM1

What? Me worry?
I notice you didn't answer my question: how do you feel about castle doctrine?
I believe the "castle" doctrine does not, by definition, extend out to a police controlled situation outside your house. Or are you saying that as long as I am within the vicinity of my house, I am free to do as I please?
 
Top