• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

SCSPL Computer Language

Ostronomos

Well-Known Member
Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language was stated this way:

Now, SCSPL is based on concepts cybernetics, automata and extension of communication models (Shannon's) to come up with Telic Feedback and mechanisms of employing the so-called generalized utility to achieve maximal cosmic self-realization and refinement.

Put simply, computation is used to model discrete systems and in doing this, one has to study membership, subsets, unions, intersections, complement, difference relations, symmetric differences. boolean algebra, Venn diagrams, self-similarity (especially when looking at fractal systems) etc.
These are concepts Langan heavily uses in constructing the CTMU and principles like MAP, syndiffeonesis, unisections, MU and others come to mind.

Under automation, when one looks at context-free languages in comparison to Langan's arguments concerning 'emergence' like when it comes to the idea of telic - ie pre-informational, pre-nomological and pre-syntactical phase of reality and the idea of reality emerging from the UBT.
About protocomputationability and about constraints emerging from a realm that is free of them etc, there seems to be a link especially considering self-organization of cellular automata from initially 'disordered' states.


Here is another excerpt:

Empirical/physical realty is not the foundation in the CTMU model; it is a part of the self-simulation of SCSPL reality. Page 42 of Langan's A New Kind of Reality Theory paper states "in effect, the universe becomes a 'self-simulation' running inside its own contents."”

Most of you are too dumb to comprehend the ctmu. But just to let you know, it beats the Cartesian mind/body dualism. It also uses the self-similarity concept to describe the fractal nature of the universe. I believe this would be termed hology. In the absolute truth of this author's mind, we can answer some of the most profound problems in mathematics (a reality unto itself). Mathematics governs the universe. It is a powerfully explanatory language that is shared among all minds. The predicates "real" and "unreal" are the grounds for a new meta-logic required by the ctmu if my theory is correct.
 

Ostronomos

Well-Known Member
A quick word on morality. As humans we all wrestle with questions of morality. So I will comment on it as it is relevant to the human experience.

We as humans are driven by unseen forces (such as instinct and intellect) to explore our nature or our "human-ness." But this in no way excludes the possibility of a God or as I like to say, our imperfections are not incompatible with a God. Many live under the delusion that the Biblical concept of sin or their lack of spiritual experience is somehow reasonable grounds to dismiss this abstract concept of a God, but that is by all means false. Omnipotence exists prior to our meager existence. God is well beyond the physical realm and is subtle in nature. He cannot affect the material dynamic of our universe which means He cannot miraculously prevent a flood from wiping out a hundred people or a child from dying of cancer (I know I paint a grim picture). However, He reigns most supreme over the higher levels of reality, which we interact with in either dreams or through mind expansion.
 
Last edited:
Top