• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Secrets of an Earlier Universe Revealed by Red-Supergiant Supernova

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
There have been possible evidence of an earlier universe, but it was not confirmed. But this evidence of an exploding Red Super Giant 2 billion years after the beginning of our universe is possibly may confirm the existence of an earlier universe, but yes, I believe it it's a maybe . . .

[cite=[URL="https://scitechdaily.com/secrets-of-an-earlier-universe-revealed-by-red-supergiant-supernova/"]Secrets of an Earlier Universe Revealed by Red-Supergiant Supernova[/URL]]

Secrets of an Earlier Universe Revealed by Red-Supergiant Supernova

Detailed telescope images help scientists learn more about the Universe two billion years after the Big Bang.


An international research team has measured the size of a star dating back 2 billion years after the Big Bang, or more than 11 billion years ago. Detailed images show the exploding star cooling and could help scientists learn more about the stars and galaxies that existed in the early Universe.

Led by researchers at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities, the study was published recently in Nature, the world’s leading peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary science journal.

“This is the first detailed look at a supernova at a much earlier epoch of the Universe’s evolution,” said Patrick Kelly, a lead author of the paper and an associate professor in the University of Minnesota School of Physics and Astronomy. “It’s very exciting because we can learn in detail about an individual star when the Universe was less than a fifth of its current age, and begin to understand if the stars that existed many billions of years ago are different from the ones nearby.”

The red supergiant in question was about 500 times larger than the sun, and it’s located at redshift three, which is about 60 times farther away than any other supernova observed in this detail.

Supernova-Behind-Galaxy-Cluster-Abell-370-777x848.jpg

An international research team led by the University of Minnesota Twin Cities has measured the size of a star dating back more than 11 billion years ago using images that show the evolution of the star exploding and cooling. The above image shows the light from the supernova behind the galaxy cluster Abell 370. Credit: Wenlei Chen, NASA

Using data from the Hubble Space Telescope with follow-up spectroscopy using the University of Minnesota’s access to the Large Binocular Telescope, the researchers were able to identify multiple detailed images of the red supergiant because of a phenomenon called gravitational lensing, where mass, such as that in a galaxy, bends light. This magnifies the light emitted from the star.

“The gravitational lens acts as a natural magnifying glass and multiplies Hubble’s power by a factor of eight,” Kelly said. “Here, we see three images. Even though they can be seen at the same time, they show the supernova as it was at different ages separated by several days. We see the supernova rapidly cooling, which allows us to basically reconstruct what happened and study how the supernova cooled in its first few days with just one set of images. It enables us to see a rerun of a supernova.”

The researchers combined this discovery with another one of Kelly’s supernova discoveries from 2014 to estimate how many stars were exploding when the Universe was a small fraction of its current age. They found that there were likely many more supernovae than previously thought.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
There have been possible evidence of an earlier universe, but it was not confirmed. But this evidence of an exploding Red Super Giant 2 billion years after the beginning of our universe is possibly may confirm the existence of an earlier universe, but yes, I believe it it's a maybe . . .

[cite=[URL="https://scitechdaily.com/secrets-of-an-earlier-universe-revealed-by-red-supergiant-supernova/"]Secrets of an Earlier Universe Revealed by Red-Supergiant Supernova[/URL]]

Secrets of an Earlier Universe Revealed by Red-Supergiant Supernova

Detailed telescope images help scientists learn more about the Universe two billion years after the Big Bang.


An international research team has measured the size of a star dating back 2 billion years after the Big Bang, or more than 11 billion years ago. Detailed images show the exploding star cooling and could help scientists learn more about the stars and galaxies that existed in the early Universe.

Led by researchers at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities, the study was published recently in Nature, the world’s leading peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary science journal.

“This is the first detailed look at a supernova at a much earlier epoch of the Universe’s evolution,” said Patrick Kelly, a lead author of the paper and an associate professor in the University of Minnesota School of Physics and Astronomy. “It’s very exciting because we can learn in detail about an individual star when the Universe was less than a fifth of its current age, and begin to understand if the stars that existed many billions of years ago are different from the ones nearby.”

The red supergiant in question was about 500 times larger than the sun, and it’s located at redshift three, which is about 60 times farther away than any other supernova observed in this detail.

Supernova-Behind-Galaxy-Cluster-Abell-370-777x848.jpg

An international research team led by the University of Minnesota Twin Cities has measured the size of a star dating back more than 11 billion years ago using images that show the evolution of the star exploding and cooling. The above image shows the light from the supernova behind the galaxy cluster Abell 370. Credit: Wenlei Chen, NASA

Using data from the Hubble Space Telescope with follow-up spectroscopy using the University of Minnesota’s access to the Large Binocular Telescope, the researchers were able to identify multiple detailed images of the red supergiant because of a phenomenon called gravitational lensing, where mass, such as that in a galaxy, bends light. This magnifies the light emitted from the star.

“The gravitational lens acts as a natural magnifying glass and multiplies Hubble’s power by a factor of eight,” Kelly said. “Here, we see three images. Even though they can be seen at the same time, they show the supernova as it was at different ages separated by several days. We see the supernova rapidly cooling, which allows us to basically reconstruct what happened and study how the supernova cooled in its first few days with just one set of images. It enables us to see a rerun of a supernova.”

The researchers combined this discovery with another one of Kelly’s supernova discoveries from 2014 to estimate how many stars were exploding when the Universe was a small fraction of its current age. They found that there were likely many more supernovae than previously thought.
Informative frube
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
Reading this mor carefully ir only gives some of the earliest evidence of stars and a supernova 2 billion years after the beginning expansion of the universe. It is unexplained how a star billions of years old would go supernova 2 billion years after the beginning of the expansion.
 

Astrophile

Active Member
Reading this mor carefully ir only gives some of the earliest evidence of stars and a supernova 2 billion years after the beginning expansion of the universe. It is unexplained how a star billions of years old would go supernova 2 billion years after the beginning of the expansion.
If this star was really a red supergiant (similar to Betelgeuse or Antares) before it exploded, it must have started its life as a massive O-type or early B-type star, perhaps around 20-30 solar masses, and had a life-span of about 10 million years, not billions of years.
 

gnostic

The Lost One
Reading this mor carefully ir only gives some of the earliest evidence of stars and a supernova 2 billion years after the beginning expansion of the universe. It is unexplained how a star billions of years old would go supernova 2 billion years after the beginning of the expansion.

from what I can tell, the more massive the star was, the faster it would consume all the hydrogen at the star’s core, converting them to heavier elements (nuclear fusion via either CNO cycle or the triple alpha Nucleosynthesis), the shorter the lifespan is the star. When such massive stars collapse earlier, they will go though supernova explosions.

Stars with similar mass as our Sun, will have much longer lifespan, the main sequence could last as many as 5 to 9 billion years, before they exhausted hydrogen at the cores.

Low mass stars, such as the red dwarfs will have even longer main sequence life, but as they fuse hydrogen at much lower rate, they are much cooler stars than the Sun. Red dwarfs are also not very luminous, and Proxima Centauri is one such red dwarf, where you cannot observe it naked eye.

So…

low mass star = low rate of fusion = longer main-sequence life (longer lifespan), eg red dwarf stars​
very high mass star = higher rate of fusion = short main-sequence life (shorter lifespan), eg any supergiant stars​

Our sun is a yellow dwarf, is in the middle, leaning more toward the low mass scale.

like @Astrophile said, a red supergiant star would only have lifespan of tens of millions years, not a billion or billions years old
 
Last edited:
Top