• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Seems it was an illegal that wanted to kill Biden.

Twilight Hue

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Lyndon said:
What BS from you, it says he's a legal resident with a green card, what your headline should say is Nazi sympathizer attacks White house, except you don't seem to have a problem with nazi ideology
Click to expand...
Apparently, it seems, you don't read

I specified "It seems"... as per my title for this thread. I read about the green card as well.

And it isn't my BS. Not from from me. That 'BS' needs to be directed towards the author of the NBC colum.

Apparently, it seems, you can't tell who wrote what either.

I just committed on how we live in bizarre times.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Twilight Hue said:
Apparently, it seems, you don't read

I specified "It seems"... as per my title for this thread. I read about the green card as well.

And it isn't my BS. Not from from me. That 'BS' needs to be directed towards the author of the NBC colum.

Apparently, it seems, you can't tell who wrote what either.

I just committed on how we live in bizarre times.
Click to expand...
There is no "seems" about it. You had to misinterpret that article in an extremely odd way to come to such a conclusion. If you stopped reading the article after this:

"A government prosecutor told the court that Kandula is not a citizen or lawful permanent resident."

That would explain your confusion. But it would have had to be extreme sloppiness. Not even the title of the article implies that he was not here legally. Why assume that anyone from another country is here illegally?

But as I was saying what you posted was extremely sloppy at best because the article goes on and immediately refutes that paragraph:

"But later on Wednesday, a Department of Justice official clarified the open-court remarks and said Kandula does hold a green card for lawful, permanent U.S. residency."

Your excuse just does not fly.
 
Twilight Hue

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Subduction Zone said:
There is no "seems" about it. You had to misinterpret that article in an extremely odd way to come to such a conclusion. If you stopped reading the article after this:

"A government prosecutor told the court that Kandula is not a citizen or lawful permanent resident."

That would explain your confusion. But it would have had to be extreme sloppiness. Not even the title of the article implies that he was not here legally. Why assume that anyone from another country is here illegally?

But as I was saying what you posted was extremely sloppy at best because the article goes on and immediately refutes that paragraph:

"But later on Wednesday, a Department of Justice official clarified the open-court remarks and said Kandula does hold a green card for lawful, permanent U.S. residency."

Your excuse just does not fly.
Click to expand...
No. The prosecutor is your target.

The article continues that this individual can face deportation out of the country.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Twilight Hue said:
No. The prosecutor is your target.

The article continues that this individual can face deportation out of the country.
Click to expand...
Nope. He may have made a mistake but that was corrected. You were the one that made the false claim even though your own article refuted what you said in the OP.

When you screw up in such a huge way the best thing to do is to simply own up to your error. When you do that people will usually let you of of the hook.
 
Twilight Hue

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Subduction Zone said:
Nope. He may have made a mistake but that was corrected. You were the one that made the false claim even though your own article refuted what you said in the OP.

When you screw up in such a huge way the best thing to do is to simply own up to your error. When you do that people will usually let you of of the hook.
Click to expand...
I made no false claim. I used the term "seems".

That means it may or may not be true.

However it's your false claim (highlhted in purple) that I made a claim in the first place. Nice try but I made no claim whatsoever.

I only commented on it being a bizarre time.

Why don't you own up you made a false allegation about me?
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Twilight Hue said:
I made no false claim. I used the term "seems".

That means it may or may not be true.

However it's your false claim (highlhted in purple) that I made a claim in the first place. Nice try bit I made no claim whatsoever.

I only commented on it being a bizarre time.
Click to expand...
And I corrected you on that. It does not seem that way at all. You could have said that before the correction was made, but the correction was in your article.


When you have dug a hole for yourself the first thing to to is to quit digging.
 
Twilight Hue

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Subduction Zone said:
And I corrected you on that. It does not seem that way at all. You could have said that before the correction was made, but the correction was in your article.


When you have dug a hole for yourself the first thing to to is to quit digging.
Click to expand...
No. Your making stuff up about me.

Oh, and it's not my article. I didn't write it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top