Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I think the real slap in the face to Biden and the dems was his choice to announce his final 'no' on Fox News. I do not understand his reasoning when his constituents are some of the neediest.
Over 10 years. That's 200 Billion a year. Which is paid for.2 Trillion+ plus taxes.
I don't deal with strawman issues.Over 10 years. That's 200 Billion a year. Which is paid for.
How about 7.5 Trillion? I'm sure you're fine with that number. That's what we spend on defense. Where you don't see any benefits. But corporations do. You know, a budget that kinda just vanishes.
Do you not take the problems and threat of climate change seriously?If they are anything like the FFA is.
I just take for granted they want 50 years for the red tape and bureaucracy to go through properly.
When you have guys like trump, Besos, and Musk paying almost no income taxes then the burden will fall on the average Joe citizen like us. Would you support tax laws that require these billionaires to pay at least something so the USA can afford to invest in infrastructure and its citizens?2 Trillion+ plus taxes.
Cost effective alternatives come when there is money to invest in research. That is how the market pushes innovations. Plus the oil lobby sure as hell is spending money (thanks to them limiting production and making more profits through inflation which is the free market at work) to get congress to slow down legislation for green energy.When the green becomes a ripe cost effective alternative, it will happen naturally. The interest on a runaway spending spree will kill the children before fossil fuel will have an effect.
When you have guys like trump, Besos, and Musk paying almost no income taxes then the burden will fall on the average Joe citizen like us. Would you support tax laws that require these billionaires to pay at least something so the USA can afford to invest in infrastructure and its citizens?
Cost effective alternatives come when there is money to invest in research. That is how the market pushes innovations. Plus the oil lobby sure as hell is spending money (thanks to them limiting production and making more profits through inflation which is the free market at work) to get congress to slow down legislation for green energy.
At what point is climate change going to be bad enough until conservatives acknowledge its a problem?
What is a few trillion dollars of renewable green energy investments compared to tens of trillions of dollars being spent on mass migrations due to global warming?When the green becomes a ripe cost effective alternative, it will happen naturally. The interest on a runaway spending spree will kill the children before fossil fuel will have an effect.
I am at a loss on how mass migration is due to global warming. Having gone to Honduras and other third world countries,,, global warming is not in the mix for the reason of migration.What is a few trillion dollars of renewable green energy investments compared to tens of trillions of dollars being spent on mass migrations due to global warming?
Did you support Trump's massive tax break that was unpaid for?I don't see it that way.
It would have passed if it had been the 1.2 bipartisan infrastructure bill. It is the 1.1 extra "put your children in debt" that killed the bill and gave life to my grandchildren.
Actually, it's a major contributor because of the drought hitting the Northern Triangle Countries. However, that's not the only reason.Having gone to Honduras and other third world countries,,, global warming is not in the mix for the reason of migration.
And that's the key, whereas the government has massive subsidies for the fossil fuels and farming interests. Shouldn't we be investing more in our kids than them? Is money more important than they?Cost effective alternatives come when there is money to invest in research. That is how the market pushes innovations. Plus the oil lobby sure as hell is spending money (thanks to them limiting production and making more profits through inflation which is the free market at work) to get congress to slow down legislation for green energy.
At what point is climate change going to be bad enough until conservatives acknowledge its a problem?
Please let us realize the United Nations has reported how global warming climate change is adversely impacting Latin America.I am at a loss on how mass migration is due to global warming. Having gone to Honduras and other third world countries,,, global warming is not in the mix for the reason of migration.
And 17 Nobel Prize winners in Economics have gone on record that it would benefit us in the long run, thus they're on-board as it would benefit millions of Americans and also stimulate the economy. But also the issue of climate change MUST be addressed, or we are really going to "mortgage our future" even according to our own DoD estimates.I have no idea why Americans are worried by the size of their national debt. There has been no chance at all, that it could ever be repaid. Adding a few trillion to it is neither here nor there. No government has ever tried to pay any of it off, and it now makes no difference to anyone. Neither you nor your children will ever be asked to settle it.
The interest on it is part of the base budget cost and has been since year dot.
When opponents are saying we can't pay for these social and infrastructure investments then how the super rich avoid paying taxes DOES have something to do with it. We ought to raise taxes on the wealthy and cut taxes on the middle class and spend money to fix our infrastructure.That has nothing to do with 2.3 Trillion dollar spending spree... that has to do with tax codes. Spending more money doesn't close loopholes.
So what we need is more citizens agreeing with your sentiment.So let's limit lobbying and not make corporations "people". Get corporations out of the voting booth.