• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should Incense be banned?

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
The title says it all, really. Or does it?
"Incense burning emits smoke containing particulate matter, gas products and other organic compounds and causes air pollution, airway disease and health problems. When incense smoke pollutants are inhaled, they cause airway dysfunction."
That and some people don't like the aroma. Based on these, should incense be banned?

Why or why not?
 

PureX

Veteran Member
The title says it all, really. Or does it?
"Incense burning emits smoke containing particulate matter, gas products and other organic compounds and causes air pollution, airway disease and health problems. When incense smoke pollutants are inhaled, they cause airway dysfunction."
That and some people don't like the aroma. Based on these, should incense be banned?

Why or why not?
Depends on the situation, of course. People should not be subjected to that sort of air pollution involuntarily. Especially when some people will have serious negative health effects as a result of it.
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
I thought this was a parody thread but.....
It could have been. But I failed.

Incense smoke is a pollutant, and incense, in my experience, is primarily used by those I would consider to be environmentally friendly. But that's not really the point of the thread.

Incense pollution doesn't affect most...especially those who don't use it, or more importantly for the purpose of this thread, don't like it.

But like the thread that inspired the potential of parody, it's a "problem" that doesn't affect most of the people who would be against it. So this thread is more about people whining about things in life that don't really affect them just because they don't like them.
 

Secret Chief

Very strong language
It could have been. But I failed.

Incense smoke is a pollutant, and incense, in my experience, is primarily used by those I would consider to be environmentally friendly. But that's not really the point of the thread.

Incense pollution doesn't affect most...especially those who don't use it, or more importantly for the purpose of this thread, don't like it.

But like the thread that inspired the potential of parody, it's a "problem" that doesn't affect most of the people who would be against it. So this thread is more about people whining about things in life that don't really affect them just because they don't like them.
You mean I bothered to give this some thought for nothing? I'm outraged.
 

Secret Chief

Very strong language
Depends on the situation, of course. People should not be subjected to that sort of air pollution involuntarily. Especially when some people will have serious negative health effects as a result of it.
Quite right too. There's never any burnt when friends with any breathing issues come round and no-one's died yet.
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
Quite right too. There's never any burnt when friends with any breathing issues come round and no-one's died yet.
But there's always that potential. Does that warrant a blanket ban (of incense, not blankets)?
 

syo

Well-Known Member
I know the dangers of it. So, I burn it only in my room with doors shut. I only damage myself.
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
I know the dangers of it. So, I burn it only in my room with doors shut. I only damage myself.
If something has the potential of damaging a person, even it's only the person using it, why shouldn't it be banned?
 

Secret Chief

Very strong language
If something has the potential of damaging a person, even it's only the person using it, why shouldn't it be banned?
Life is full of risks. It's a matter of individually and collectively weighing up those risks and hopefully acting accordingly based upon the risk level and the magnitude of the potential negative cost (eg burning an incense stick in your own home or displaying a small flag with the wrong colours on it in America).
 

Alien826

No religious beliefs
If something has the potential of damaging a person, even it's only the person using it, why shouldn't it be banned?

Because freedom. Following your logic, we could go on to ban smoking, drinking alcohol, overeating, participating in dangerous sports and so on and on.

As a general rule, I'd say that we have the right to hurt (or risk hurting) ourselves, because, well, if we don't own our own bodies, what do we own?
 
Top