Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Mystics always speculate, they have an experience that they interpret, probably differently to anyone else who had the same experience, and then also speculate around those interpretations.Sunstone said:Most mystics make the claim that they are reporting observable experiences. But should mystics ever go beyond observation? Or, should they strictly adhere to what they have observed in reporting their experiences? Is specualation permitted the mystic?
Sunstone said:Most mystics make the claim that they are reporting observable experiences. But should mystics ever go beyond observation? Or, should they strictly adhere to what they have observed in reporting their experiences? Is specualation permitted the mystic?
It would be impossible to be otherwise, no? Perhaps on some level one can experience without interpretation (gnosis). But it seems to me impossible to relate that experience to anyone else without interpretation (and thus speculation).Halcyon said:Mystics always speculate, they have an experience that they interpret, probably differently to anyone else who had the same experience, and then also speculate around those interpretations.
I've never read anything written about or by a mystic that isn't in some way based on interpretation and speculation.