Hey everyone.
I was scrolling through the guardian's articles this morning and found myself wondering whether peoples "reactions" to stories or comments on twitter deserved to be reported in the news.
(Its this article which I'm surprised even got reported as a news item at all:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...arks-anger-with-nazi-style-halloween-costumes )
Maybe I'm behind the times and newspapers are trying to adapt to new social media but it just seems to erode the standards of journalism and misses out "other" stories with more substance for the convience of writing about what goes on within the internet bubble (rather than "why" thats the case).
Should Twitter really make the news or is does this trivalise Reporting with internet gossip? Is this normal for news sources you use?
I was scrolling through the guardian's articles this morning and found myself wondering whether peoples "reactions" to stories or comments on twitter deserved to be reported in the news.
(Its this article which I'm surprised even got reported as a news item at all:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...arks-anger-with-nazi-style-halloween-costumes )
Maybe I'm behind the times and newspapers are trying to adapt to new social media but it just seems to erode the standards of journalism and misses out "other" stories with more substance for the convience of writing about what goes on within the internet bubble (rather than "why" thats the case).
Should Twitter really make the news or is does this trivalise Reporting with internet gossip? Is this normal for news sources you use?