• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Shroud of Turin is from first AD.

Sheldon

Veteran Member
And I was thinking of saying that sponges could have been the earliest of animals. There is no need for "blood" because the water carrying their food flows through them. but that did cause me to read up more on sponges. As I said they are simple animals, but they can and do reproduce sexually. Trigger warning, these perverts are hermaphrodites, but at least most of them have the decency to be only one sex at a time:

Welcome to CK-12 Foundation | CK-12 Foundation

I wonder if there was a deity around to roll its eyes?:tearsofjoy:
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
didn’t come from a theoretical view of evolution from the Big Bang and primordial soup scenario.
Evolution is not theoretical, and it doesn't come from the big bang either, they're not even the same scientific field of study.
face-palm-panda.gif
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
Your scenario is impossible, the theory you are so sure of hasn’t been replicated anywhere in the Universe or on Earth. Again you are saying billions of years as a justification when if you thought about how fragile life is to begin with you can clearly see that life could not possibly happen like you believe.
The only things I’ve seen that multiply like you are suggesting are the things that kill and destroy life like cancer and viruses.

It remains a scientific fact, no matter how much bombast and hubris creationists dedicated to blindly denying it. In fact the more desperately they deny scientific facts, the less credible their beliefs appear. Any belief that needs to deny objective facts, well, it speaks for itself really.
 
It remains a scientific fact, no matter how much bombast and hubris creationists dedicated to blindly denying it. In fact the more desperately they deny scientific facts, the less credible their beliefs appear. Any belief that needs to deny objective facts, well, it speaks for itself really.
Just to let you know, theories are made from facts but theories never become facts.

For example I see that when I throw this apple on the ground it made a dent in the dirt. Fact

Now I can make a theory that cannot be proved and say my theory is based on a fact. That’s what evolutionists and you all do.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Just to let you know, theories are made from facts but theories never become facts.

For example I see that when I throw this apple on the ground it made a dent in the dirt. Fact

Now I can make a theory that cannot be proved and say my theory is based on a fact. That’s what evolutionists and you all do.
Good. Nice to know. Gravity is not a fact.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Gravity is both a fact and a theory. There are many things that are both fact and theory.

But if you don't believe me there are some cliffs that I know of where you could personally test this concept.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ppp
Top