• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Similarities of American immigration to the Japanese Occupation of Korea

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
Has anybody thought of similarities between the 1960's American immigration reform and the Japanese Occupation of Korea? How did Korea begin having any immigration? Because of Japan's forced treaties, first in 1880's and then in the annexation of 1910. In the 1920's and until the end of world war 2 were over 2 million Japanese colonizers, rather than true immigrants. The space they wanted for themselves from east Asian countries, involved installing Japanese judges hearing all disputes.

Typically, the Japanese judge would find in favor in any situation of Japanese people. Japanese could steal at any shop. Japanese managed to take 100% Korean land ownership in korea to near nothing by questioning the deeds or proper documentation. Koreans were rented Korean land to work by the Japanese.

So we see that a pretend 'integration' with a pretend 'economic partnership with capitalist competition' led to an absurd dominance of the Japanese person over the Korean person in Korea.

Churches are the only marker of lands historically. Historically ethnicities are allowed to exist marked by the parishes or lands that are within that ethnicity. The 50's Presbyterian Church no longer makes an ethnic distinction of Americans as they used to, such as the Pilgrims who chose secular forms of government over their religious governance since 1621. The lands of Europe are marked by these Parishes in which you can only describe these as ethnicity based, especially when talking about the "Magyar" Reformed Church, this marks the Ethnic Magyars that travelled the steppes of Russia in the 800's ad to their new ethnic name and home of Hungary, and the Hungarians.

Christian diversity and ethnicity within home countries like Hungary are very successful and extreme. There are Many Other Ethnic Churches IN Hungary and other countries.

The New PCUSA created in 1958 to greed the Korean Americans Korean Presbyterian Church, welcomes membership without ethnic distinction, which is in fact headed toward doctrinal schism with broader Christianity in all they do.

Korean Americans aren't to be distinguished when the PCUSA acts as if they are Expected to join into their own Church society, when this isn't the case of religio-national integrations for any other groups, in any other countries. Korean Americans are forced to not distinguish any religiously identified lands of ethnic Americans by the PCUSA or any moral manners or ethics that Typically occur from every other host country and host population from the much more mundane, and common, interactions of ethnicities through all time in Europe's Christianity.

 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
th3XGM0JJE.jpg
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Has anybody thought of similarities between the 1960's American immigration reform and the Japanese Occupation of Korea? How did Korea begin having any immigration? Because of Japan's forced treaties, first in 1880's and then in the annexation of 1910. In the 1920's and until the end of world war 2 were over 2 million Japanese colonizers, rather than true immigrants. The space they wanted for themselves from east Asian countries, involved installing Japanese judges hearing all disputes.

Typically, the Japanese judge would find in favor in any situation of Japanese people. Japanese could steal at any shop. Japanese managed to take 100% Korean land ownership in korea to near nothing by questioning the deeds or proper documentation. Koreans were rented Korean land to work by the Japanese.

So we see that a pretend 'integration' with a pretend 'economic partnership with capitalist competition' led to an absurd dominance of the Japanese person over the Korean person in Korea.

Churches are the only marker of lands historically. Historically ethnicities are allowed to exist marked by the parishes or lands that are within that ethnicity. The 50's Presbyterian Church no longer makes an ethnic distinction of Americans as they used to, such as the Pilgrims who chose secular forms of government over their religious governance since 1621. The lands of Europe are marked by these Parishes in which you can only describe these as ethnicity based, especially when talking about the "Magyar" Reformed Church, this marks the Ethnic Magyars that travelled the steppes of Russia in the 800's ad to their new ethnic name and home of Hungary, and the Hungarians.

Christian diversity and ethnicity within home countries like Hungary are very successful and extreme. There are Many Other Ethnic Churches IN Hungary and other countries.

The New PCUSA created in 1958 to greed the Korean Americans Korean Presbyterian Church, welcomes membership without ethnic distinction, which is in fact headed toward doctrinal schism with broader Christianity in all they do.

Korean Americans aren't to be distinguished when the PCUSA acts as if they are Expected to join into their own Church society, when this isn't the case of religio-national integrations for any other groups, in any other countries. Korean Americans are forced to not distinguish any religiously identified lands of ethnic Americans by the PCUSA or any moral manners or ethics that Typically occur from every other host country and host population from the much more mundane, and common, interactions of ethnicities through all time in Europe's Christianity.

It is difficult to understand your post. I know that a lot of US citizens have Korean origins, and I am aware that sometimes US citizens also move to Korea. I do not think this is violent, and I think it is a combination of business interests and romantic interests. I do not understand what Presbyterians might have to do with it and why they are mentioned in the post. Presbyterians are a church denomination right?
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
You can't become a Korean citizen. Were you looking to? Plus, that's literally us applying "citizenship" to literally non-citizenship concepts. What about Koreans moving as Citizens to the United States is what I was thinking and wrestling property from us?
European Churches formed in bringing Christianity to the Old World's cultures just like the Korean Presbyterian Church. That's not technically any schism, the US Presbytery deciding to do that immediately. So, you know, if they don't like it they have this radical modern movement of the US Church, its not even there to have adapted to the 1702 Americans they arrived to and Princeton?

Well Everybody needs Christianity to do the work of the American Integrationist! In their minds! That's as simple as it is, for all the 5 threads I did on it.
 
Last edited:
Top