• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Some arguments for vegetarianism

3.14

Well-Known Member
would be awesome though if they had a giant bbq in hell, but i also want a giant plasma tv so i can watch tv while i eat
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
Good point. There's no way to feed anywhere near our present population an omnivorous diet with wild stocks, but, morality aside, the most efficient and least expensive way to feed six billion would be to adopt a primarily vegetarian diet.

Meat is rarely an economically efficient food, as it takes ten or fifteen Kilos of grain, fish meal, &c to produce a kilo of commercial meat.
Better to treat the meat as a luxury item and just consume the grain.

Grains and beans are concentrated, easily transported and need no refrigeration or special preservation, plus, a given population could be fed on much less acrerage if half the grain didn't go to meat production.

I agree with this. Unfortunately, I don't see it happening. Considering the reaction to the Health Care reform, imagine the outcry over food culture reform. :cover: (Although at some point I don't think we'll have a choice unless we are willing to control our reproduction.)

But still, considering the way my spiritual and philosophical upbringing has trained my viewpoint, I actually feel the same way about industrial plant production as meat production, since it still constitutes a mechanical processing of life.
 
Top