It's all been respectful.
No it hasn't. You might
think that it has been - just as you
think I'm somehow enraged by all this - but your many assumptions on our character and lives has been
far less than respectful.
Your complaint is that someone would dare to have the audacity to share such ideas in the first place.
Putting words in my mouth, now? Good thing my statements
here,
here, and
here clearly indicate that I am not against the sharing of ideas. What should be clear - if you've been paying attention, that is - is that door-to-door solicitation is
not a sharing of ideas, it is a dictation of beliefs. Furthermore, my "complaint" is - as has been stated repeatedly - that they are
coming to my door for it all. There is a place for everything, and another's home is
not the place to peddle your beliefs.
And to be clear, for anyone; I'd have the
exact same reaction to a couple of Wiccans dropping by to inform me of The Goddess and her message for me.
Stop spreading false accusations and assumptions and we'll see.
Uh, no. Knocking on your door to attempt a sale, which is explicitly allowed, is not "intrusion".
If it has been made clear the second time that such a pitch is not wanted, and is clearly bothersome and annoying, then it is absolutely an intrusion. Just because they are legally allowed (or not, depending on displayed signs of deterrence), does not mean that I must greet them politely.
Which also covers your misapplication of "intrude", and the claim that I'm using it incorrectly.
In society, we share. We share the environment where there may be the free exchange of ideas.
As stated before, the "environment" of society stops at my door. When those "kindly little kids" come to my door, they're no longer treating with society and it's comforts, they're treating with
me.
Maybe the solution to all this is to teach these upstanding interruptions to social harmony is to train them to truly
learn about other cultures and religions. Don't treat them as a hobby or fancy, or dismiss them outright as false. (Because shocker: you don't have to accept someone's belief to not tell them that they're wrong).
Or maybe, do away with the whole intrusive system, because people have a wealth of information at the tip of their fingers, and if they're really curious about your church they'll stop by. Maybe spruce up the front lawn billboards out in front of the churches, and make their phrases more interesting. See? Those are even on church property, so someone would have to be exceptionally callous and bitter to try and argue against their display.
This is not a forum to create adversarial conflict.
This specifically is a forum to debate - here, to debate the ethical nature of intruding on another's home and life. If adversary relations form, well, such is the nature of debate. But neither is this a forum where people have to take your belief-message laying down.
----------------------------
Move along by shutting the door. How hard is that? Maybe don't answer in the first place.
As stated before, maybe don't go door-to-door in the first place.
That link leads to a record of someone trying to expand proselytizing laws already in effect.
"an ordinance that limited solicitation of contributions door-to-door by charitable organizations to those which use at least 75% of their receipts directly for charitable purposes, defined so as to exclude the expenses of solicitation, salaries, overhead, and other administrative expenses, was invalidated as overbroad."
It also makes note of a court striking down a posed ordinance
in Ohio to impose permits to proselytize. You - door-to-door god-peddlers - are
still required to abstain from soliciting in locations (homes, apartments, businesses, etc) that have "No Soliciting" signs displayed. Furthermore it is the responsibility of the solicitor, not the resident, to observe these signs. Failure to do so is deviation from the law, and opens offenders to punitive action.