• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Star Trek's J.J. Abrams: 'This film's not for Trekkies'

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
J.J. Abrams and cast members from his upcoming Star Trek spoke in Seoul, South Korea, this week to pitch the movie, and Abrams again confirmed that the movie is aimed not so much at longtime fans as at newbies, according to a report on TrekMovie.com. Abrams was joined by Chris Pine, who plays Capt. James T. Kirk, and Zoe Saldana, who plays Uhura.
"We made this film not for Trekkies but for future fans of Star Trek," Abrams told a news conference. "The studio wanted to give the film a fresh start, and I was originally brought in as a producer, but upon reading the script, I saw so much potential and possibility that the original had failed to realize due to technological constraints, so I got very greedy and I decided to direct it myself."


Like Abrams, Pine admitted that he was a relative newbie to the franchise. "I began watching the original series pretty feverishly, because I knew I only had a limited amount of time to prepare for the role, and after getting halfway through the first and second season, I wasn't doing myself any favors by trying to pick up on the mannerisms of William Shatner and the minutiae of the Star Trek world," Pine said. "I would have created a character that was more impersonation than an original incarnation. J.J.'s prescription for realizing the role—and this goes for all of us—was to create our own and not worry too much about obeying the laws of the original Star Trek world."
For her part, Saldana said that she saw herself in the character of Uhura. "I do have a gravitational pull towards characters that are strong," she said. "I think there are similarities between Uhura and myself. It is conceivable to believe that some of you leaks into the roles actors play, and I certainly hope that the things that did manage to leak in, ... complemented my interpretation of my character in the film, the way she's able to command herself with so much discipline and strength in a setting that's mainly masculine and still hold court and fulfill her job in an androgynous manner. I love women that are like that."


Star Trek's J.J. Abrams: 'This film's not for Trekkies' | SCI FI Wire
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I hope it does well, but I have a bad feeling about this.

1. He'll lose Trekkers because he's trying to go mainstream.

2. Mainstream won't be intereseted because it's Star Trek.

Lose-Lose.

Here's to hoping, though!
 

rojse

RF Addict
I hope it does well, but I have a bad feeling about this.

1. He'll lose Trekkers because he's trying to go mainstream.

2. Mainstream won't be intereseted because it's Star Trek.

Lose-Lose.

Here's to hoping, though!

I have a good feeling about this:

1. He'll have trekkers view it because it's got the Star Trek name.

2. He'll have new viewers because it has a high budget and lots of special effects.

Some franchise reboots work quite well by completely disregarding the original movies - look at Batman, for example.

Haven't had the chance to watch any Star Trek yet, but I'll be going to the cinemas for this.
 

painted wolf

Grey Muzzle
I think the Franchise has suffered a great deal by tailoring movies to only the hard-core fan base.

I know I'd rather watch an interesting story with the characters than a cobbled together geek-fest. I never bothered to watch the last two Trek films because they were getting so bad. Or the last couple of shows for that matter.

And I've been watching Trek since I was a child.

wa:do
 

painted wolf

Grey Muzzle
I agree, I saw it right before Watchmen and I was very impressed! It's nice to see action sequences being done by people who look like they can actually do the deeds. :cool:

(one of my biggest peeves was watching increasingly geriatric characters doing things they never managed when half their age.)

wa:do
 

silvermoon383

Well-Known Member
Oh.
My.
Gosh.

I just saw the new trailer myself (had to download it from iTunes), and I only have 2 thoughts:

1. Is it May 8th yet?
2. If not, where can I get a DeLorien?
 

Elessar

Well-Known Member
I'm getting good vibes from this. I am a hard-core Trekker, at heart, but even if this completely changes many things, I can live with it. I just want something that's not crap, like Nemesis or Insurrection or Star Trek: Enterprise.
 

Smoke

Done here.
I'm more of a Stargate guy, but I want to see this. I hope all my Trekker fans like it, because I don't want to hear the moaning if they don't. ;)
 

rojse

RF Addict
Oh.
My.
Gosh.

I just saw the new trailer myself (had to download it from iTunes), and I only have 2 thoughts:

1. Is it May 8th yet?
2. If not, where can I get a DeLorien?

You might only require the assistance of a mad scientist friend whom has taken a batch of plutonium from Libyans.
 

Justcurious

New Member
I am really excited about the movie and look forward to the new cast, the new look. A friend of mine is nervous of the new cast thinking it might not be right, that nobody can replace the orginal cast. I think that the characters of Kirk and Spock are like some of my favorite literary charachters like Sherlock Holmes. For each new generation, new actors can bring something new to the charactors. I will agree with my friend that I hope that they keep some of the humor and the light hearted bantor between the three main Krik, Spock, and McCoy. It does not have to be all explosions, and excitement, there should be some human moments as well.

What does everybody think about some of the casting?
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
“So before Trek fans get too worked up over Abrams comments about the new Trek film being for new fans, bear in mind that Star Trek has not performed well in non-English speaking markets (with the exception of Germany). For the film to succeed in Asia, it needs an audience comprised almost entirely of ‘new fans’ so it makes sense for Abrams and Paramount to market the film being for that audience.”
Um, since when did we start making movies designed to do well in non-English markets?

Personally speaking, I don't see why we need yet another Star Trek. Is it me or hasn't this been done to death already? I see this as just another sign that Hollywood has last its grip on creativity and originality. Then again, they are coming off a string of movies inspired by comic book heroes, so I guess I shouldn't be expecting too much from them.
 
Top