State Department Coverup?

[esmith]

Well at least you opened the post, I doubt the majority of you would if I had made the title "Benghazi 5 years Latter". Those that are interested in the story you can skip to the next paragraph. But if you want you can read my opinion on what I expect can continue reading . So those of you who are closed minded and don't care to read about new information about Benghazi being brought forward, you may now slink away and go back to your bubble. Yes I know my major source is dismissed by the majority of this forum, but I respect the reporting of Catherine Herridge and her many years of experience covering intelligence matters. So, is this another anit-Hillary subject? No, not exactly, other than she was Sec Of State prior to, during, and after the fact along with the Obama as her boss. So what is the new information that is being brought forward? Well read the article, and no I'm not saying it is the whole truth and nothing but the truth, nor am saying that it is just two persons that have an ax to grind with the State Dept, probably some of both;but I respect the integrative of Catherine Herridge and her ability to determine what a story is. I'll let you make that decision and put forth your own opinion on the story. Of course I expect numerous comments that have little or nothing to do with the story. That's just par for the course here.


So Here Is The Article with additional links embedded.
Clinton State Department silenced them on Benghazi security lapses, contractors say

 

[Mohsen]

keep going, I'm reading as and when you post!

peace

 

[Kemosloby]

Benghazi coverup is minute compared to the 9/11 cover up. 9/11 is so big they can't even talk about it on TV.

 

[Mohsen]

Benghazi coverup is minute compared to the 9/11 cover up. 9/11 is so big they can't even talk about it on TV.

Well, the European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition!

15 YEARS LATER: ON THE PHYSICS OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING COLLAPSES

15-years after the attacks on September 11th, the European Scientific Journal, a publication of the European Scientific Institute (ESI), published an article titled “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses,” in which they analyze the collapse of all three World Trade Center buildings. The results of their findings continue to indicate that the WTC towers were destroyed by controlled demolition, and the fact that this controversial topic was covered by a publication that boasts an editorial committee from reputable colleges and universities around the world (despite the article’s disclaimer), can be considered yet another small victory for 9/11 Truthers.

The study was written in collaboration by Steven Jones of Brigham Young University (now retired), Robert Korol of McMaster University – a Mechanical Design Engineer in the aerospace industry, Anthony Szamboti, and Ted Walter of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The highly-sourced study breaks down the scientific evidence while revealing the discrepancies in NIST’s official report...

https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016-47-4.pdf skip to page 23 (six pages of interesting information bludgeoning the nonsense we were supposed to believe for the last 15 years)

Peace

 

[Stanyon]

Well, the European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition!

15 YEARS LATER: ON THE PHYSICS OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING COLLAPSES

15-years after the attacks on September 11th, the European Scientific Journal, a publication of the European Scientific Institute (ESI), published an article titled “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses,” in which they analyze the collapse of all three World Trade Center buildings. The results of their findings continue to indicate that the WTC towers were destroyed by controlled demolition, and the fact that this controversial topic was covered by a publication that boasts an editorial committee from reputable colleges and universities around the world (despite the article’s disclaimer), can be considered yet another small victory for 9/11 Truthers.

The study was written in collaboration by Steven Jones of Brigham Young University (now retired), Robert Korol of McMaster University – a Mechanical Design Engineer in the aerospace industry, Anthony Szamboti, and Ted Walter of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The highly-sourced study breaks down the scientific evidence while revealing the discrepancies in NIST’s official report...

https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016-47-4.pdf skip to page 23 (six pages of interesting information bludgeoning the nonsense we were supposed to believe for the last 15 years)

Peace

So it didn't have anything to do with Muslims crashing large planes into them?- glad we got that cleared up

 

[YmirGF]

Well, the European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition!

15 YEARS LATER: ON THE PHYSICS OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING COLLAPSES

15-years after the attacks on September 11th, the European Scientific Journal, a publication of the European Scientific Institute (ESI), published an article titled “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses,” in which they analyze the collapse of all three World Trade Center buildings. The results of their findings continue to indicate that the WTC towers were destroyed by controlled demolition, and the fact that this controversial topic was covered by a publication that boasts an editorial committee from reputable colleges and universities around the world (despite the article’s disclaimer), can be considered yet another small victory for 9/11 Truthers.

The study was written in collaboration by Steven Jones of Brigham Young University (now retired), Robert Korol of McMaster University – a Mechanical Design Engineer in the aerospace industry, Anthony Szamboti, and Ted Walter of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The highly-sourced study breaks down the scientific evidence while revealing the discrepancies in NIST’s official report...

https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016-47-4.pdf skip to page 23 (six pages of interesting information bludgeoning the nonsense we were supposed to believe for the last 15 years)

Peace

FALSE: European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 Was a Controlled Demolition

 

[It Aint Necessarily So]

Well at least you opened the post, I doubt the majority of you would if I had made the title "Benghazi 5 years Latter". Those that are interested in the story you can skip to the next paragraph. But if you want you can read my opinion on what I expect can continue reading . So those of you who are closed minded and don't care to read about new information about Benghazi being brought forward, you may now slink away and go back to your bubble. Yes I know my major source is dismissed by the majority of this forum, but I respect the reporting of Catherine Herridge and her many years of experience covering intelligence matters. So, is this another anit-Hillary subject? No, not exactly, other than she was Sec Of State prior to, during, and after the fact along with the Obama as her boss. So what is the new information that is being brought forward? Well read the article, and no I'm not saying it is the whole truth and nothing but the truth, nor am saying that it is just two persons that have an ax to grind with the State Dept, probably some of both;but I respect the integrative of Catherine Herridge and her ability to determine what a story is. I'll let you make that decision and put forth your own opinion on the story. Of course I expect numerous comments that have little or nothing to do with the story. That's just par for the course here.


So Here Is The Article with additional links embedded.
Clinton State Department silenced them on Benghazi security lapses, contractors say

Do you have any news on the Warren G. Harding or Fatty Arbuckle scandals?

 

[sun rise]

I see the right is still publicly obsessing about Hillary Clinton rather than focusing on the terrible lies, ethical issues etc with the current regime in power. Yeah she did things wrong but compared to the current group, what she did was the merest piffle to the criminal behavior going on now.

 

[Revoltingest]

FALSE: European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 Was a Controlled Demolition

I wonder if these Eurostanian 'researchers' addressed the problem of all the explosives, connecting
wires, access openings, controllers, etc were hidden from the landlord & many tenants?
Not one of them noticed the extensive preparations required for controlled demolition, eh?

 

[BSM1]

I wonder if these Eurostanian 'researchers' addressed the problem of all the explosives, connecting
wires, access openings, controllers, etc were hidden from the landlord & many tenants?
Not one of them noticed the extensive preparations required for controlled demolition, eh?

It seems sometimes the obvious isn't.

 

[esmith]

Well, just as I predicted
There are those that have to change the subject when the subject goes somewhere that they are afraid of addressing or dismiss it for the same reason.
Knew we couldn't have a open discussion.

 

[metis]

(((yawn)))

 

[leibowde84]

Benghazi coverup is minute compared to the 9/11 cover up. 9/11 is so big they can't even talk about it on TV.

LOL

 

[leibowde84]

Well, the European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition!

15 YEARS LATER: ON THE PHYSICS OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING COLLAPSES

15-years after the attacks on September 11th, the European Scientific Journal, a publication of the European Scientific Institute (ESI), published an article titled “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses,” in which they analyze the collapse of all three World Trade Center buildings. The results of their findings continue to indicate that the WTC towers were destroyed by controlled demolition, and the fact that this controversial topic was covered by a publication that boasts an editorial committee from reputable colleges and universities around the world (despite the article’s disclaimer), can be considered yet another small victory for 9/11 Truthers.

The study was written in collaboration by Steven Jones of Brigham Young University (now retired), Robert Korol of McMaster University – a Mechanical Design Engineer in the aerospace industry, Anthony Szamboti, and Ted Walter of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The highly-sourced study breaks down the scientific evidence while revealing the discrepancies in NIST’s official report...

https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016-47-4.pdf skip to page 23 (six pages of interesting information bludgeoning the nonsense we were supposed to believe for the last 15 years)

Peace

It says very clearly in the disclaimer that the conclusion is that of the author NOT of the European Scientific Journal or Committee or Board or whatever.

 

[DavidFirth]

Clinton's hands are so dirty that she can never wash the filth from them. Why did she delete all those emails off a secure government server? Hopefully one day we'll know for sure.

 

[Mohsen]

It says very clearly in the disclaimer that the conclusion is that of the author NOT of the European Scientific Journal or Committee or Board or whatever.

you remind me of this:

 

[leibowde84]

Clinton's hands are so dirty that she can never wash the filth from them. Why did she delete all those emails off a secure government server? Hopefully one day we'll know for sure.

Well, the FBI investigated and found no criminal wrongdoing. What more do you want?

It's funny though. I assume you think that the Russia investigation is a witch hunt, yet it is based on the same speculation you are using here. Is it OK to speculate about Clinton's motives, but not alright to speculate about Trump's?

 

[leibowde84]

you remind me of this:

That looks more like you, as you are the one who made a claim that your own source clearly states is false.

 

[DavidFirth]

Well, the FBI investigated and found no criminal wrongdoing. What more do you want?

It's funny though. I assume you think that the Russia investigation is a witch hunt, yet it is based on the same speculation you are using here. Is it OK to speculate about Clinton's motives, but not alright to speculate about Trump's?

How many emails did Trump delete from a secure government server? How many people have testified to Clinton's wrong doing and failure to prepare?

Obama controlled the FBI. No wonder they kept their mouths shut.

 

[metis]

I see the right is still publicly obsessing about Hillary Clinton rather than focusing on the terrible lies, ethical issues etc with the current regime in power.

Of course, since the "Do Nothing Party" now is in control to continue on with their do-nothing "accomplishments".

If my memory is correct, there's been 11 different Benghazi investigations with not one of them producing a smoking gun against Hillary, and the last one that was orchestrated by the Pubs in Congress made them look like complete idiots.

Also, a reminder that it was largely the Pubs that orchestrated significant financial cuts to the security of our embassies even though they were warned that it could leave them more vulnerable.