Howard Is
Lucky Mud
The fact remains.
There are no O.T. or N.T.
original autographs
Yeah...and ?
You are going in a tight circle.
We’re on page three, and you are still conducting a teaser campaign.
What is your solution to this dilemma?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The fact remains.
There are no O.T. or N.T.
original autographs
So say you.
But then, your career depends on it.
I can't take you seriously.
You're insincere and ridiculous.
Reality is perfectly obvious.
I falsehood, I aver.No, doctor, the curriculum
has a registered copright.
What career is this?So say you.
But then, your career depends on it.
Yeah...and ?
You are going in a tight circle.
We’re on page three, and you are still conducting a teaser campaign.
What is your solution to this dilemma?
It's just ego running amok, from what I can see.
You've an amateur gangsta
three days a week, remember.
It's perfectly obvious that
you've not a Bible scholar.
I falsehood, I aver.
But, if thou liest not,
thou should'st be able to yield us up
a link to the entry on the US Copyright Office website [bathos]
which is here: U.S. Copyright Office
I hold not my breath.
The catalogue has a copyright, of course.I could send a photocopy
of the copyright registration.
Every college catalog has a copyright
which includes the curriculum
and course descriptions.
The "original only" people
are embarrassed.
Everyone knows that there
are no original autographs.
Even an amature gangsta philosopher
can understand that there are no
original autographs.
The catalogue has a copyright, of course.
But not the content of the curriculum.
You claimed to hold the registered copyright in the curriculum.
This is horsesh*t.
The most you can claim is copyright in a printed catalog or brochure
if you yourself created it.
This is true - especially the latter part of your statement.Universities also need to show young people what a self-important idiot look like, as they will encounter many of them in their professional lives.
The printed words on the page are the copyrightOh, ok doctor, I thought the copyright
on the catalog included the contents.
....round and round we go.....
BTW, even an amateur gangsta can spell better than an academic
Everyone knows that there
are no original autographs.
The printed words on the page are the copyright
of the institution or individual who created the document.
But not the ideas described or listed therein.
So did you create the catalog?
If you did not, the copyright belongs to someone
other than you.