• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Statistical Reasoning

James2028

Member
Yeah...and ?

You are going in a tight circle.
We’re on page three, and you are still conducting a teaser campaign.
What is your solution to this dilemma?

You've an amateur gangsta
three days a week, remember.
It's perfectly obvious that
you've not a Bible scholar.
 

James2028

Member
I falsehood, I aver.

But, if thou liest not,
thou should'st be able to yield us up
a link to the entry on the US Copyright Office website [bathos]
which is here: U.S. Copyright Office

I hold not my breath.

I could send a photocopy
of the copyright registration.

Every college catalog has a copyright
which includes the curriculum
and course descriptions.
 

PureX

Veteran Member
Universities also need to show young people what a self-important idiot looks like, as they will encounter many of them in their professional lives.
 
Last edited:

James2028

Member
The "original only" people
are embarrassed.

Everyone knows that there
are no original autographs.

Even an amature gangsta philosopher
can understand that there are no
original autographs.
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
I could send a photocopy
of the copyright registration.

Every college catalog has a copyright
which includes the curriculum
and course descriptions.
The catalogue has a copyright, of course.
But not the content of the curriculum.

You claimed to hold the registered copyright in the curriculum.
This is horsesh*t.
The most you can claim is copyright in a printed catalog or brochure.
If you yourself created it.

You may be a theological Theorist
but you know jack about intellectual property. :D
 

James2028

Member
The catalogue has a copyright, of course.
But not the content of the curriculum.

You claimed to hold the registered copyright in the curriculum.
This is horsesh*t.
The most you can claim is copyright in a printed catalog or brochure
if you yourself created it.

Oh, ok doctor, I thought the copyright
on the catalog included the contents.
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
Universities also need to show young people what a self-important idiot look like, as they will encounter many of them in their professional lives.
This is true - especially the latter part of your statement.

At university, my experience was that the self-important idiots were mostly the undergraduates rather than the dons, thankfully. I don't think a don would generally be an idiot and, if he were self-important, a university is chock-full of people ready to pop his balloon of pomposity. :D

I think I may know this poster. If he is who I think, he is British and delusional.
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
Oh, ok doctor, I thought the copyright
on the catalog included the contents.
The printed words on the page are the copyright
of the institution or individual who created the document.

But not the ideas described or listed therein.

So did you create the catalog?
If you did not, the copyright belongs to someone
other than you.
 

Howard Is

Lucky Mud
Everyone knows that there
are no original autographs.

...and around again...

You haven’t added a single idea to that pearl of wisdom.
I doubt that you will.
The thing about gangstas is, we can spot dodgy punters very quickly.
You are a dodgy punter.
Three pages of teaser campaign and egomania.
I may join the discussion again if you actually say something substantive.
 

James2028

Member
The printed words on the page are the copyright
of the institution or individual who created the document.

But not the ideas described or listed therein.

So did you create the catalog?
If you did not, the copyright belongs to someone
other than you.

I know.
 
Top