-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Statistical Reasoning
- Thread starter James2028
- Start date
Howard Is
Lucky Mud
Your respect would be an indictment and an insult.
James2028
Member
The " Original Only Theory "
produces a sola scriptura theology
with 99.1% probability.
The " KJV Only Theory " produces
a sola scriptura theology with
99.99% probability.
The Purifed Text Theory is the truest
Sola Scriptura Theology.
It produces a sola scriptura theology
with 100% certainty.
produces a sola scriptura theology
with 99.1% probability.
The " KJV Only Theory " produces
a sola scriptura theology with
99.99% probability.
The Purifed Text Theory is the truest
Sola Scriptura Theology.
It produces a sola scriptura theology
with 100% certainty.
Last edited:
5 pages in and no substance. The verbal diarrhea and shameless flexing at least make it an entertaining read, though.
James2028
Member
Final authority is the central critical
issue in academic theology.
Be honest.
You have no idea what the
purified text theory is.
Not one single individual in this thread
knows what the purified text theory is
and are to insincere to admit that
they have been parroting the
original only theory.
Last edited:
Well of course I have no idea what the purified text theory is. I have no idea what anything you have brought up is. There's no sources, no context, and you've presented it in such a way that is inaccessible for people who aren't versed in the exact same theological theories on biblical texts that you are. Maybe it's intentional, so you can weed out uneducated plebs such as myself who wouldn't have much to contribute in your eyes, but from my perspective it looks as though you are just someone trying to troll people. in any case, enjoy yourself. I'll just sit back and eat my popcorn.
Howard Is
Lucky Mud
James2028
Member
SigurdReginson, I do like your attitude
and I hope you will research these theories.
Since you have read this thread you now
have a comprehensive orientation.
John 7:38 He that believeth on me,
as the scripture hath said, out of his belly
shall flow rivers of living water.
.
and I hope you will research these theories.
Since you have read this thread you now
have a comprehensive orientation.
John 7:38 He that believeth on me,
as the scripture hath said, out of his belly
shall flow rivers of living water.
.
Last edited:
And here I was, hoping to see a discussion of the validity of statistical reasoning, or something interesting.
Instead, I see some claims comparing different theologies with no basis for the comparison, and obvious statements that none of the Biblical texts we have are originals.
Ultimately, theology is simply re-arranging your prejudices. It isn't a valid area of study (except historically) and is completely ** (the degree claimed, I see).
So, why should anyone care about whether there are or are not 'original autographs'? The whole subject is, as far as I can see, garbage.
Instead, I see some claims comparing different theologies with no basis for the comparison, and obvious statements that none of the Biblical texts we have are originals.
Ultimately, theology is simply re-arranging your prejudices. It isn't a valid area of study (except historically) and is completely ** (the degree claimed, I see).
So, why should anyone care about whether there are or are not 'original autographs'? The whole subject is, as far as I can see, garbage.
James2028
Member
We should care because the scriptures
are the final authority.
Jesus Christ repeatedly stated that
there is a heaven and there is a hell.
John 3:3 Jesus answered and said
unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee,
Except a man be born again he can not
see the Kingdom of God.
I disagree. The scriptures were written by men for political and social power. They should be ignored as useless, in my opinion.
I really don't care, except as a historical curiosity, which texts were originally used and which were not. It can be interesting to see how the texts changed over time, if you are into that sort of thing.
But theology? Pure garbage. A topic without a subject.
James2028
Member
Jesus fulfilled 300 messianic prophecies,
was born of a virgin, performed miracles,
lived a sinless life, died, was buried in
a sealed tomb, rose from the dead,
showed himself alive to 500 individuals
at once who knew him or knew of him
and then spent forty days with
his family and his disciples.
His followers have build thousands
of churches and colleges.
There are thousands of dissertations
demonstrating the apologetics of scripture
and the divinity of Jesus Christ.
Your opinion is irrelevant.
Maybe you should contact Oxford,
Cambridge, Harvard, Yale and Princeton
and let them know that you have disproved
all the dissertations.
Maybe you're wiser than Solomon
and have more authority
than Jesus Christ.
was born of a virgin, performed miracles,
lived a sinless life, died, was buried in
a sealed tomb, rose from the dead,
showed himself alive to 500 individuals
at once who knew him or knew of him
and then spent forty days with
his family and his disciples.
His followers have build thousands
of churches and colleges.
There are thousands of dissertations
demonstrating the apologetics of scripture
and the divinity of Jesus Christ.
Your opinion is irrelevant.
Maybe you should contact Oxford,
Cambridge, Harvard, Yale and Princeton
and let them know that you have disproved
all the dissertations.
Maybe you're wiser than Solomon
and have more authority
than Jesus Christ.
Last edited:
Howard Is
Lucky Mud
There are millions if not billions of worthless statements out there.
There are thousands of dissertations that are garbage. I know, I have been on dissertation committees.