• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Statistical Reasoning

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
The "Original Only" theorists
become embarrassed and unresponsive.

The "KJV Only" theorists
become jealous and closed minded.

Atheists are reprobate and dishonest.

Agnostics are slow of heart to believe.

Catholics are superstitious and give
precedence to Codex Vaticanus.

Unitarians can't find true wider hope.

The infinite universe theoretical physicists
believe man will continue to expand
throughout the entire universe
and evolve towards everlasting life
or at least a conscious particle of reality.


All I said was the Purified Text Theory
produces the truest Sola Scriptura Theology with 100% probability, mathematically.

The twenty five years postdoctoral
Ed.D. research was exhaustive.
The results are conclusive
and categorical in the
manuscript evidence, bible canonization,
bible doctrine, church history,
the development of higher education,
the organization of nations,
billions of bible and
computational linguistics.

What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
The " Original Only Theory "
with the right line of manuscripts
produces an equation
with 99.1% probability.

The " KJV Only Theory " produces
an equation with 99.99% probability
in statistical reasoning.

The Purifed Text Theory is the truest
Sola Scriptura Theology.
It produces a scientific statement
with 100% probability.

The Record Theory answers
the questions of final canonization
and final authority.

.

What questions? Probability of what?
 

James2028

Member
Sorry I can't text you the evidence.
I know you have learned new
research because I wrote it.

- five copyright curriculums including
the bachelor of science in academic theology

- 25 yrs postdoctoral dissertation

- 110 GB research and deveploment
administration of higher education

.
 
Last edited:

A Vestigial Mote

Well-Known Member
Sorry I can't text you the evidence.
I know you have learned new
research because I wrote it.

- five copyright curriculums including
the bachelor of science in academic theology

- 25 yrs postdoctoral dissertation

- 110 GB research and deveploment
administration of higher education
No one should care about your posturing with these "qualifications." No one. You so obviously don't have the goods to back it up. And if you do then guess what? You should be able to produce compelling results. The foundations of your findings should be accessible in some way. If you don't have this, then it doesn't matter how many times you insist you have come to the end results in a valid way - no one should accept what you are saying. No one.
 

James2028

Member
lol, reading this thread does

make me smile, are you serious,

reread my last 2 posts

.
 
Last edited:

James2028

Member
No one should care about your posturing with these "qualifications." No one. You so obviously don't have the goods to back it up. And if you do then guess what? You should be able to produce compelling results. The foundations of your findings should be accessible in some way. If you don't have this, then it doesn't matter how many times you insist you have come to the end results in a valid way - no one should accept what you are saying. No one.


lol, I'm sorry, I can't take you seriously

.
 

A Vestigial Mote

Well-Known Member
lol, I'm sorry, I can't take you seriously

.
Nor I (and a great many others apparently - as in SUPER apparently) you.

You couldn't even answer the single, simple question I (and others) posed to you about WHERE you got your percentage figures for the probabilities of "correctness" you keep using. Just think about that. You dodged that question every time and just kept on asserting things. You can't even answer a single, simple question, can you? Can you? No. No you can't. Because you would have to answer that they came straight out of your butt, wouldn't you? Well?
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
Sorry I can't text you the evidence.
I know you have learned new
research because I wrote it.

- five copyright curriculums including
the bachelor of science in academic theology

- 25 yrs postdoctoral dissertation

- 110 GB research and deveploment
administration of higher education

.

Could you direct me to a file or website? Put it up on Google Docs?
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
Sorry I can't text you the evidence.
I know you have learned new
research because I wrote it.

- five copyright curriculums including
the bachelor of science in academic theology

- 25 yrs postdoctoral dissertation

- 110 GB research and deveploment
administration of higher education

.

Name of documents.Who published your dissertation?

What is the title of you dissertation? Where can we read it?

What universities did you get your degrees from?
 

James2028

Member
Please don't simply copy me.
There is no value in that
and I will lose interest in you.

Bachelor of Science Degree
Master of Christian Education Degree
Doctor of Education Degree
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
Please don't simply copy me.
There is no value in that
and I will lose interest in you.

Bachelor of Science Degree
Master of Christian Education Degree
Doctor of Education Degree

You haven't answered the questions I posted to you:

Name of documents.Who published your dissertation?

What is the title of you dissertation? Where can we read it?

What universities did you get your degrees from?​
 

James2028

Member
.

I was a doctoral candidate taking
eigth year theology courses
at a catholic seminary.

Both franciscan and jesuit monks
with Ph.D.'s were very interested in
final canonization and final authority.
The statements you're reading are
25 yrs. postdoctoral.

Dr. Hills - harvard - manuscript evidence

Dr. Phelps - yale - purified text theory

Dr. Ruckman - manuscript evidence

Dr. Riplinger - computational linguistics






.
 
Last edited:

James2028

Member
.

I'd really like not to get kicked
out of this form. It's the only one I'm in
and my thread is truly valuable to me.

Sincerely, what I post I wrote.
What I write I publish and lecture.
It is not spam to me.
It's my gift and calling.
I listen and speak directly to every
reader and listener everytime.

KJV Every good gift
and every perfect gift
cometh down from above,
from the Father of lights.


.
 
Last edited:

James2028

Member
Guess what. I'm not a real monk.

What university did you attend, FOR THE THIRD TIME.

lol, I didn't think so, I didn't see any
wondering monks at the seminary
I attended.

Are there any degree requirements
to become an imaginary
wandering monk' ?


.
 
Last edited:

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
lol, I didn't see any wondering monks
at the seminary I attended. They seem
to be very demanding.

Are there any degree requirements
to become an imaginary
wandering monk' ?


.

Fun to watch you tap dance. You can't/won't provide evidence for the credentials you assert you have.
 
Top