Sunstone's Airtight, Logical Argument for the Existence of the Gods

[Sunstone]

Sunstone's airtight, logical argument for the existence of the gods:

1) That which is true cannot be rationally refuted.

2) All metaphysical speculation is insufferably boring (Just try it at a beach party, if you don't believe me!)

3) We may speculate the gods were born 12 nanoseconds into the Big Bang.

4) It would be insufferably boring to dispute that.

5) No rational person willingly seeks to suffer.

6) So no rational person will seek to refute that the gods were born 12 nanoseconds into the Big Bang because that would amount to willingly seeking to suffer.

7) Hence, it cannot be rationally refuted that the gods were born 12 nanoseconds into the Big Bang.

8) But what cannot be rationally refuted is true.

QED: The gods were born 12 nanoseconds into the Big Bang.​

Bite the dust, Atheists!

 

[Terese]

Refutation: Sunstone is wearing two different pairs of socks! Tsk tsk. Apparently your incredible knowledge of the Gods took a toll on your fashion sense

 

[Sunstone]

Refutation: Sunstone is wearing two different pairs of socks! Tsk tsk. Apparently your incredible knowledge of the Gods took a toll on your fashion sense

Granted, but @SalixIncendium knows far more about the gods than I do -- just get an eyeful of his "go to meeting" outfit for July!

 

[Sunstone]

@joe1776, I cracked up to see you rated my joke thread as informative. Thanks for that!

 

[Dawnofhope]

It’s logic that’s as good as any when you’ve had a hard night out and can barely walk a straight line.

 

[Dawnofhope]

@joe1776, I cracked up to see you rated my joke thread as informative. Thanks for that!

He must have been as out of his mind as you were when you wrote the OP lol

 

[joe1776]

@joe1776, I cracked up to see you rated my joke thread as informative. Thanks for that!

What? You weren't serious?

 

[PureX]

1. Ideas exist.

2. "God" is an idea.

3."God" exists (as an idea).

Q. Does "God" exist, physically?
A. No one is proposing that "God" exists, physically. The proposition is that "God " exists, actually.
Q. How do we prove that "God" actually exists?
A. We can't. Nor can we prove that "God" does not actually exist. Thus, we can only choose to presume that "God" does or does not actually exist, as a act of faith, and then present the results of that act as our "evidence".

 

[Sunstone]

1. Ideas exist.

2. "God" is an idea.

3."God" exists (as an idea).

Q. Does "God" exist, physically?
A. No one is proposing that "God" exists, physically. The proposition is that "God " exists, actually.
Q. How do we prove that "God" actually exists?
A. We can't. Nor can we prove that "God" does not actually exist. Thus, we can only choose to presume that "God" does or does not actually exist, as a act of faith, and then present the results of that act as our "evidence".

Hilarious!

 

[Rival]

5) No rational person willingly seeks to suffer.

I'm sorry?!

 

[Rival]

@Sunstone the shopkeeper's response after the question at 3:50

 

[ChristineM]

Sunstone's airtight, logical argument for the existence of the gods:

1) That which is true cannot be rationally refuted.

2) All metaphysical speculation is insufferably boring (Just try it at a beach party, if you don't believe me!)

3) We may speculate the gods were born 12 nanoseconds into the Big Bang.

4) It would be insufferably boring to dispute that.

5) No rational person willingly seeks to suffer.

6) So no rational person will seek to refute that the gods were born 12 nanoseconds into the Big Bang because that would amount to willingly seeking to suffer.

7) Hence, it cannot be rationally refuted that the gods were born 12 nanoseconds into the Big Bang.

8) But what cannot be rationally refuted is true.

QED: The gods were born 12 nanoseconds into the Big Bang.​

Bite the dust, Atheists!

Now all you need to do is prove gods to be true and your #1 wont trip you up.

12 nanoseconds is an insufferably long time in the picosecond epochs of the early universe.

But according to the OT the abrahamic god is adept at making people suffer.

 

[David T]

Sunstone's airtight, logical argument for the existence of the gods:

1) That which is true cannot be rationally refuted.

2) All metaphysical speculation is insufferably boring (Just try it at a beach party, if you don't believe me!)

3) We may speculate the gods were born 12 nanoseconds into the Big Bang.

4) It would be insufferably boring to dispute that.

5) No rational person willingly seeks to suffer.

6) So no rational person will seek to refute that the gods were born 12 nanoseconds into the Big Bang because that would amount to willingly seeking to suffer.

7) Hence, it cannot be rationally refuted that the gods were born 12 nanoseconds into the Big Bang.

8) But what cannot be rationally refuted is true.

QED: The gods were born 12 nanoseconds into the Big Bang.​

Bite the dust, Atheists!

OK that's a winner. Rational is on spectrum with it mostly being rationalizing rather than actually rational which is take a deep breath have a beer life is short and we are stupid.

The most rational explanation of rational video I know "people are crazy", music awesomeness.

 

[sun rise]

1. Either God exists or does not exist.
2. Asserting both are true or both are false is boring.
3. God created everything as a joke or not.
4. God created people in His image or not.
5. If we're not living in a big joke, life is unbearably sad.
6. If we were not created in God's image, we're ugly since God is beauty by definition.
7. @Sunstone exists by definition.
8. @Sunstone amuses us which is obviously true.
9. Therefore life is a joke because we can laugh.
10. There are very beautiful people in the world.
11. Therefore people are not ugly.
12. Therefore God created us.
13. Therefore God exists and we're living in an almighty joke.
14. The joke's on us.

 

[Brickjectivity]

Sunstone's airtight, logical argument for the existence of the gods:

Sunstone's existence proves that Science is True, which is Scientifically impossible as Science does not ascertain ultimate truths. Therefore he cannot exist. Hence he must constantly assert his Philosophy in order to remain in our plain of existence.