Most did not say that,. In fact very few did. That is ironic, since the Dems oppose everything Trump does and now they are even saying he needs to be impeached. The LW folks are like petulant children. They all need to get a puppy to pet and quit eating sour grapes
What are you even talking about? It was party policy.
http://washingtonmonthly.com/2015/02/01/a-walk-down-memory-lane-on-republican-obstruction/
Former Republican Congressional staffer
Mike Lofgren explains the strategy.
"A couple of years ago, a Republican committee staff director told me candidly (and proudly) what the method was to all this obstruction and disruption. Should Republicans succeed in obstructing the Senate from doing its job, it would further lower Congress’s generic favorability rating among the American people. By sabotaging the reputation of an institution of government, the party that is programmatically against government would come out the relative winner."
...former speech-writer for President George W. Bush –
David Frum – is ejected from the party for writing this:
"At the beginning of this process we made a strategic decision: unlike, say, Democrats in 2001 when President Bush proposed his first tax cut, we would make no deal with the administration. No negotiations, no compromise, nothing. We were going for all the marbles. This would be Obama’s Waterloo – just as healthcare was Clinton’s in 1994…"
This is not in my head.
And now the Dems are doing the same thing. You need to be fair and balanced...
In response to their treatment of Obama, of course they are. But as David Frum points out, Democrats weren't like this for George Bush. They compromised with Bush on tax cuts in 2001 (and later with him on the medicare drug plan).
It's called consequences. It's why traditionally politicians didn't go to those extremes. In the long run it tends to haunt them.