• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Suppression of Free Speech on Covid

McBell

Unbound
The only one who redacted/edited anything was Steve Kirsch, and his purpose for doing that was to protect the anonymity of the people involved in the pay-per-jab program that Barry Young was the data administrator of. He said that the statistical integrity of the data was preserved. If you think that a government with a religious axe to grind is more credible that an entrepreneur/philanthopist then that's on you.
I would much prefer that the full terabyte that was stolen from the servers be made available instead of a measly 1.2 gigabytes of the one terabyte.

Like I said, I am sus when less than one tenth of the stolen data is made available and only then by jumping through hoops.
 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
Sir, where does this say common law is "theistic?"
It doesn't. It's well known that common law is theistic from the references to "God" in the maxims of the common law. Also, English common law goes back to King Alfred the Great, who included a Saxon version of the ten commandments of Exodus 20 in his description of the law.

And what does that have do with the price of eggs, for the third time?
Because of the union of the church and state of the Westminster system. The head of state swore an oath to preserve the settlement of the church in relation to the law of England. An oath is act of religion, so the relevance of theology is unavoidable.

As with the danger of vaccination, you do not know what you're talking about in this thread.
I'm not the one who was wrong about the common law or is ignoring the statistical analysis of the death/dose data.
 

McBell

Unbound
Oh, so this is data they pulled from NZ Health and then edited themselves? LOL ah okay now I see.
Yes.
There was just over one terabyte of data stolen.
The thief is only offering up 1.2gigbytes of that data.
So it had to be edited.
The claim is that Steve Kirsch, who does not know a damn thing about immunizations let alone what raw data is and is not relevant, edited the data.
 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
I would much prefer that the full terabyte that was stolen from the servers be made available instead of a measly 1.2 gigabytes of the one terabyte.
Nothing was stolen. Theft involves depriving the rightful owner of possession.
Also, I don't know where you got the idea from that there was a terabyte of data.
 

Left Coast

This Is Water
Staff member
Premium Member
It doesn't. It's well known that common law is theistic from the references to "God" in the maxims of the common law. Also, English common law goes back to King Alfred the Great, who included a Saxon version of the ten commandments of Exodus 20 in his description of the law.

This is going to shock you, but law has evolved since the 9th century. So yes, law was surely more theocratic back in the middle ages but broadly speaking it isn't any longer. We still base part of modern law in Western countries on common law but things have changed. The modern government of New Zealand is secular.

Because of the union of the church and state of the Westminster system. The head of state swore an oath to preserve the settlement of the church in relation to the law of England. An oath is act of religion, so the relevance of theology is unavoidable.

The heads of of State and Government are different, sir. Because it's a secular system. That's why they have a Prime Minister.

Nor have you explained how any of that is relevant to vaccine information anyway.

I'm not the one who was wrong about the common law or is ignoring the statistical analysis of the death/dose data.

Actually you are wrong on both counts, lol. The irony.
 

McBell

Unbound
Nothing was stolen. Theft involves depriving the rightful owner of possession.
Also, I don't know where you got the idea from that there was a terabyte of data.
Barry Young, 56, allegedly accessed a computer network within public health agency "Te Whatu Ora" for “dishonest purposes” and downloaded a terabyte of data. Young then published the information online and used it to bolster claims the agency was covering up vaccine deaths.​

 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
This is going to shock you, but law has evolved since the 9th century. So yes, law was surely more theocratic back in the middle ages but broadly speaking it isn't any longer.
Rubbish, the oath is still the primary means by which allegiance is determined.
 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
yes, you linked how to download one tenth the data stolen.
You're clearly incapable of making an actual point. Your link to nbcmontana.com doesn't support your position.

How did Young and/or Kirsch deprive anyone of access to the information?
 

McBell

Unbound
You're clearly incapable of making an actual point.
I have clearly pointed out that there was one terabyte of information stolen.
I have clearly pointed out you do not know very much about the case in question.
I clearly pointed out that only one tenth the stolen information is being made available by the thieves.


That you are merely chasing your tail in the dark is on you.
No one else.
 
Top