• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Supreme Court to Decide Whether to Kick Trump Off Ballot

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Oh my! That is you. You are desperate to defend Trump and Biden talking to a beautiful woman for a few seconds is enough to trigger you. Did he rape her? No. Hmm, did he pay her to sleep with him? No. Did he burst in on her while naked and changing clothing, while she was under aged and then brag about it in an interview? What? Still no?

I think that we can all see who is in denial here, and my feet are dry.
Methinks the MAGAs take refuge in Dems initially
going after Trump with hostility & lies. But now
Trump has real crimes dogging him, so they dwell
on the earlier empty charges.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
So you can’t argue against the lawyer’s argument that Trump is disqualified. OK.
Actually I did, you just didn't see it. Your Atlantic article's "experts" are the very same ones that wrote the other Atlantic article I referred to about the Emoluments Clause. And as I noted they got it absolutely wrong about the Emoluments Clause. In other words these "experts" that you are touting have previously been thoroughly proven wrong on a Constitution law question. They have no credibility and I already provided a solid argument against them.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
It’s because he is unpopular with people that will still vote for him. “Well, I don’t like that he thinks he can grab my wife’s crotch, spits on our soldiers, laughs at the disabled, but…but… Biden eats babies in the Capitol basement!” Sometimes we have to protect people from themselves.
So your opinion of Americans that don't share your opinion is that they don't deserve rights and you should decide what's best for them.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Oh my! That is you. You are desperate to defend Trump and Biden talking to a beautiful woman for a few seconds is enough to trigger you. Did he rape her? No. Hmm, did he pay her to sleep with him? No. Did he burst in on her while naked and changing clothing, while she was under aged and then brag about it in an interview? What? Still no?

I think that we can all see who is in denial here, and my feet are dry.
Once you discern allegation from truths, let me know.


Or provide the proper videos of Trump like those already of Biden in the act.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Your equivalent argument:

“Yeah, my guy may have shot and killed a kid in Times Square….. but your guy was Jaywalking! There’s no difference! I can’t help it if you’re in denial.”

Ay caramba….
So many stuck in the denial loop.....
 

Friend of Mara

Active Member
Once you discern allegation from truths, let me know.


Or provide the proper videos of Trump like those already of Biden in the act.
I mean the recorded phone call of Trump asking for an election official in GA to find exactly the winning amount of votes for him by listed number seems "proper" and "in the act" and arguably far far worse. But sure lets talk shop on both. Lets assume Biden is secretly Satan in disguise and every bad thing ever said about him is true. But what does that mean in defense of what Trump has done?
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
Actually I did, you just didn't see it. Your Atlantic article's "experts" are the very same ones that wrote the other Atlantic article I referred to about the Emoluments Clause. And as I noted they got it absolutely wrong about the Emoluments Clause. In other words these "experts" that you are touting have previously been thoroughly proven wrong on a Constitution law question. They have no credibility and I already provided a solid argument against them.
That doesn't rebut their argument about Trump being disqualified.

If they are trying to keep someone off the ballot that the Constitution says is qualified that is how.
Well they aren't doing that. They are pointing out that Trump is disqualified by what the Constitution says, namely his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, which we all saw.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Once you discern allegation from truths, let me know.
Which one of those were just "allegations"? If Trump admitted to it, or it was shown to be true, such as the dressing room incidents or the paying to cheat on his wife examples, they are not "allegations". If it comes to Trump being a rapist that is not an allegation. He was found to be a rapist in court. One can legally say that Trump is a rapist and he cannot sue for slander. So exactly what was just a mere "allegation"?
Or provide the proper videos of Trump like those already of Biden in the act.
Your video didn't prove anything. Seriously you appear to have some sort of problem. I saw a hug and then he lightly held her for a couple of seconds while talking.

It is time for you to get into a shorter river.
 

Firenze

Active Member
Premium Member
So your opinion of Americans that don't share your opinion is that they don't deserve rights and you should decide what's best for them.
No, my opinion of mentally unbalanced Americans is that they deserve help. I think people that give godlike status to a demagogue that spits on their religion and their countries constitution and rule of law so that he can enrich himself at the nation’s expense meet the definition of unbalanced.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I think people that give godlike status to a demagogue that spits on their religion and their countries constitution and rule of law so that he can enrich himself at the nation’s expense meet the definition of unbalanced.
Leave Biden and his followers out of this.
 

Sgt. Pepper

All you need is love.
So no convictions in a court of law.

Not yet, but the prospect is rapidly growing with the onslaught of the five indictments in four criminal cases, which have resulted in a whopping total of 91 felony charges against him. These felony charges consist of 44 federal charges and 47 state charges. Trump, who claimed that the Continental Army took over the airports during the American Revolutionary War, is obviously not the very stable genius that he once claimed to be, but I'm sure he is smart enough to know that his days are numbered. I wouldn't be surprised if he is starting to worry about his mounting legal woes. And incidentally, just because he hasn't been convicted of any crimes yet doesn't mean that he isn't a threat to democracy and national security, as I mentioned in my prior post here.
 

Sgt. Pepper

All you need is love.


Definitely.

Yes, President Biden is a creepy old man, but what does this have to do with the sexual perversion of Donald Trump? He cheated on his first wife with a mistress who later became his second wife, with whom he cheated on with another mistress who is now his third wife, and with whom he cheated on by having an affair with a porn star and a playboy bunny (both of whom he later paid off). Furthermore, he once told Howard Stern that it was okay to call Ivanka, his daughter, a piece of a** (source) and stated in an interview that if she wasn't his daughter, perhaps he'd be dating her (in his own words). That's not to mention his proud boasting about how he'd go backstage at beauty pageants to "inspect" semi-naked teenage girls (source) and his lewd remarks about how he would forcefully kiss women and grope them between their legs (see spoiler alert). It is perfectly clear to me that he is a sexual predator, a womanizer, and an adulterer, whereas President Biden is merely a dirty old man who can't keep his hands to himself at times. And that's creepy behavior.

 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
Here is something curious. Trump haters spout that he is so unpopular. Yet they are maniacally attempting to keep him off the ballot. If they truly think he isn't popular they should welcome having him on the ballot so he would lose.
No one is suggesting that he is not popular, he clearly is amongst his own supporters.
He is also clearly divisive.
He is also a proven rapist and molester.
before the election he will likely have been found guilty on other charges.
 

Riders

Well-Known Member
Another thing about Trump running is this. Last 4 years he was not President, Biden was and is. So he is running as an ex-President from 4 to 8 years ago, we have never had that. I think that should also disqualify him. He had his chance to run and lost. It should be over now. I still can't believe what was coming out of his mouth about Biden stilling his win and Dems cheating the vote process.

I will never forget that in the election at one point Trump was ahead in in some of the states and I thought for a moment that Trump was going to win. I think at that point that he did too but then the later votes started coming in for the other states. I think I remember Trump telling the election people to stop the counting, stop it now it was almost comical. It was really the craziest election I've ever seen and he got up and announced that he had won. It was nutty
 
Top