• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Teach me the science of creatonism without mentioning evolution.

Me Myself

Me Myself

Back to my username
Sculelos said:
My scientific evidence is that there is NO smooth progression in the fossil record of anything anywhere, especially in the geological column.
Click to expand...

That has nothing to do with any of the claims that you posted.

There is no relationship between the existence of a smooth fossil progression and a being called "God" saying anything is "Good".

Or did I misss some vital part of your scientific method linking those two?
 
ImmortalFlame

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
Sculelos said:
There have been many scientist that have spent their whole lives looking for smooth progressive links and all they have been able to come up with is a very disjointed chart with no smooth progression.

Actually if you remove the Geological column nonsense they don't even really have an argument based on supplied evidence.
Click to expand...

What counts as "smooth progression" to you? Just how much research into geology and archaeology have you actually done? What are you supposing the fossil record should look like were evolution true? Because what we expected to find according to evolution is a gradual development of species over time as we ascend the geological column, and that's exactly what we DO find.

Sculelos said:
Indeed. If Evolution was to be believed no one in their right mind would think that a Chiwawa and a Great Dane could interbreed but it is possible.

https://www.google.com/search?q=CHi...w&biw=1366&bih=630&sei=9pr2UdjAJ8mLiwLIgoHQAQ

https://www.google.com/search?q=CHi...5mduIg.O&fp=3bfc761feda62154&biw=1366&bih=667
Click to expand...
Considering that all domesticated dogs are a direct result of well-understood evolutionary processes and we have a fairly comprehensive understanding of canine evolution, this is total and complete nonsense. You clearly have no understanding of evolution, nor what kind of things are "to be believed" according to it.
 
Last edited:
Me Myself

Me Myself

Back to my username
ImmortalFlame said:
What counts as "smooth progression" to you? Just how much research into geology and archaeology have you actually done? What are you supposing the fossil record should look like were evolution true? Because what we expected to find according to evolution is a gradual development of species over time as we ascend the geological column, and that's exactly what we DO find.


Considering that all domesticated dogs are a direct result of well-understood evolutionary processes and we have a fairly comprehensive understanding of canine evolution, this is total and complete nonsense. You clearly have no understanding of evolution, nor what kind of things are "to be believed" according to it.
Click to expand...



You are out of subject.

This thread is about creationism, not evolution.

I am waiting for scientific evidence in favor of whatever creationism propose, and it`s criteria of falsifiability.
 
Me Myself

Me Myself

Back to my username
Why wouldn`t I?

Surely they must have something to say.

they have been saying for a lot of time there is scientific evidence for creation.

I am sure it`s going to be so complicated they are using a good bit of time figuring out how to dumb it down for me. I give them kudos for that.

At any moment, they will come with the scientific evidences for all their scientific claims about the origin of life and their rigurous method of falsifiability.

I don`t know why you give them such a bad rep.

They are about to show it to us people.

At any minute now.
 
Sculelos

Sculelos

Active Member
Me Myself said:
Why wouldn`t I?

Surely they must have something to say.

they have been saying for a lot of time there is scientific evidence for creation.

I am sure it`s going to be so complicated they are using a good bit of time figuring out how to dumb it down for me. I give them kudos for that.

At any moment, they will come with the scientific evidences for all their scientific claims about the origin of life and their rigurous method of falsifiability.

I don`t know why you give them such a bad rep.

They are about to show it to us people.

At any minute now.
Click to expand...

Observations of that which has already happened is like asking us to go back in time before we were born.

And the fourth is called Pênêmû; he has taught the sons
of men the bitter and the sweet, and taught them all the secrets of their wisdom . 9. He
taught men writing with ink and paper (GTR), and thereby many sinned from eternity and to
eternity and up to this day. 10. For men were not born to the purpose that they should thus
strengthen their fidelity with a pen (GTR) and with ink. 11. For man was not created
otherwise than the angels, that they should remain just and pure, and death, which destroys
all things, would not have touched them , but through this their knowledge they are
destroyed, and through this power it devours me.
Click to expand...

https://www.google.com/search?q=Pen...6&bih=630&sei=Jz33UYfnJNGIigLq8ICgBA#imgdii=_
 
Last edited:
averageJOE

averageJOE

zombie
Sculelos said:
You have asked me an easy question.

Creation consist of 7 parts.

1. The Creation of Time and Space (Nitrogen)
2. The space was empty without energy.
3. God put energy into it and there was energy in it. (Mankind was the Energy form)
4. God called the energy day and the opposite night.
5. And God created Earth in between the Oceans and Outer-space.
6. God created Oxygen and Hydrogen to form Water and Oxygen to separate the Waters underneath the Sea floor from the Waters above the Earth (Outer space)
7. And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
8. And God created plants on the Earth which is on and under the dry land.
9. And God created lights in the Solid parts of Heaven which is what we call planets or stars.
10. Two great lights were formed, the Sun and the Moon.
11. And God set them both in motion in the Solid parts of Heaven.
12.

13.

Remember God created Man but Mankind was destined 6 parts of 986 years, Remember the Lord first created the Heavens and the Earth and all that is in it and then he Rested or Watched it unfold and Each day to God is like 986 years to us and we are currently in the 5801 Year since Creation.

So indeed God is not finished with his creation since mankind has yet to reach the final part and that is the achievement to be created in the image of God.

This Part is not finished yet but will be finished in less then 115 years from now.
Click to expand...

Wow. That was really long winded. I can sum up this entire post with three words: "God did it!"
 
Me Myself

Me Myself

Back to my username
averageJOE said:
Wow. That was really long winded. I can sum up this entire post with three words: "God did it!"
Click to expand...

But you would have to put a very craftily hidden scientific explanation on that phrase too, just like he did with his message.

It has been hidden so intelligently I can`t find it yet! :eek:

I am probably bad at this :(

Has anyone find it yet? I am sure it`s awesome and mindblowing.
 
Sculelos

Sculelos

Active Member
Me Myself said:
But you would have to put a very craftily hidden scientific explanation on that phrase too, just like he did with his message.

It has been hidden so intelligently I can`t find it yet! :eek:

I am probably bad at this :(

Has anyone find it yet? I am sure it`s awesome and mindblowing.
Click to expand...

You asked, don't expect to understand it though :D.

|--------|-------|------|-----|----|---|-+|-|+-|---|----|-----|------|-------|--------|
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top