• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Tennessee bans lots of Drag Shows and gender-affirming care for kids

Brian2

Veteran Member
That doesn't take into account any variations. It's why Republicans sound so damn stupid and ignorant because they think it can simple be summed up as XX is female and XY is male but Nature itself has never held that position or conformed to that belief. It's an erroneous human assumption.

It's just a way to speak about the biological sexual identity of someone. It's more than a human assumption to say that is someone is biologically a female then they are female biologically and the best way for society to go in indentification of that person is to call them female, even if later in life they might decide that they prefer to be male and to identify as male or that they have changed their mind and want to be again identified as female.
Our biological sexual identity is not a matter of what we think we are or what we would like to be.
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
How is sex, when done consensually and responsibly, "evil"? Because ancient goat herders arbitrarily decided it was?

So it's a matter of what is considered morally wrong, and that changes and has changed in the past couple of generations.
I'm sure you would agree.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
These are LITTLE kids. The issue is not should they learn about these lifestyles. It's when, and how. And that is not for the drag queens or the church or some grandstanding governor to decide. I'm fine with the drag queens offering this experience. I think it's quite nice of them, in fact. But it should be understood that any parent that would not want their child to experience this would be respectfully free to forgo it. And as far as I know, that is the case.
And any parent who does want this experience for their child should be allowed, and that is what this bill bans. That is one of the many things that disgusts me. When they defend these kind of bills in terms of parental rights, they are in reality taking away parental rights. And making the lives of children that much more dull and grey. And that in itself is a tragedy. And as bad as that is there were be worse things to come.
 
Last edited:

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
It's just a way to speak about the biological sexual identity of someone. It's more than a human assumption to say that is someone is biologically a female then they are female biologically and the best way for society to go in indentification of that person is to call them female, even if later in life they might decide that they prefer to be male and to identify as male or that they have changed their mind and want to be again identified as female.
Our biological sexual identity is not a matter of what we think we are or what we would like to be.
Our biological sexual identity, many times that is not XX is girl and XY is boy. For starters there's way more variation than those two, and it doesn't matter. We still say boy or girl and people don't flip out despite the mismatch.
 

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
What part of empirical and verifiable scientific evidence did you have difficulty with?
Things that are also scientifically verifiable:
Gender and sex are two distinct categories.

The latter having to do with a spectrum of gonadal and chromosomal traits that run the gamut of typically male, typically female, and intersex.

The former of which having to do with sociological and psychological identities which may or may not line up with sex characteristics. With intersex women or trans women often having XY chromosomes and visa versa for intersex men and trans men. As well as nonbinary that don't meet the psychological or sociological profile for man or woman.

You will not find any credible medical or research institution which says your sex determines your gender or visaversa. Nor is it reasonable to say we determine mam and woman in everyday life based on chromosomes as most of us have never been phenotyped. (In fact most universities have banned them because all too often students found out their chromosomal makeup didn't match their gonadal presentation. In other words, they were intersex.)
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Things that are also scientifically verifiable:
Gender and sex are two distinct categories.
i find no empirical and verifiable evidence for your position. If you are right, how many genders are there? And do you have scientific proof that they exist? (more than just someone who says it is real) I mean really empirical and verifiable and not just in the mind.
 

Orbit

I'm a planet
i find no empirical and verifiable evidence for your position. If you are right, how many genders are there? And do you have scientific proof that they exist? (more than just someone who says it is real) I mean really empirical and verifiable and not just in the mind.
Sex refers to biology. Gender refers to the meanings, roles, and expectations that society assigns to people of a certain sex.
 

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
i find no empirical and verifiable evidence for your position. If you are right, how many genders are there? And do you have scientific proof that they exist? (more than just someone who says it is real) I mean really empirical and verifiable and not just in the mind.
You say "just in the mind" as if psychology doesn't specifically deal with what's in the mind. Do you also assert that depression doesn't exist because it's "just in the mind"?
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
For some reason, I'm not getting alerts for this thread, even though it's one of my watched threads. I posted about it in the software feedback thread.
 

Left Coast

This Is Water
Staff member
Premium Member
XXY or X0 is how that happens. It occurs in 1.5% of births, which amounts to a lot of intersexed people in a country of over 300 million.

The only statistic I can find right now on specifically chromosomal anomalies varying from XX or XY says that it's 1/1,666 births, ie 0.06%.


The higher number of 1.7% of births includes a wide range of other conditions.

Though I'm not sure how any of this discussion about rates is relevant to whether we should allow public drag shows.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
So it's a matter of what is considered morally wrong, and that changes and has changed in the past couple of generations.
I'm sure you would agree.
As we gain knowledge and understanding, the more developed our sense of morality becomes, yes.
It's why slavery was ended, women gained the right to vote, etc.
Unless you consider such progress evil as well.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
I don't get how that phrase has survived. We know enough today to know both that is literally true for the brain amd we can't just change things amd snap out of things, and things just being in the mind doesn't make the joy or suffering any less real.
I wonder if they would be willing to tell a veteran with PTSD that it's not real, to stop faking, or just snap out off it.
 
Top