• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Testing the Bible

A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
There are a number of people who believe that the Hebrew Bible and New Testament are inspired by God and are, therefore, inerrant, and consequently infallible.


It's a mistake to present this as some kind of reasonable argument. The doctrine of infallibility means that people refuse to subject the Bible to anything that can prove that it is in any way false. It's a claim to perfection that refuses to even address the content in a logical way to evaluate the claim.
 

Mountain_Climber

Active Member
There is only one valid way to critique the Bible.

And that is to fully read and seek to understand it with all the details surrounding each event, apart from prejudging it.

And no man that has no faith in it will do that.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
There is only one valid way to critique the Bible.

And that is to fully read and seek to understand it with all the details surrounding each event, apart from prejudging it.

And no man that has no faith in it will do that.

Poor fella.
 

jojom

Active Member
There is only one valid way to critique the Bible.

And that is to fully read and seek to understand it with all the details surrounding each event, apart from prejudging it.

And no man that has no faith in it will do that.
Why not? Why wouldn't someone without faith who sets out to critique the Bible not do it in the most objective manner possible? That is what you're talking about isn't it, objectively critiquing the Bible---not critiquing it through tinted glasses? Your implication that only the believer would do such a thing is truly a self-righteous one. Fact of the matter is that there have been quite a few non-believers who have done just that.


.
 

Mountain_Climber

Active Member
Why not? Why wouldn't someone without faith who sets out to critique the Bible not do it in the most objective manner possible? That is what you're talking about isn't it, objectively critiquing the Bible---not critiquing it through tinted glasses? Your implication that only the believer would do such a thing is truly a self-righteous one. Fact of the matter is that there have been quite a few non-believers who have done just that.


.
No, but I know from experience after fifty years of studying the Bible how difficult it can be to understand. And I do not believe anyone can correctly critique something they don't really understand.

Do you honestly believe you can correctly critique what you don't understand?

I personally see no valid way someone who does not understand it can critique it.
 

Mountain_Climber

Active Member
And I agree, but so what?
.
Yes, you are right. So what? People will always try to evaluate things as to whether or not they consider them to be a worthwhile undertaking, but we have to admit that is a rather precursory evaluation in most cases. But who can really blame them. Not me.
 
Top