Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No prohibition against:
- No prohibition against consuming alcohol, pork products, beef, shellfish, or meat in general
- No prohibition against deviant sex
- No dogma to remember
- No sermons to listen to
- No tithing
- No contradictions with science to reconcile
- It's a natural state....we're all born atheists. To be anything else requires conversion.
I wanted to expand on this one. No guilt for taking away the womenz.- No prohibition against deviant sex
You get Saturday and Sunday off and for me theres less baggage to carry
I wanted to expand on this one. No guilt for taking away the womenz.
Not all Atheists are honest with themselves about their Atheism, same goes with Christianity or any other belief.
Atheism, in one form, the form I had in mind, is a lack of belief. There is little to be dishonest to oneself about. A person says, 'I don't see any kind of credible evidence for God, so I don't think God is real'. There is much less room here for dishonesty.
On the other hand, Christians often say, 'I have my doubts - but I have faith'. This in itself, I think, qualifies as a kind of dishonesty with oneself.
But your right, there are exceptions. When I was writing that post I was thinking to cover the exceptions, because I suspected that someone would make that point lol. But it would be a pain in the *** to think that I have to cover all the exceptions every time I want to say something.
I particularly like being lectured by morons about what atheism truly is. It seems anyone who isn't an atheist is an expert when it comes to atheism.
-Nato
I understand what you mean and I agree with you.
Its just that if One is going to debate with me they better have their notebook handy
As an example, I once considered myself an atheist for some period of time, though I never really felt "fulfilled" I guess, and I broadened my horizon.
Atheism doesn't necessarily teach the Self to restrain or discipline the self in matters of emotional and mental gratification (ego), which can mislead a lot of people into their own sense of hypocritical dogma.
Dishonesty, self deceit, hypocrisy, these are all perks that come along with taking on a label that isn't directly specific to the beliefs of a person.
If an atheist takes on the philosophical position as a Buddhist, then they're representation of atheism becomes false under the single premise that atheism is a lack of belief, which means you cannot be atheistic about buddhism if you believe that atheism is not a belief.
The same argument can be considered when observing the topic of "spiritual scientists", which I have no problem with, just the people that think any sort of spiritual verification is false under the study of science. Since science, religion and art are all really branches of the same tree.
You all know of Atheism, so what are the perks?
If an atheist takes on the philosophical position as a Buddhist, then they're representation of atheism becomes false under the single premise that atheism is a lack of belief, which means you cannot be atheistic about buddhism if you believe that atheism is not a belief.
Since science, religion and art are all really branches of the same tree.
As an example, I once considered myself an atheist for some period of time, though I never really felt "fulfilled" I guess, and I broadened my horizon.