Some great points have been made in this thread so far, and I have read all of them. Nice going, folks!
I attended a private Christian church-funded academy for most of my formative years and was taught creationism directly. I home schooled for a few and was taught creationism directly. I attended a public school for a year then again private school and then finished out my last two years again in a public school. The main difference between the public school and the church funded schools were the available numbers of friends. I found it much easier to get along with people at the public school. I was able to find a group. I have since heard many horrible stories of other students in small church funded schools with similar struggles. There weren't enough students, and many of the students didn't like being in a church funded school and felt trapped. The education was also of lower quality. There weren't as many things to do. Everything was one-size-fits-all. Either you fit in perfectly or you were a completely misfit. I recall hearing that this private church funded academy thing was what has messed up Howard Stern so badly, or at least its what he claims. I believe him.
I believe that I was not required to practice enough arithmetic problems and that I should have been taught speed-arithmetic tricks. That could have changed my life for the better.
I was taught phonics in an early grade, and for me this was a perfect fit. Reading was always easy afterwards. Some students learned better through other methods.
I was not given the opportunity or encouraged to learn a second language before I reached high school. In hindsight I believe this was an inexcusable oversight. I guess I'd have to blame my parents for it, but the schools didn't offer it where I lived. Generally...languages were undervalued and should have been more important.
Public schools have a problem in that they like to experiment and direct their teachers to teach a certain way and then 2 years later tell them to throw away their lesson plans to follow a new theoretical approach. This is exacerbated by the way superintendents are swapped in and out, sort of like churches get their ministers from seminaries. The new superintendent wants to try something new, so the whole school has to flip.
Some interesting quotes from the thread:
the reliance on standardarised testing, and the outsourcing of this that I personally find troubling
Yes, it is troubling. John Oliver has a good show about it, by-the-way.
38 % in the US believe in YEC.
In U.S., Belief in Creationist View of Humans at New Low I call that a fail of the educational system.
I think that is mostly due to church funded private academies and church sponsored home-schooling systems. The public schooling system is not responsible for it, with extremely rare exceptions. Its a church and parental kind of thing. Parents are ultimately in charge of each child's education. I support that even though their choices seem questionable sometimes. Parents always excel in one area and lack in others. You just can't have enough parents. If only I had ten I would have been more well rounded.
Yeah, you don’t know what you are talking about. I am a STEM teacher in the U.S. I am paid one fifth of what I used to make as a high tech engineer. Luckily for my students I don’t need to work for the salary but do it as an avocation because of their need for an education. Teachers are not paid particularly well in the U.S. Someone could get by on just a teacher’s salary. But nobody is going to get wealthy on a teacher’s salary.
Good point. Several other posters have also witness to this.
This reminds me of a common problem with education these days.
Kids who aren't college bound aren't taught trades. And even
math isn't made relevant to practical application.
Yes, and in this regard we should be learning from Europe's example. Why aren't we?