The Bible

[Rex]

I am starting this post off of another post that was made b/c it sounds interesting.


A user said b/c a myth is man-made then it cannot be true.

Then another user said well the bible is man-made so it cannot be true.

Then the first user said god breathed the words into man thus making it not man-made.


Does anyone have any scriptual evidence that the words were breathed into man, and into which man to write the bible, b/c it is basically a collection of entries right?

So theoretically there would be a scripture in each chapter about how god breathed the words into him right?

 

[tigrers99]

With the militant secular fundamentalists; as soon as any prophesy was put down into writing (the first copy or second copy) it was to have been immediately disqualified. Why? Because it is then immediately contaminated because it came into contact with mortal, carnal, man. They believe that we do have the truth that the right men actually wrote all the ancient writings that we have today and that what we have is actually what those authors wrote. The secular fundamentalists just do not believe that we have the ancient truth of the Bible because someone could have written things into and out of it.

 

[Pah]

"So theoretically there would be a scripture in each chapter about how god breathed the words into him right?"

At least something like that,. There are of course some books that reference the "inspired word" but certainly not all. The whole Bible is considered inspired because those that mentioned it were included in canon. Canon was created by men in council subject to all the politics that any organization experiences. Cannon was also changed in various ways by various councils.

Your question leads to a conclusion, given the history of the Bible, that says all books may not be "inspired".