• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Big Bang Theory is dead.

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
It is and historical.
Evolution and billions of years is hogwash
The Bible and a hundred other religious scriptures are all historical, and they all claim different things. The Bible, however, is not a monograph, it's an anthology of diverse writings from largely unknown sources. It's full of material and historical errors, contradictions, and edits. It is not a reliable source for anything, much less for ontological truth.

This claim is supportable; it's evidenced. Your claim of a young Earth and everything being suddenly poofed into existence by an invisible magician is not.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
The Bible and a hundred other religious scriptures are all historical, and they all claim different things. The Bible, however, is not a monograph, it's an anthology of diverse writings from largely unknown sources. It's full of material and historical errors, contradictions, and edits. It is not a reliable source for anything, much less for ontological truth.

This claim is supportable; it's evidenced. Your claim of a young Earth and everything being suddenly poofed into existence by an invisible magician is not.
It is all inspired by God Almighty.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Show your math
Where did the laws of nature come from?

Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?

Where did all energy come from?

Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?

Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?

None of which should exist at all without the fake Big Bang.
 

McBell

Admiral Obvious
Where did the laws of nature come from?

Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?

Where did all energy come from?

Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?

Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?

None of which should exist at all without the fake Big Bang.
This is not showing your math.

Care to try again?
 

cladking

Well-Known Member
God had always existed and always will exist and created all things.

I don't know. I'm sure Something has always existed.

I don't think of the "big bang" as dead so much as it was still born.

Imagine everything coming from a point that isn't even one of four dimensions!!! It has all the earmarks of a problem with definitions and/ or axioms.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Where did the universe come from?
We don't know that it 'came from' at all. It may well have existed whenever there was time.
What caused the Big Bang?
We don't know that there was a cause. We don't know if there was anything 'before' the Big Bang.
If the explanation is the Bing Bang with or without inflation, what was there before that?
Well, a time where all four of the fundamental forces are unified. That would be after the Planck time, but well before the time of inflation.
If there was nothing before the Big Bang, then that breaks cause and effect.
Why would you think that? Cause and effect require time. So if there is no time, then there is neither cause nor effect. No breakage.
It also violates every law of conservation too.
Nope. ALL conservation laws say something along the line of 'the total quantity of X at one time is the same as the total quantity at any other time'. Notice that there has to be time at both for this to make sense. if there is no time, the conservation laws do not apply.
If there was something before that, what caused the thing that was before the Big Bang to come into being?
Well, in this scenario, the most likely case is that there is an infinite regress. Most multiverse models have energy infinitely into the past.
If that thing always, existed that violates the law of increasing entropy.
Nope. The law of entropy is a statistical law, not a fundamental one. In fact, we know that if time is infinite, entropy would have to *decrease* somewhat periodically. Look up the Poincare recurrence time. No breakage. The law is just a statistical one.
If that thing has not always existed what was there before the thing that was prior our universe to come into being?

Please continue this until you get something that has always been.

And then that will violate the law of increasing entropy.
Once again, the law of entropy is NOT absolute. It is simply due to the large number of possible combinations of atoms and molecules. But given sufficient time (and an infinite amount of time would certainly be sufficient), it is guaranteed to be violated. This is well understood.
Where did the laws of nature come from?
Why would they 'come from' at all? To be able to 'come from' requires other laws governing that process. This cannot happen for truly fundamental laws. So the most fundamental laws 'just are': they don't 'come from'.
Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?

Where did all energy come from?

Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?

Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?
Energy has likely existed whenever there was time. The conservation laws apply whenever there is time. But, if time is finite into the past, there is literally no 'before' and so no causality.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
The probability is 0 and it is insane to think the Big Bang cerated the orderly universe.

Nope. The probabilities of the quantum world show that cause and effect are not universal.

The fact that matter has properties means there are natural laws governing it. And that implies that ordered structures will naturally form.

Gravity, in particular, is a great organizer on the cosmic scale: it tends to increase areas of concentration and bring things together into spherical bodies. Chemistry is also a great organizer. Some chemicals naturally attract each other and repel others. This leads to organization: those attracting will form structures together.
 

McBell

Admiral Obvious
We don't know that it 'came from' at all. It may well have existed whenever there was time.

We don't know that there was a cause. We don't know if there was anything 'before' the Big Bang.

Well, a time where all four of the fundamental forces are unified. That would be after the Planck time, but well before the time of inflation.

Why would you think that? Cause and effect require time. So if there is no time, then there is neither cause nor effect. No breakage.

Nope. ALL conservation laws say something along the line of 'the total quantity of X at one time is the same as the total quantity at any other time'. Notice that there has to be time at both for this to make sense. if there is no time, the conservation laws do not apply.

Well, in this scenario, the most likely case is that there is an infinite regress. Most multiverse models have energy infinitely into the past.

Nope. The law of entropy is a statistical law, not a fundamental one. In fact, we know that if time is infinite, entropy would have to *decrease* somewhat periodically. Look up the Poincare recurrence time. No breakage. The law is just a statistical one.

Once again, the law of entropy is NOT absolute. It is simply due to the large number of possible combinations of atoms and molecules. But given sufficient time (and an infinite amount of time would certainly be sufficient), it is guaranteed to be violated. This is well understood.

Why would they 'come from' at all? To be able to 'come from' requires other laws governing that process. This cannot happen for truly fundamental laws. So the most fundamental laws 'just are': they don't 'come from'.

Energy has likely existed whenever there was time. The conservation laws apply whenever there is time. But, if time is finite into the past, there is literally no 'before' and so no causality.
I want to make sure you know that there are those of us who really appreciate you taking the time to reply.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
It is and historical.
Evolution and billions of years is hogwash

Two claims you have not been able to back up. The actual evidence supports evolution. The actual evidence supports the universe being about 13.7 billion years old with the Earth about 4.5 billion years old. In other words, the universe is about 3 times as old as the Earth.

On the other hand, the Bible has plenty of outright historical mistakes. That makes sense because it is generally acknowledged by scholars to be mostly priestly propaganda.
 
Top