SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
It is and historical.How many times must we reïterate -- The Bible Is Not Observable, Testable, Empirical, EVIDENCE!
Evolution and billions of years is hogwash
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It is and historical.How many times must we reïterate -- The Bible Is Not Observable, Testable, Empirical, EVIDENCE!
The Bible and a hundred other religious scriptures are all historical, and they all claim different things. The Bible, however, is not a monograph, it's an anthology of diverse writings from largely unknown sources. It's full of material and historical errors, contradictions, and edits. It is not a reliable source for anything, much less for ontological truth.It is and historical.
Evolution and billions of years is hogwash
It is all inspired by God Almighty.The Bible and a hundred other religious scriptures are all historical, and they all claim different things. The Bible, however, is not a monograph, it's an anthology of diverse writings from largely unknown sources. It's full of material and historical errors, contradictions, and edits. It is not a reliable source for anything, much less for ontological truth.
This claim is supportable; it's evidenced. Your claim of a young Earth and everything being suddenly poofed into existence by an invisible magician is not.
Show your mathThe probability is 0 and it is insane to think the Big Bang cerated the orderly universe.
Where did the laws of nature come from?Show your math
This is not showing your math.Where did the laws of nature come from?
Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?
Where did all energy come from?
Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?
Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?
None of which should exist at all without the fake Big Bang.
add up all the particles listed - over 10^92 by some estimates,This is not showing your math.
Care to try again?
This is not showing your math.add up all the particles listed - over 10^92 by some estimates,
Sum over the number of each type of particle and that comes to about 10^92This is not showing your math.
Care to try again?
For all your claims of being such a highly decorated academic you do not understand what "show your work" means?Sum over the number of each type of particle and that comes to about 10^92
Where does God come from?Where did the universe come from?
God had always existed and always will exist and created all things.Where does God come from?
Ciao
- viole
God had always existed and always will exist and created all things.
Please stop preaching.God had always existed and always will exist and created all things.
There you go.God had always existed and always will exist and created all things.
We don't know that it 'came from' at all. It may well have existed whenever there was time.Where did the universe come from?
We don't know that there was a cause. We don't know if there was anything 'before' the Big Bang.What caused the Big Bang?
Well, a time where all four of the fundamental forces are unified. That would be after the Planck time, but well before the time of inflation.If the explanation is the Bing Bang with or without inflation, what was there before that?
Why would you think that? Cause and effect require time. So if there is no time, then there is neither cause nor effect. No breakage.If there was nothing before the Big Bang, then that breaks cause and effect.
Nope. ALL conservation laws say something along the line of 'the total quantity of X at one time is the same as the total quantity at any other time'. Notice that there has to be time at both for this to make sense. if there is no time, the conservation laws do not apply.It also violates every law of conservation too.
Well, in this scenario, the most likely case is that there is an infinite regress. Most multiverse models have energy infinitely into the past.If there was something before that, what caused the thing that was before the Big Bang to come into being?
Nope. The law of entropy is a statistical law, not a fundamental one. In fact, we know that if time is infinite, entropy would have to *decrease* somewhat periodically. Look up the Poincare recurrence time. No breakage. The law is just a statistical one.If that thing always, existed that violates the law of increasing entropy.
Once again, the law of entropy is NOT absolute. It is simply due to the large number of possible combinations of atoms and molecules. But given sufficient time (and an infinite amount of time would certainly be sufficient), it is guaranteed to be violated. This is well understood.If that thing has not always existed what was there before the thing that was prior our universe to come into being?
Please continue this until you get something that has always been.
And then that will violate the law of increasing entropy.
Why would they 'come from' at all? To be able to 'come from' requires other laws governing that process. This cannot happen for truly fundamental laws. So the most fundamental laws 'just are': they don't 'come from'.Where did the laws of nature come from?
Energy has likely existed whenever there was time. The conservation laws apply whenever there is time. But, if time is finite into the past, there is literally no 'before' and so no causality.Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?
Where did all energy come from?
Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?
Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?
The probability is 0 and it is insane to think the Big Bang cerated the orderly universe.
I have already backed up everything.
I want to make sure you know that there are those of us who really appreciate you taking the time to reply.We don't know that it 'came from' at all. It may well have existed whenever there was time.
We don't know that there was a cause. We don't know if there was anything 'before' the Big Bang.
Well, a time where all four of the fundamental forces are unified. That would be after the Planck time, but well before the time of inflation.
Why would you think that? Cause and effect require time. So if there is no time, then there is neither cause nor effect. No breakage.
Nope. ALL conservation laws say something along the line of 'the total quantity of X at one time is the same as the total quantity at any other time'. Notice that there has to be time at both for this to make sense. if there is no time, the conservation laws do not apply.
Well, in this scenario, the most likely case is that there is an infinite regress. Most multiverse models have energy infinitely into the past.
Nope. The law of entropy is a statistical law, not a fundamental one. In fact, we know that if time is infinite, entropy would have to *decrease* somewhat periodically. Look up the Poincare recurrence time. No breakage. The law is just a statistical one.
Once again, the law of entropy is NOT absolute. It is simply due to the large number of possible combinations of atoms and molecules. But given sufficient time (and an infinite amount of time would certainly be sufficient), it is guaranteed to be violated. This is well understood.
Why would they 'come from' at all? To be able to 'come from' requires other laws governing that process. This cannot happen for truly fundamental laws. So the most fundamental laws 'just are': they don't 'come from'.
Energy has likely existed whenever there was time. The conservation laws apply whenever there is time. But, if time is finite into the past, there is literally no 'before' and so no causality.
It is and historical.
Evolution and billions of years is hogwash