The Big Bang Theory is dead.

[Subduction Zone]

And where is the 65 chromosome species?
How many are there?
They all return to 64 or 66 in subsequent generations.

You are not paying attention. You still lost.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You are not paying attention. You still lost.

I have falsified macro evolution for mammals.
That also falsifies the long ages of the rock layers.
That also falsifies macro evolution for all other species.
That then proves the worldwide flood about 4500 years ago.
Which also proves 6 day recent creation about 6000 years ago.
which falsifies the big hoax of the Big Bang.
Evolution and billions of years is just a house of cards.

 

[ratiocinator]

I have falsified macro evolution for mammals.

No, you have not.

That also falsifies the long ages of the rock layers.
That also falsifies macro evolution for all other species.
That then proves the worldwide flood about 4500 years ago.
Which also proves 6 day recent creation about 6000 years ago.
which falsifies the big hoax of the Big Bang.

Non sequitur, non sequitur, non sequitur, non sequitur, and non sequitur. Even if you had falsified macroevolution in mammals (which you obviously haven't), none of this would follow from it. Logic really isn't your strong suit, is it?

You're good for a laugh, though, I'll give you that.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

No, you have not.


Non sequitur, non sequitur, non sequitur, non sequitur, and non sequitur. Even if you had falsified macroevolution in mammals (which you obviously haven't), none of this would follow from it. Logic really isn't your strong suit, is it?

You're good for a laugh, though, I'll give you that.

Just another of the many infallible proofs that God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago.

 

[ratiocinator]

Just another of the many infallible proofs that God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago.

No, just you stumbling blindly into yet another car crash of illogical assertions.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

No, just you stumbling blindly into yet another car crash of illogical assertions.

I refuted the insanity of evolution and billions of years.

 

[ratiocinator]

I refuted the insanity of evolution and billions of years.

In your dreams, perhaps. Out here in the real world, you've only demonstrated total ignorance of science, mathematics, logic, and the meaning of the word 'refute'.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

I have falsified macro evolution for mammals.
That also falsifies the long ages of the rock layers.
That also falsifies macro evolution for all other species.
That then proves the worldwide flood about 4500 years ago.
Which also proves 6 day recent creation about 6000 years ago.
which falsifies the big hoax of the Big Bang.
Evolution and billions of years is just a house of cards.

All you have shown is that you don't even understand what the words "falsified" and "proven" mean.

 

[Polymath257]

OK. The days are getting longer. According to what I understand this is very gradual. But that is not the point of understanding the time considering each day of creation. Because the word day in Genesis does not have to mean 24 hours each day, and, as I mentioned, the last, or 7th day of creation, has no closure to it.
Plus God doesn't need to rest or sleep as we do. Therefore the seventh day has to be understood in context and reality as far as I am concerned.

In other words, you are going directly against what the Bible itself says. It clearly states that God rested on the seventh day, which is why it is to be kept holy. That means it is already ended and it means the usual day.

 

[Polymath257]

Quoted from

https://news.berkeley.edu/2018/01/1...erent numbers,plants and yeast sometimes can.

While mammals with different numbers of chromosomes cannot produce fertile offspring – which is the case with offspring of donkeys and horses – amphibians, fish, plants and yeast sometimes can.

All mammal species should have the same number of chromosomes.

And this is generally correct, but not absolute. The *reason* mating pairs usually need the same number of chromosomes is that those chromosomes need to line up during fertilization. if they don't, things tend to go wrong.

BUT, in the case of a merger, like what we see in humans, the two chromosomes (in the old version) that merged *can* line up with the one (in the new version) that was result of the merge. This will result in at least one offspring with merged of pairs chromosomes. It can also result in an offspring with the intermediate number of chromosomes. Those will merged pairs will be fertile.

Do you need a diagram?

This is *rare*, but possible. And, based on the evidence, it is what happened in the human line.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

And this is generally correct, but not absolute. The *reason* mating pairs usually need the same number of chromosomes is that those chromosomes need to line up during fertilization. if they don't, things tend to go wrong.

BUT, in the case of a merger, like what we see in humans, the two chromosomes (in the old version) that merged *can* line up with the one (in the new version) that was result of the merge. This will result in at least one offspring with merged of pairs chromosomes. It can also result in an offspring with the intermediate number of chromosomes. Those will merged pairs will be fertile.

Do you need a diagram?

This is *rare*, but possible. And, based on the evidence, it is what happened in the human line.

Not true,
Science has destroyed all possibility of macro evolution.

---><---
See I just made a diagram.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Not true,
Science has destroyed all possibility of macro evolution.

Classic case of

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Classic case of

View attachment 85618

Quoted from

With interspecies hybrids, it makes a difference who's the dad and who's the mom - Berkeley News

New research from Berkeley looks at why some closely related species interbreed and produce viable young – like the mules and hinnies that come from the mating of horses and donkeys – while others don't

news.berkeley.edu

While mammals with different numbers of chromosomes cannot produce fertile offspring – which is the case with offspring of donkeys and horses – amphibians, fish, plants and yeast sometimes can.

All mammal species should have the same number of chromosomes.

I have falsified macro evolution for mammals.
That also falsifies the long ages of the rock layers.
That also falsifies macro evolution for all other species.
That then proves the worldwide flood about 4500 years ago.
Which also proves 6 day recent creation about 6000 years ago.
which falsifies the big hoax of the Big Bang.
Evolution and billions of years is just a house of cards.

 

[Polymath257]

Quoted from

With interspecies hybrids, it makes a difference who's the dad and who's the mom - Berkeley News

New research from Berkeley looks at why some closely related species interbreed and produce viable young – like the mules and hinnies that come from the mating of horses and donkeys – while others don't

news.berkeley.edu

While mammals with different numbers of chromosomes cannot produce fertile offspring – which is the case with offspring of donkeys and horses – amphibians, fish, plants and yeast sometimes can.

All mammal species should have the same number of chromosomes.

I have falsified macro evolution for mammals.
That also falsifies the long ages of the rock layers.
That also falsifies macro evolution for all other species.
That then proves the worldwide flood about 4500 years ago.
Which also proves 6 day recent creation about 6000 years ago.
which falsifies the big hoax of the Big Bang.
Evolution and billions of years is just a house of cards.

Already answered. The answer was dismissed without other comment.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Already answered. The answer was dismissed without other comment.

Because like all evolutionists there was no real answer.

Quoted from

With interspecies hybrids, it makes a difference who's the dad and who's the mom - Berkeley News

New research from Berkeley looks at why some closely related species interbreed and produce viable young – like the mules and hinnies that come from the mating of horses and donkeys – while others don't

news.berkeley.edu

While mammals with different numbers of chromosomes cannot produce fertile offspring – which is the case with offspring of donkeys and horses – amphibians, fish, plants and yeast sometimes can.

All mammal species should have the same number of chromosomes.

So, all the fossils of mammal species with different chromosome number in the rock layers are not descended from each other. That proves that there was no macro evolution of mammal species. So, that proves they were created that way. It also eliminates 225 million years in the rock layers and proves they were laid down in a short time.

But that also eliminates any evolution of any species whatsoever.

Thus, I have falsified macro evolution for mammals.
But that also falsified the long ages of the rock layers.
But that also falsified macro evolution for all other species.
That then proves the worldwide flood about 4500 years ago.
But that also proves 6 day recent creation about 6000 years ago.
And that falsifies the big hoax of the Big Bang.
Evolution and billions of years is just a house of cards.

 

[Polymath257]

Because like all evolutionists there was no real answer.

Quoted from

With interspecies hybrids, it makes a difference who's the dad and who's the mom - Berkeley News

New research from Berkeley looks at why some closely related species interbreed and produce viable young – like the mules and hinnies that come from the mating of horses and donkeys – while others don't

news.berkeley.edu

While mammals with different numbers of chromosomes cannot produce fertile offspring – which is the case with offspring of donkeys and horses – amphibians, fish, plants and yeast sometimes can.

All mammal species should have the same number of chromosomes.

So, all the fossils of mammal species with different chromosome number in the rock layers are not descended from each other. That proves that there was no macro evolution of mammal species. So, that proves they were created that way. It also eliminates 225 million years in the rock layers and proves they were laid down in a short time.

But that also eliminates any evolution of any species whatsoever.

Thus, I have falsified macro evolution for mammals.
But that also falsified the long ages of the rock layers.
But that also falsified macro evolution for all other species.
That then proves the worldwide flood about 4500 years ago.
But that also proves 6 day recent creation about 6000 years ago.
And that falsifies the big hoax of the Big Bang.
Evolution and billions of years is just a house of cards.

I specifically answered the issue of infertility with different numbers of chromosomes. While that is usually the case, in the situation of mergers it is not true. The r is that the chromosomes can still pair up, but with one merged chromosome pairing with *two* unmerged chromosomes.

The actual chromosomes in humans shows that there was a merger in the past (the way both the centromeres and telomeres are in chromosome 2 shows a merger). Also, that the genes *on* the chromosomes match with other apes shows that there was a common ancestor prior to the merge.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I have falsified macro evolution for mammals.
That also falsifies the long ages of the rock layers.
That also falsifies macro evolution for all other species.
That then proves the worldwide flood about 4500 years ago.
Which also proves 6 day recent creation about 6000 years ago.
which falsifies the big hoax of the Big Bang.
Evolution and billions of years is just a house of cards.

No, all of your claims have been refuted.

Why don't you tell us dome more about how you think that your God is s liar.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Just another of the many infallible proofs that God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago.

Sorry, but people laughing at your fear and ignorance is not "proof".

 

[McBell]

I have falsified macro evolution for mammals.
That also falsifies the long ages of the rock layers.
That also falsifies macro evolution for all other species.
That then proves the worldwide flood about 4500 years ago.
Which also proves 6 day recent creation about 6000 years ago.
which falsifies the big hoax of the Big Bang.
Evolution and billions of years is just a house of cards.

Jumping up and down with your fingers in your ears yelling "evolution is false" is not in any way the same as falsifying evolution.
At least not in the real world.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I specifically answered the issue of infertility with different numbers of chromosomes. While that is usually the case, in the situation of mergers it is not true. The r is that the chromosomes can still pair up, but with one merged chromosome pairing with *two* unmerged chromosomes.

The actual chromosomes in humans shows that there was a merger in the past (the way both the centromeres and telomeres are in chromosome 2 shows a merger). Also, that the genes *on* the chromosomes match with other apes shows that there was a common ancestor prior to the merge.

And I gave the example of Przewalski's horse - Wikipedia.

A modern day horse species with 66 chromosomes that interbreeds and produces fertile offspring with the domestic horse. In other words it shows that a join or split in chromosomes is not an automatic producer of sterility when two organisms with different chromosome numbers mate.