It does posit and offer a view of the world and life actually. Animalistic. Dog eat dog. Godless. Beastly. Base.
Not to me, it doesn't. And
you're the one trying to tell me what
I believe.
It IS a religion and certainly mostly involving unbelievers.
No it is not. Repeating it over and over doesn't make it so.
It has absolutely nothing in common with religion.
Not true, TOE extrapolates the current adapting we see into all the far past and goes on to credit that process with why life exists as it does!
This sentence doesn't make any sense to me.
Evolution is a fact of life. It is the backbone of biology. The theory of evolution is the explanation of that fact of life.
Now if all it was doing was noting present nature slow evolving such as in bacteria or whatever, that would be fine. It is not the factual observed evidence that is a problem. It is the degenerate imagination of wicked minds and hearts that is the problem.
I don't care about your past nature hypothesis until you can demonstrate that your claims are true.
You're still not addressing my point.
False. I have have heard of DNA but we have no good sample from pre KT layer times! So if all you want to talk about is the last several decades and what is related fine. You may not tell us that DNA was the same exactly in Noah's day!
Oh, it's false that all living creatures are related to varying degrees which we can actually see when we analyze our genomes?
If you want to deny demonstrable reality, there is no helping you.
Just curious, if you don't acknowledge this obvious reality, how do you think people are mapping out their ancestry? How do you think DNA paternity tests work? Magic?
Whatever people misunderstand could reinforce their beliefs.
This doesn't make any sense either.
How is it that you've said all this and
still haven't addressed the point?