Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If you haven't checked it out already, you definitely should. This 8-minute video explains the complexity of God in a somewhat simple way. Great for atheists, Jews and all other faiths that find the Godhead confusing.
Let me know whether you agree or disagree.
God bless you!
If you haven't checked it out already, you definitely should. This 8-minute video explains the complexity of God in a somewhat simple way. Great for atheists, Jews and all other faiths that find the Godhead confusing.
Let me know whether you agree or disagree.
God bless you!
They're not saying God is composed of complex parts. God has no parts, thus no complexity.I'm too lazy to watch the video. But anyway, if you are invoking a complex deity as your explanation for where complexity comes from, you only raise more questions about where the deity came from, so you end up re-creating the problem you were trying to solve.
If you haven't checked it out already, you definitely should. This 8-minute video explains the complexity of God in a somewhat simple way. Great for atheists, Jews and all other faiths that find the Godhead confusing.
Let me know whether you agree or disagree.
God bless you!
The Bible says God is one.
If you haven't checked it out already, you definitely should. This 8-minute video explains the complexity of God in a somewhat simple way. Great for atheists, Jews and all other faiths that find the Godhead confusing.
Let me know whether you agree or disagree.
God bless you!
They're not saying God is composed of complex parts. God has no parts, thus no complexity.
What they are saying is that are God transcends human ability to fully conceptualize. That we can only understand God though analogy.
I'm sorry but is this meant to make sense?"That we can only understand God though analogy."
Thats minimizing experience and elevating the intellect absurdly enough..although if orgasm is an analogy i am all in on it.. I will run that by my better half see what she says.
Sorry i am all about you know breathing trees, hiking in the wilderness or REALITY!!I'm sorry but is this meant to make sense?
Look, if you think you comprehend God in His fullness, in His infinite essence then I'm not going to be able to talk you out of that belief. But by no means will I accept that whatever you have in your head is at all approaching anything resembling God.
Actually I as a Jew have no problems understanding the Trinity. I simply don't buy it. Big difference.
To put it bluntly, how do they know? If God “transcends human ability to fully conceptualize”, no amount of analogy or anything else is going to help. If they’re defining God as something we literally can’t understand, they can’t go on to explain anything about that God. It’s like saying there’s an invisible box in the middle of the room and though we’ve no way of seeing it, you know its’s green.What they are saying is that are God transcends human ability to fully conceptualize. That we can only understand God though analogy.
We experience God in part and with less evolved spiritual sensory system. It means we CAN know God, but we cannot know his infiniteness.To put it bluntly, how do they know? If God “transcends human ability to fully conceptualize”, no amount of analogy or anything else is going to help. If they’re defining God as something we literally can’t understand, they can’t go on to explain anything about that God. It’s like saying there’s an invisible box in the middle of the room and though we’ve no way of seeing it, you know its’s green.