• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The contributions of the sciences to Religion

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
yes those people who misinterpret natural events and are unaware of the way our brain process information and unaware of statistical principles.

there's a chance out of 6 that throwing a dice you'll be able to predict the outcome of the throw.
this means that for one people out of six it will be self evident that they have predictive ability if they misinterpret the event of them guessing right the outcome of the dice throw.

would you think it's a coincidence or would you think you have some power if you throw not just 1 but 4 dices and you predict the outcome right? well, there's a 1:1296 chance it would actually happen. If you take 3000 people and you make them throw four dice, on average 3 of them will believe they have mental powers.

You think about 100 different people each day.
one day while you were thinking to a particular people the phone ring and it's him calling.
many people would go "wow, it's amazing, i was thinking of you and you called me, there must be something supernatural behind this" while in fact they totally ignore the 99 times that coincidence didn't occur in that particular day and the thousands of times that coincidence didn't happen on all the other days. our brain tend to discard negative result and just store those events when you get some positive association. From here the illusion.
Statistics are understood...but nevertheless there exists a medium between between all sentient life forms that allows a form communication between them at a non-verbal level... Science may, in the main eschew it because it would upset the apple cart of contemporary science orthodoxy...but there it is for all to note and experience...
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
I was of course referring to you atheists and materialists...:)
Sure, you can refer to whoever you like, with any claims, with whichever degree of credibility, that you desire.

Whether that makes sense is something else entirely, though.
 

prometheus11

Well-Known Member
In the case of a Zener Card test, results are usually higher when performed with people on mild hallucinogenics. It's not nearly enough to show telepathy, but it's interesting that people perform slightly better under such conditions.
 

prometheus11

Well-Known Member
Statistics are understood...but nevertheless there exists a medium between between all sentient life forms that allows a form communication between them at a non-verbal level... Science may, in the main eschew it because it would upset the apple cart of contemporary science orthodoxy...but there it is for all to note and experience...

What medium?
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
You're trying to label me yourself without me actually disclosing what I am. Confirmation bias. What belief of mine do you speak of exactly? Let's hear your unfounded assumptions about me.

I'm not the one trying to confirm anything. You are. You're concluding that thinking about someone and they call you a few moments later is some form of telepathy while ruling out all other possibilities. The burden of proof is on you.
Your belief in materialism...you belief that there is not a spacial aether that allows this so called telepathic rapport...

Why should I need to prove it to you when it is already self evident to most people... If you want proof? ...just be more self aware in life to see the amazing underlying one life at work....
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
Sure, you can refer to whoever you like, with any claims, with whichever degree of credibility, that you desire.

Whether that makes sense is something else entirely, though.
It can never make sense to someone who has confirmation bias...they have drunk the kool aid...
 

prometheus11

Well-Known Member
Your belief in materialism...you belief that there is not a spacial aether that allows this so called telepathic rapport...

Why should I need to prove it to you when it is already self evident to most people... If you want proof? ...just be more self aware in life to see the amazing underlying one life at work....

Empty rhetoric. Anybody could substitute whatever terms they want to and make an equally useless claim.

Would you like me to show you?
 

AndromedaRXJ

Active Member
Your belief in materialism...you belief that there is not a spacial aether that allows this so called telepathic rapport...

I never mentioned once that I was a materialist. Furthermore, I never said telepathic doesn't exist (nor did I say it does either). What I am saying is your rationale to conclude that it does exist is flawed (thinking of people who call you moments later), because you rule out all other possibilities. Your problem is you jump to conclusions to easily, both about observed phenomena and about the people you speak to.
 
Last edited:

gnostic

The Lost One
paarsurrey said:
The contributions of the sciences to Religion

Yes, science have contribute to religion.

Science have put holes in religion, in creationism and in their superstitious beliefs. Science have dispelled primitive beliefs and superstitions.

Science have contributed to verifiable knowledge, not to superstitious religious beliefs.
 
Top