Prove me wrong. You are going to find, if you look, way more evidence on the internet that supports the validity of ESP than you will find that does not support ESP. Tis a fact you know.
You are the one who made claims (you and ben_d) that ESP is supported scientifically, then you are the one who need to either provide evidences or at the very least provide evidences from (scientific) sources. The ONE who make a claim about something as supernatural as ESP, has the "burden of proof".
No one here would expect you to expect you to doing the testing or find verifiable evidences for ESP, but if you are going to make such outlandish, then you are going to have to show that the scientists have "verified" ESP is real, from actual peer reviewed papers or articles on that subject.
ESP have never been scientifically verifiable or provable, and that's why I think you are trying to shift the burden of proof to others.
To date, the parapsychological researchers and parapsychology have been deemed to be pseudoscience, just like that of creationists and creationism, and of Intelligent Design, alien abductions, big foot, Loch Ness monster, etc.
ESP have only been successful in the realms of fiction of the paranormal or supernatural or sci-fi, whether the fiction be in books, tv shows or movies, but not in real life.