• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The FDA and the WHO

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Sure and you blindly follow. Did you have a point?
I mean that if you were actually looking for "the best and accurate information" to judge the technical merits of two seemingly contradictory recommendations from epidemiologists, you would have looked to people with some sort of real knowledge of epidemiology and not a random group of lay people (e.g. the membership of RF).

Your OP fits the pattern of JAQing off much better than it does what you're saying.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
I mean that if you were actually looking for "the best and accurate information" to judge the technical merits of two seemingly contradictory recommendations from epidemiologists, you would have looked to people with some sort of real knowledge of epidemiology and not a random group of lay people (e.g. the membership of RF).

Your OP fits the pattern of JAQing off much better than it does what you're saying.

Hmm lets see... Posting links from two authoritative sources, asking others what they think, and asking questions is better than just setting silent and drinking the kool-aid.
 
Top