See, people do get it very, very wrong. Thanks for proving the OP right.
Evolution in terms of biology is the change in allele frequencies in a population over time. That is an observed fact.
Yep and the population is still the same population.Fruitflys remained fruitflys and bacteria remained bacteria and humans remain humans and chimps remain chimps, regardless. What you are describing is in kind adaptations at most. All your research showns is what happens when an organism has offspring. Creationists believe in babies darls and your allele frequencies are a sad attempt at providing evidence that one kind evolves into another kind.
The matching nested heirarchies from genetics and morphology are an observed fact.
MMMmmm! So neanderthal was an ape man and now comes into our genus with genetic data. You have researchers still contesting this. Your nested heitarchies and ancestral connections are nothing more than presumptive at best.
Taxonomies may change frequently (as seen in biological taxonomy), but the underlying concept of nested hierarchies is always the same.
Hierarchy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Horizontal gene transfer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Now your researchrs have found HGT in multicelled organisms.
Gogarten: I think the pendulum swings back and forth. In the 1940s, scientists had largely given up on the idea that we could create a tree of life – a chart that would show us the lineage of organisms on Earth. Researchers figured because so much HGT was going on, it would be impossible to separate species into distinct lineages. Then, over the past decades, researchers like myself have given thought to the possibility that we may indeed be able to classify organisms, at least to some extent, despite the fact that they so frequently trade DNA. Yet rather than a tree of life, I think what we have to envision when we think of connections between species is more like a web, a network – where there are main lines of ancestry, yet some species that don’t fall strictly into any category between them. In this area, I think we are just scratching the surface of what we will find when we really start to learn more about how HGT has affected the evolution of organisms over the course of history.
Insights into horizontal gene transfer: conversations with Dr. Peter Gogarten and Dr. James Lake
You people are incredible. I laughed hard when I realised some of what you base ancestry on is various species being exposed to the same disease showing likeness in genes. What a joke!
The fossil record in an observed fact.
This is really the only evidence you have. The rest you mentioned use probabilities and change like the wind. The fossil evidence shows the sudden appearance of life during the cambrian, another creative event. You have found no common ancestors eg birds. You presume ancestry to pre cambrian life but have no evidence. Even your increasing complexity arguments have failed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devolution_(biology)
Genome increase as a clock for the origin and evolution of life
Speciation is an observed fact.
Well if you call every small variation a different species and say this is what produces a new 'kind' eventually you have no proof at all. Even a fruit fly with legs hanging off its head is still a fruitfly that died due to its mutations. Showing how a fruitfly or bacteria adapts does not prove a chimp man is going to turn into a human. It means that chimp man may get bigger or smaller, may change diet, may have resistence to disease his pop never had but that does not start tuning him into a human.
The patterns of ERVs are an observed fact.
Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) are sequences in the genome thought to be derived from ancient viral infections of germ cells in humans, mammals and other vertebrates; as such their proviruses are passed on to the next generation and now remain in the genome.
Endogenous retroviruses may be a variant of a retrovirus which became permanently integrated with its host and is inherited from generation to generation as part of the genome of the host.
Endogenous retrovirus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ahhaahaahhaa! Maybe we evolved from birds.....bird flu! Maybe we evolved from dogs, they have diabetes and cancer. What rubbish you use to ascertain presumptive ancestry.
The ToE explains these facts.
All you've shown is that maybe a mosquito carrying some disease hit on various creatures. Well done! I could have told you that for far less money.
The only person confusing the difference is yourself
Do you think the flu or exposure to any virus or bacteria is going to change some mythical creature into a whale and a hippo? Truly sad but admittedly the best you can provide.
