Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Oh. OK, now there's a picture. Varied and multiple images of the one.Is this one? or many?
so there isn't one picture with many shades? or one team with many members? one person with many clothes? one forest, or copse, with many trees? one field with many plants? one garden with many furrows?2 is not generally described as "many".
You are telling this to a pragmatic realist?so there isn't one picture with many shades? or one team with many members? one person with many clothes? one forest, or copse, with many trees? one field with many plants? one garden with many furrows?
and if we make it all one shade does the one picture cease to exist? if we make all the forms collapse back into one energy form does it cease to exist?
There is no separation, but there are many forms.Is this one? or many?
so you don't associate with forms but accept that they arise and fall into some other nature?You are telling this to a pragmatic realist?
There is no separation, but there are many forms.
Is this one? or many?
Is this one? or many?
Is this one? or many?
One picture. AMIRITE?
I guess I was wrong. I went to this thread on my tablet, put it next to my laptop, and then there were two pictures. Then I went and got my phone, sat down in front of the laptop and tablet, went to this thread, and then there were three.
So I'm changing my answer to many.
minnie is usually only one; unless dissassociative identity disorder.Is there separateness between the concepts of one and many??