I believe God can make Himself King and needs no help from man made rules. The fulfillment of prophecy only requires Him to be an offspring of David and Mary qualifies as that.
Man is not the one who sets the rules G-D does ,in terms of the female, ancient sentiment did not comport with the mention of the mother as the genealogical link. Among the Greeks a man was the son of his father, not of his mother; thus ‘Genus matris non vocatur genus.
Jesus was not the natural son of Joseph but was the Son of G-D as I mentioned , Luke’s genealogy of Jesus would prove that he was, by human birth, a son of David through his natural mother Mary.
'I believe God can make Himself King and needs no help from man made rules."
True G-D can do anything he wants and who exist that can stop him but he set rules and standards for man and he follows the set rules himself as a
precedent for example,The Devil challenged G-Ds right to rule over mankind that man should choose for himself what was good or bad and didnt need him G-D to tell him what was right or wrong,G-D could have settled the matter in Eden by destroying any opposition to his rule ,but the challenge was not of power but of G-Ds right to rule over mankind.
It the same with Jesus right to rule over the Davidic throne only one who has the legal right would rule.
Ezekiel 21
A ruin, a ruin, a ruin I will make it. And it will not belong to anyone until the one who has the legal right comes,+ and I will give it to him.’+
G-D has rules that he set and adhere to as well
Under inspiration he says:
Matthew 1
The book of the history* of Jesus Christ,son of David,+ son of Abraham:+
He could legally say son of David because Jesus was actually the Son of God and the natural heir to the Kingdom by miraculous birth through the virgin girl Mary, of David’s line and that Jesus was also the legal heir in the male line of descent from David and Solomon through his adoptive father Joseph.
From Joseph Israel has a problem ,thus it has been historically accepted among Jews that the Messiah will be a male line descendant of David, the lineage of Jesus is cited as a factor as to why Jews do not believe him to have been the Messiah. As the proposed son of God, he could not have been a male line descendant of David and, if going through his earthly parents, Mary and Joseph, he would not have had the proper lineage either, as he would not have been a male line descendant through Mary, and Joseph descended from Jeconiah whose descendants are explicitly barred by God from ever ruling Israel I understand that argument however , Shealtiel was the son of Jeconiah; perhaps by marriage to the daughter of Neri he became Neri’s son-in law, thus being called the “son of Neri.” It is possible as well that Neri had no sons, so that Shealtiel was counted as his “son” for that reason also. Zerubbabel, who was likely the actual son of Pedaiah, was legally reckoned as the son of Shealtiel, So it doesnt nullifly Jesus as heir to the throne of Davis as he has the legal right.
The Quran mentions the House of David once: "Work, O family of David, in gratitude. And few of My servants are grateful." and mentions David himself 16 times.
According to some Islamic sources, some of the Jewish settlers in Arabia were of the Davidic line.
The point is Jehovah G-D sets the rules and makes sure there is a legal case for his actions.