Rapture theology teaches no such thing FaithofChristian, and I have a hard time believing you started this thread thinking this is something a rapturist believes.
First, Rapture theology does not teach that people will “fly” during the Rapture. As I have pointed out to you, time and time again, the word harpazo means to be “caught up”, not fly. That is a distinct difference.
The Rapture teaches people they will be Raptured out, the same, fly out to save their souls. It's all the same. Whether it's caught up or fly up, to save their souls.
It comes down as meaning the same thing.
Second, Rapture theology does not claim people will be able to save themselves. All salvation belongs to our Lord, Jesus Christ.
No but your Rapture does teach that people will be caught up,thereby to save their souls. Otherwise why do teach people they will be caught up. If not to save their souls, from what you claim is the wrath of God.
Third, I am not aware of any reputable Christian theologian who teaches people will fly away “to save their souls” so your application of Ezekiel to Rapture theology is incorrect.
That's all because those Christians theologians, are teaching man's teachings and doctrines, unto which Christ Jesus condemned in Matthew 15:7-9.
As such you leave the reader with little alternative than to consider your assertion a strawman, designed not to engage in honest discussion with the Rapture believers of this forum but to disparage them.
Well since I do not believe in your silly Rapture Theory, I have the right to answer the Thread, in my way and not your way.
And God even denounce your Rapture in the book of Proverbs 10:30--"the righteous shall never be removed: but the wicked shall not inhabit the earth"
It's easy to see, what God is saying here, if the wicked shall not inhabit the earth, Then that means, The righteous shall ( Never ) be Removed from the earth.
So how does your little Rapture Theory fit, into what God has said, The Righteous shall never be removed, Meaning from the earth ?
I’m aware that there are lots of folks on this forum willing to don an angel outfit, march up and down our church aisles, and pronounce this person Christian and that person heretic. Apparently you’re recommending we add your name to the list.
Is this correct?
Oh come on FOC! There is simply no need to go there. Besides, we both know that what you think of me is immaterial; it’s only what Christ thinks that matters.
In any event, if you have felt personally offended by anything I’ve posted I apologize. I try to focus on the assertion rather than the asserter. I have absolutely zero desire to attack you personally.
Let’s just say we agree to disagree on this. You strike me as someone who enjoys a good spirited debate every now and then so I’m actually looking forward to future discussions where we can agree on things and others where we have less emphatic disagreements.
I’ve noticed a few threads where skeptics claim scripture as bogus
. Perhaps we can start there…and not because we agree on our eschatology, but because we both believe the bible is the word of God and have mutual respect for our pro and anti-Rapture positions.